20
De-google setup part 2
(lemmy.world)
submitted
5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
by
OppositeMeaning@lemmy.world
to
c/degoogle@lemmy.ml
Universal prefernces:
- Lightweight
- FOSS
- Resource-effeciency
- Offline-capable
Nice-to-have but non-garenteed features:
- Eco-friendly
- Decentralized
- Complete independence from original service. Use frontend if possible
Avoiding alternative software developers (or companies/cooperations), only use their products as a last resort:
- Proton
- Mullvad
- Tuta
- Mozzila
- FUTO
De-Boogle
Boogle Search:
- SearxNG
- Marginalia
- YaCy
Boogle Chrome:
- FREE Browser
- Librewolf
- Tor Browser
Boogle Mail:
- Service provider - mailbox.org with a custom domain
- Client:
- FairEmail
- Posteo
- Thunderbird
Boogle Maps:
- Modified PWA - Gmaps WV
- Map data - OpenStreetMaps
- Client - CoMaps
Boogle Gemini:
- Duck.ai
- Ollama
Boogle Play:
- Repo:
- F-Droid
- IzzyOnDroid
- Obtainium
- Client - Aurora Store
- Client for repos:
- Droid-ify
- ObtainX
YouTube:
- Platform - PeerTube
- Frontend - Invidious
- Frontend instance - materialio.us, ytchocolatemoo.com, Self-hosted
- Client:
- FreeTube
- PlasmaTube
Boogle messages:
- Fossify Messager
- NovaDial
Boogle My Files:
- Fossify File Manager
VirusTotal
- Veto
- Hypatia
Android - GrapeheneOS
Android Auto - Phone stand for car
De-Microslop
Windows:
- CachyOS
- Nobara
Office (or "Microslop Copilot 365"):
- MA Office
- LibreOffice
- OnlyOffice
De-Meta
Facebook and instagram:
- Platform - Mastodon
- Client for platform - Smither
WhatsApp - SimpleX Chat
De-ByteDance:
TikTok - Loops
CapCut:
- LibreCuts
- Kdenlive
Hypic (photo editor):
- Pocket Paint
- Pinta
- Inkscape
- GIMP
Gaming
- Minecraft:
- Luanti
- Cubys
-
Universe Sandbox - Galaxy Engine
-
Space Engine - Celestia
-
Territorial.io - OpenFront
-
Tetris - Block Drop
-
Wordle - Code Word
-
Friday Night Funkin - Etterna
General internet:
Domain name system:
- Adguard DNS
- NextDNS
- Quad9
Virtual private network:
- Manual Wireguard VPN tunnel
- Manual OpenVPN tunnel
- Tor Network
Proxy:
- HTTPS Proxy
- SOCKS5 Proxy
- Tor Proxy
(not really related for De-googling or opensource but mpreso for de-bloating) File types and codecs (wheneber possible):
.png/.JPEG:
- .webp
- jxl
.exc:
- .ods
.mp4:
- .webm
- .VP9
.mp3:
- .OPUS
- .m4a
Other:
Reddit:
- Platform - Lemmy
- Frontend - Redlib
- Frontend instance - saferreddit.com, self-hosted
Github:
- Repo - Gitlab, Codeberg
- Frontend - Gothub (no chosen instance yet)
New additions:
- Privacy Flip
- Shizuku
- Canta
- EnforceDoze
- SaverTuner
- Wine
- Virtual Box
- Librefind
- sustysubs.net
- Yagni Launcher
- LTE Cleaner
Useless reccomendations for me:
- Termux
On the sidelijes of comsideration:
- WizeStream (NewPipe fork)
- Flow (YouTube client)
- Skylib (Bluesky client, unlikely to actaully use)
Could use reccomendations for:
- Linux file manager
- Linux non-cloud-based photo gallery
- Long-term Linux distro if I find my beginner-friendly distros a bit pale in the future
Remaining questions:
- If you tested or use QubesOS, how's the experience?
- Do you use a non-Linux-based FOSS operating system (like ReactOS)? If so, how's the experience?
- Any alternatives I missed?
- Any other software categories I missed?
- Any other new additions that I missed?
What does ",liscense that fit with the open-source ecosystem" means? How does it not fit? Why?
Once again, but why?
Liscensing is very important. It's like a policy for the developer to obey. Liscenses that fit with the OSS spirit: MIT, any GPL liscense, Apache. They need the developer to compky that their apps' code should be easily modifiable, be public, and not allow unneccessary trackers when on F-Droid or Flathub. Also, raw Firefox isn't open-source because it doesn't have an open-source liscense
Nothing of that is blocked by FUTO license. Also Grayjay is on flathub.
I heard the modifying the source code is blocked
Once again, who blocks what? And why you heard about it, not read? it is freely available, https://gitlab.futo.org/videostreaming/grayjay/-/blob/master/LICENSE.md What part of this license does not allow modification? Or what part of text makes this project not being open source in your eyes?
I know, what license is, but I do not know why you do not consider FUTO license to not be open source? what is "OSS spirit"?
I heard that the liscense FUTO uses doesn't fit into the OSS spirit (OSS stands for "open-source software")
You heard? Did you even read the text of their license?
By which metric? By whom? Why?
I know the meaning. What I am asking is what the heck is "OSS spirit". And what makes one open source project to have "spirit" and other to not have said spirit?
Just look at their products at "isitreallyfoss.com"
Why should I base my opinion on someone's else opinion from some website?
Also, why do people trust security audits? Why do you trust the people who made the software for you? Why do you trust others?
I do not trust them
\(ツ)/... Then how are you using software? If you don't trust software devs, then how are you using it to argue with me on Lemmy?
Using it by assumption that if things will go wrong or not as I wanted to — I can only blame myself. I would not be able to blame or sue authors of this software because most of it provided by "AS-IS" bases, that written in most licenses.
Blah blah blah nonsense words
Why is it "nonsense words"? I think I clearly explained what I meant.
Blah blah blah nonsense words at the end of da day don't care
It's not about opinions. Also, here's a screenshot from RedReader
Yes, you can not use it in commercially, and can not remove their payment stuff + attribution. You can share, modify, change, distribute it otherwise. What part of this not makes it open source?
"You cannot use it in commercially, you cannot remove their payment stuff" Brother, is this not restricting the use of the source code?
The same way that license of, say, MIT forces you to comply with itself (in its case provide text of license + you are not allowed to remove attribution), or GPL that provides it's own term in condition.
For me personally, MIT is what open source should be or even Public Domain, not GPL, hence why I am asking by which metric it is not open source.
For me being able to share, modify, distribute for free of monetary charge is Open Source. None of which is blocked by their FUTO license, as far I am aware.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40832506
So you consider something to be Open Source based on FSF and/or OSI definition? If that is the case, then I am even more confused on why you do not consider raw Firefox to be open source. In that case I can agree on why you do not consider FUTO licenses to be open source.
The word "spirit" can be used in many other contexts. Seems like you don't know basic internet speech more than degoogling terms
No, I specifically asking what "OSS spirit" means. What makes open source project to have "OSS spirit"? What it specifically means, so I can understand what you mean by something having "OSS spirit".
No but seriously, I can't explain it because it's self-explanatory-only
How it self explanatory? okay, provide then examples of what you consider "OSS spirited" and what is not "OSS spirited", maybe I will understand it this way, if it "I can't explain", please
... sigh You're a pain in the butt. Look, maayyyybeeee there's a simpler way to explain this, so if there's someone oit there that thinks differently than me (that's not val_ash@feddit.org), please do it. I often think too complicatedly
You are the one who use term "OSS spirit" without explaining what it means when I asked what is that, and then spent maybe 3 comments saying that I do not understand basic internet language
¯\(ツ)_/¯instead.Oops. Looks like we aren't repectful to eachother. Gotta report myself and you!
Seems like you really don't know about basic internet language lol