87
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 19 hours ago

Iowan here, and he's not getting mine. Every other seat on the ticket I'll hold my nose and vote dem, but for his I'll either vote 3rd party or write-in for trans rights.

His opponent is also trash, but if he's willing to do this shit to win an election his policy votes will absolutely be hot garbage.

Fuck i hate it here lol

[-] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

As a trans person, I would much rather have a Dem that takes away my rights than a republican. At least the Dem can probably be reasoned with a little bit, the republican cannot. The republican will make it their priority to take away my rights, in fact.

I thought at least some people would've learned this in 2024. Guess not.

[-] SippyCup@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm like 70% certain he's a spoiler ballot candidate. Someone propped up by Republicans to run against their hot garbage candidate. Unappealing to any but the most centrist of liberals, I'm kinda surprised he survived the primaries

[-] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

I totally understand the frustration. But when it's a choice between losing access to health care vs. getting locked up or worse, please don't throw away your vote.

[-] Cherries@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Turek is the one throwing away voters. If folks find it too difficult to bootstrap themselves out of the trash can that's the candidate's fault for forcing that decision.

You are focusing on the victims of a fucked up Saw torture conundrum. I would also prefer a Democrat to a Republican, but I find it cruel to tell victims to vote for their continued oppression. This is not the time for Democratic candidates like Turek to be putting on their Jigsaw masks and asking voters if they want to play a game.

[-] minnow@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago

The only thing worse than Democratic candidates throwing trans people under the bus are progressive voters who hand victory to the fascists because of purity politics bullshit.

I'd rather Democrats take my rights away than let fascists burn the world to the ground. For fucks sake, some things are more important. Have some goddamn perspective.

Besides, if a transphobic Democrat wins we still gave a chance to convince them they're wrong. You ain't getting that chance with a fascist. Why would you give up the chance to advocate for change, just because that change is needed in the first place? That makes fucking no sense.

I hate it here too. Please don't make it worse than necessary.

Sincerely, A trans person

[-] baines@lemmy.cafe 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

thank fuck, a rational take

i would like to believe people are just dumb and not lying but there is so much both sides same so don’t vote bullshit on lemmy

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
87 points (95.8% liked)

politics

31542 readers
3046 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS