105
submitted 5 hours ago by TRAHR@quokk.au to c/politics@lemmy.world

In the continuing race to see who can throw transgender people under the bus most quickly, South Carolina Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate Annie Andrews has released a new direct-to-camera campaign ad in which she states that she does not support trans athletes playing in sports that affirm their gender identity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 46 points 5 hours ago

SUPPORTING Trans people is a WINNING issue? Quick! THROW Trans people UNDER the Bus!

-LITERALLY Democrats!

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 1 points 38 minutes ago

They can't hide their hatred

[-] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 hours ago

Supporting trans people is a winning issue for Democrats but it's not for conservative Republicans.

This election specifically Democrats are hopeful they'd get votes from a large portion of traditionally Republican voters so they are pushing a bit on Trans to please Republicans but not too much that they lose their Democrat voters

[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 3 points 1 hour ago

This election specifically Democrats are hopeful they’d get votes from a large portion of traditionally Republican voters so they are pushing a bit on Trans to please Republicans but not too much that they lose their Democrat voters

But at the end of the day it doesn't matter. It's what they do on all of the "controversial issues" since the dawn of time. Biden and Obama both ramped up deportations and poured more into the border than anyone before them. What did it get them... all republican voters still believe they had "open borders".

[-] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

‘Pushing a bit’

What a way to phrase it.

[-] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 33 points 4 hours ago

This election specifically Democrats are hopeful they’d get votes from a large portion of traditionally Republican voters

That's not just this election. That's been every election in my memory. They cling to this strategy, even though it keeps failing.

Surely this time they'll want a watered down version of the thing they keep going harder on!

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Schumer bangs on about having an imaginary Republican couple in his head dictating his every action. If that isn't a big fuck you to the people who vote democrat I don't know what is.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 hours ago

Appealing to no one, you say? Can't see how this strategy could fail yet again!

Trump dubbed Andrews “Annie Trannie” in a social media post Monday and said she favored “Transgender for Everyone.” He also shared a commercial attacking her on transgender issues.

In a direct-to-camera ad, Andrews retorted, “I want you to hear me loud and clear: I don’t support biological men playing women’s sports and I don’t support and haven’t ever performed gender surgery for minors.” As she speaks, text reading “No men in women’s sports” and “No gender surgeries for minors” appears next to her.

With Republicans running the state house and senate, has two republican US senators and six of the seven house delegates are republicans this may be a stance you need to take to have a chance in South Carolina.

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Trump's most successful ad during the campaign was against trans and he won the election.

Democrats are only 30% of voters. Trump wants that other 70% to vote for him.

Sure, he could be pro universal healthcare instead (he'd get almost all of that 70% if he was), but he'd lose a lot of "donations". Trans is an easy issue for him without any cost.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2026
105 points (95.7% liked)

politics

31338 readers
2619 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS