859
submitted 2 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Some hosts are threatening to strike, while others are plotting ways around Airbnb’s new restrictions. Guests, meanwhile, are celebrating.

AIRBNB HOSTS ARE melting down over a new policy banning them from making guests complete tasks that “would typically be performed by a cleaner,” like “stripping the bed, taking trash offsite, or washing and putting away dishes.”

The change, which applies to all bookings made on or after November 20, quickly sparked outrage after it was announced in an email to Airbnb hosts on Wednesday. Many began fuming online about losing the right to make their guests clean up after themselves.

“As hosts, we have a responsibility to protect our investments, our homes, and, in many cases, our personal living spaces,” one person wrote in Airbnb’s official forum for hosts. “The problem is that Airbnb increasingly expects hosts to accept the risks while limiting our ability to protect ourselves.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

“As hosts, we have a responsibility to protect our investments, our homes, and, in many cases, our personal living spaces,”

As hosts, you can go fuck yourselves after what you did with the house market.

“The problem is that Airbnb increasingly expects hosts to accept the risks while limiting our ability to protect ourselves.”

No, the problem is that you expect all the good from the hotel market without all the bad from the hotel market. Because let's be honest, you're not renting your house or your room for one night eventually, you're trying to live off this, and that makes you a hotel.

No sympathy for these assholes that only deserve the worst after fucking so many cities and towns.

Some hosts are threatening to strike

Oh please... don't threaten us with a good time. Please do, strike indefinitely. My only hope is that you start losing money and go broke because that's what you deserve for making a business off the house market.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 89 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't even understand why people use Airbnb.

Every time I've looked at Airbnb, a hotel was cheaper and easier. Hotels certainly have some hidden fees, but nothing like airbnb has.

Oh look, this house is 60 dollars a night. That could work for my two night stay.. oh wait, now that I've clicked the listing, it has a 400 dollar cleaning fee. I've worked in cleaning. cleaning a house does not cost 400 dollars, and thats assuming you have professional cleaners coming in to clean it, which we both know you don't. You expect the guest to do all the cleaning, and you come in, spend 30 minutes doing the bare minimum touchup, and want 400 dollars for it.

[-] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

It was so much cheaper back in the day. Me and my wife would rent out either a guest suite or a room for a couple nights in new cities. I’m talking like $40/night with fees or a little more but with advantages of a kitchen and a couch vs a hotel suite.

Also we rented one twice to host big parties because neither us nor any of our friends in the city have a house big enough to host and comfortably sleep 15 people. Luckily that’s changing soon as my wife and I finally purchased a place in the city, and look forward to hosting our friends for years to come.

[-] KatakiY@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago

Tenish years ago I would use air bnb because it was a good bit cheaper than a mid level hotel and you'd get a whole house with a kitchen. Means I'd save money and could cook. But that's changed and it's usually more expensive for air bnb now

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

I don’t even understand why people use Airbnb.

So, in the long long ago, in the before time, Airbnb was a way to rent out your apartment or home for a week, while you were on vacation, or to rent out a spare room with minimal headaches. In fact, after Craigslist more or less died, it was THE way to do it.

Over time, this changed.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I haven't even considered an Airbnb in close to 8 years. Pay a cleaning fee and have to strip the bed linens, take out all trash, and tidy everything...on top of a moldy af bathroom, having to check all potential locations for the hidden cameras, and getting texts every 30 minutes telling (not asking, TELLING) me to leave a 5 start review. Fuck you

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] miseducator@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

Hotels don't rent out houses in the middle of nowhere for my friends and me to get trashed at for the weekend. They're really nice if you want to get out of the city and relax in someone else's house for a couple days.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Now, most Air Bnbs don't allow you to have a bunch of friends to get trashed over a weekend... It's in the listing rules.

[-] Goforce5@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I exclusively use it for less populated areas where the hotels are sketchy at best. Its worked out well for me, but maybe I've gotten lucky.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

sometimes it might be useful for a large group visiting that needed a whole house rather than trying to get hotel/motel for each person a room, im guessing its convenience and simplicity for groups. not useful if you are 1-3 people.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

I paid $80 for a room in the middle of LA

[-] riskable@programming.dev 19 points 2 days ago

That's kind of high for the middle of Louisiana. Just sayin.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

We've used airbnb twice because it was for a whole house and I have a severely disabled daughter who can get loud and physically disruptive. Those were the only family vacations that we've ever been able to take because hotels generally can't accommodate us. This isn't a common requirement, and if not for that special use case, I'd pick a hotel every time.

[-] ardorhb@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I guess it depends on the region. Used Airbnb a lot in spring when I did an Interrail tour through central/eastern Europe. Often it was just the cheapest option. Sometimes hostels with 10+ beds in a room are cheaper (also used these quit often in my first Interrail tour trough other parts of the continent a couple of years back) but not always.

Then also the thing with having a kitchen which can safe you some more money. Especially for breakfast, it's crazy how hotels are pricing them.

Not trying to say that Airbnb is cheap(or isn't destroying the housing market), it's just that hotels are expensive. At least in the areas I travel.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

When it first started it was good for traveling on a budget. But yeah then greedy assholes ruined it by trying to gouge every dollar they could out of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flandish@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

how people get away with thinking a HOME is an investment is insane to me. Homes are for living in.

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

Homes are for living in.

This is the same thing Xi Jinping said when he intentionally crashed the housing market.

Is that what you COMMUNISTS want, to destroy the wealth of hard working housing speculators?

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago
[-] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) stop. i can only get so hard.

[-] jpreston1986@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've often thought of, instead of buying my first home, to wait, save, and buy one of those homes that's been split up into two nice apartments? Then live in one, while renting out the other. I don't think I'd want to do Air BnB though... Rather just find a nice tenant that won't eff the place up, be the landlord I always wanted (free rent for December plus they get all the extra sweets I bake).

I was actually surprised, all the places I've rented, none gave discount during December. I figured it would be a thing people did, like Christmas bonuses at work.

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 5 points 1 day ago

No, landlords don't give discounts in december. That doesn't make any sense.

[-] jpreston1986@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

If they were better people, they would. Just another example of how slumlords are terrible people. Rich enough to own multiple houses yet can't share a sliver of wealth during the one time of year it's needed most? bah! humbug!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

I'm renting from someone like that right now. Works great, I get to keep a little garden, I do some home maintenance without having to go through all the home ownership stuff. And rent is cheap. No in-unit laundry, but I can't complain about that given the other advantages.

I've never heard of rent being discounted in December. Christmas bonuses aren't as common as they used to be, either.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AmyAye@nord.pub 34 points 2 days ago

the problem is that you expect all the good from the hotel market without all the bad from the hotel market.

Every single one of these stupid middle man, gig work bull shit "disruptive" companies in a nutshell.

Air BnB, Door Dash, Uber, etc etc.

They want to sit in the middle scraping money from "gig workers" doing a "side hustle", while skirting all the regulation from the industry they are apeing.

load more comments (18 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2026
859 points (99.3% liked)

News

39683 readers
2924 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS