105
submitted 1 day ago by CityPop@lemmy.today to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 day ago

Just demonstrates how dangerous it is to let a private entity construct a constellation that entire countries rely on.

[-] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

As if it being in Trump's direct control would be better.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

It’s probably a bad idea for it to be the property of a single nation, too.

[-] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

It will still be controlled by someone or something. And some nation will probably have greater indirect influence on it. And if it's a truly independent organization then how is it different from private ownership? you can't escape inevitable politics and abuse connected to this kind of power.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 23 hours ago

But wouldn’t it be better than at the personal whims of a megalomaniac?

[-] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 1 points 23 hours ago

I mean sure but I don't believe this can be achieved. No country will relinquish control of such satellite constellations in the name of greater good, because they will be afraid that someone else would use it against them.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2026
105 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2502 readers
1351 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great News Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS