701
Anon is looking for a router
(lemmy.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2026
701 points (98.6% liked)
Greentext
9004 readers
627 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
You don't use wifi cause you believe it gives you wifi cancer.
I don't use wifi cause a $6 ethernet cable gives me faster and more dependable internet.
We are definitely not the same.
What if you have rectal cancer after years of inserting a ethernet cable int your ass for more dependable orgasms?
He said Internet, not intercourse.
what is the difference? they both go in your ass AFAIK
The $25 USB-C to ethernet adapter for my phone and constantly stumbling over the cable I'm dragging around gets a bit inconvenient at times though.
You could use a wireless cable
Skill issue.
OSI network layer-8 issue
Peasant.
I have my ethernet cable connected to a space elevator. Vertical line straight into orbit. I get faster satellite style internet than anybody in the world AND airplanes have to plan their route around me.
Latency and reliability I can see, but at this point the bandwidth has become pretty immense that I would have a hard time saturating it.
I wired up my office, and when I speed tested it, the shitty Ethernet adapter in my USB-C dock was slightly slower than just using wifi.
I had a similar experience moving into a new apartment that had ethernet sockets in all the walls. Took me a while to realize that the cables connecting the sockets up were oldschool Cat5 (100Mbps max) cable, so even though I was plugging Cat6a into the wall it didn't do a lick of good. Wi-Fi 6 on the other hand is giving me a little under 1Gbps.
You can pretty reliably pull 1G with cat 5 over household distances (10m or so). More likely it's the equipment limiting the speed.
Could be all the way down to 2 wire cables if they cheaped out hard enough
Nah you need a minimum of two pairs for an Ethernet connection.
Ethernet over coax was very popular until CAT cables replaced them.
https://www.microchip.com/en-us/products/interface-networking-connectivity/ethernet/single-pair-ethernet
There's hardware that does it with one
Interesting edge case. Not really relevant though.
It is part of the ethernet standards now, though