395
Hakeem Jeffries Says Impeachment and Getting Even Aren’t Priorities
(newrepublic.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
395 points (97.6% liked)
politics
31796 readers
5255 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Just more pathetic leadership from Democrats.
Just like with Chuck Shumer's no energy, no plan speech, this Chucklefuck doesn't lay out a single concrete item he and his centrist buddies would do to lower anything for the American people.
Polls show that American voters were concerned with the economy and DEMOCRACY as the two major points in the election. That includes holding Trump AND his Republicans to account.
I expected nothing more from these worthless neo-liberals and they can just Chuck off along with the Baileys.
Getting rid of Jeffries is such a massive priority at this point. Where can pressure be applied?
Call, don't email or write, your local congress person and respectfully state you sorely disappointed in the current leadership's refusal to hold Trump and his Republican enablers to account for his XXX actions. With XXX being specific items like ICE operating outside the bounds of their judicial capacity and murdering civilians or his abuse of power with the Iran war or him pooping his pants on TV.
My representative is a Trumptard and was reelected. 😞
Sorry to hear man. Still when I was represented by a MAGA moron, I did get some enjoyment in being that annoying thorn.
Both. Both need to be gone immediately
I don't think New York has a process to remove elected officials so it would gave to be done in the House and the Senate.
That doesn't mean they can't be removed as soon as possible from leadership and anything else with power. Barely trust them to vote
Here's a script I wrote for you to use calling your rep:
https://lemmy.world/post/53986664/26691191
Thanks! I just did this for my guy in WA, Rick Larsen. Tried calling, but VM inbox full so I sent a message cribbed off your spiel. Also sent to a couple buddies in other WA districts.
Nice! I have a feeling they'll need to be reminded closer to January, but I hope we can drill it in early.
From this point onwards, it's the main thing we should be acting towards to change the dynamic within the party.
Your first sentence should also include neo-liberal to specifically identify which democrats are failing even after they’ve been handed an inarguable, historic mandate to go after corruption and crimes. There were democrats elected last night who ran on changing the status quo in the nation and in their own party. Lumping them together is either accidental negligence, ignorance (clearly not as you later identified neo-liberals as the problem), or malicious. I sure hope no one is automatically reaching for the gun to shoot their own feet right out of the gate before anyone has been sworn in.
Lmfao. Swing voters didn't give two shits about Democracy.
They voted in Trump after impeachment and they repeatedly vote Republican after citizens United.
Give your head a shake bud, this win was entirely about cost of living.
Got to love people who comment and don't bother to read.
Lmfao, ok bud. People can say whatever they want on polls.
The reality is that the corruption and attacks on democracy have been ongoing for decades but the blue wave didn't happen til gas prices went up.
Give your head a shake bud. Anger and vindictiveness will get you nowhere.
LOL!
Swing voters don't care about Democracy and when swing voters say they care about Democracy it doesn't count because swing voters say things!
Fucking hilarious! That's some serious weapons grade MAGA thinking right there!
Look bud, if you've got anything to back up that the election was won only on the economy, I'm all eyes here. Back your feels with some actual facts MAGAat.
How is this hilarious? It's literally just pointing out that there is a difference between saying you care about something, and looking at the data of what actually changes votes.
Democracy has been under attack for decades. Swing voters did not care until it drove up gas prices.
Do you not remember that Trump got re-elected after being impeached, enacting numerous anti-democratic policies, and generally trashing democratic norms in the campaign? Voters still voted for him because he said he would bring down gas prices.
CNBC polling backed that up, they found that 9/10 voters cited the economy as their top concern, and one of the major differences between last election and this election was that last election a plurality trusted Republicans with the economy and this election a plurality trusted Democrats. What would actually answer the question is seeing what the top concern was amongst people who voted Republican last time and Democrat this time, or those who voted Republican last time but stayed home this time.
Wow, you're really bad at this.
Let's take a look at your source, which btw, doesn't show any of the raw data which is always disappointing but onwards regardless.
Cool, economy is a major factor and even I stated in my post that it was a major driver and supports your original argument that the election was driven by worries about the economy. Cool, common ground.
....wait that's not the economy...
....Well damn, that's not even close to the economy....
Oh and then there's this:
Oh really, it's a collaborative effort?
Let me pull up my original source I posted.
Oh would you look at that, I bet you the same takeaways that your source cited, including the war and ICE came from the same voter poll, just with a layer of opinion.
Enough of that scenic route, sorry about that, let me get back on track.
So, your own source, which is based the same source as my citation outlined multiple issues that voters said were important to them and what drove them to vote. Yes the largest concern is the economy and I did not dispute that at all in original comment. I asserted that there were multiple things that factored in this election including the economy and including democracy, which that's the war, that's ICE that your source references. Most people are not single issue voters since we are mostly capable of holding my multiple opinions of varying importance, which your source acknoweldges.
Your assertion, and I'm going to quote you here, your original argument
Your own source completely refutes your argument right there. There's a difference between saying X was a major driver and your assertion that it was the only driver.
Also, because I like to drive a knife further on why your argument is bad, let's take a look at a CNBC poll that they did right before the election since you like that source.
Corruption is voters’ top issue ahead of midterm election, CNBC survey shows
Man, you're really bad at this.
ETA: Just to also post this from my source:
Notice that this continues to bolster my original argument that both the economy and democracy/holding people accountable were the major drivers in this election.
48% of Democrats say democracy/accountability is important, 28% of "Independents" also cite democracy/accountability. But again, according to you swing voters will just say anything and I'm sure you'll twist yourself into saying that ~30% is insignificant and means nothing. Probably something like "Look at the Republicans, they don't care about democracy, it's not important to anyone then, checkmate atheists!"
Lol, says the person who communicates like this.
You still refuse to acknowledge the difference between what people say they care about and what actually motivates them to change their vote.
Read and understand your own sources as well as reading and comprehending your own argument because clearly you don't.