102
Just demonstrates how dangerous it is to let a private entity construct a constellation that entire countries rely on.
As if it being in Trump's direct control would be better.
It’s probably a bad idea for it to be the property of a single nation, too.
It will still be controlled by someone or something. And some nation will probably have greater indirect influence on it. And if it's a truly independent organization then how is it different from private ownership? you can't escape inevitable politics and abuse connected to this kind of power.
But wouldn’t it be better than at the personal whims of a megalomaniac?
I mean sure but I don't believe this can be achieved. No country will relinquish control of such satellite constellations in the name of greater good, because they will be afraid that someone else would use it against them.
First no incoming missiles warning, now this. This happens when you depend (wanting or not) on incredibly shitty persons.
Musk and Trump, what a pair of cunts.
The trump musk smell is all over this thing.
The orange numpty wants Russian diesel, the whole world tells the US to eat shit and die so everyone's least favorite toadie cuts off access to drones.
How much you want to bet this is retaliation for the reduced bot traffic on Twitter.
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2026
102 points (100.0% liked)
World News
2502 readers
1029 users here now
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great News Communities:
Rules
Be excellent to each other
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS