73
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026
73 points (92.9% liked)
PC Gaming
15928 readers
1176 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Is it though? The previous actor reprising their role is always a kinda nice little thing to have, but far from necessary. That role could go to someone else who would receive the pay, credit, and experience; and I think arguably it should.
Everyone is hungry for a "legitimate" use case and I don't think this is it.
Well, if you read the article, the entire issue is that this is an expansion of the game which will be intermixed with 1000s of lines of dialogue of the actor's old voice. Hiring a new person does not solve the problem of having the old voice lines mixed with new voice lines. Further, they are also planning to make an entire new game after this expansion, and the impression I get from the article is that they are happy to use the original actor with his new voice for that, and he's happy to do it; so again it makes no sense to hire someone new.
That’s cool how they will try to continue with the actor later.
Sometimes a change of voice actor completely puts me off of a series. Or the change of an actor in a show. Case: the Witcher tv series
The wig budget, no matter how large it was... not big enough.
😂😂😭
Well, you can feel sympathy for either actor, but it's not like a new actor is any more entitled to the role, and someone with medical issues who can't work the same way seems to call for some accommodations.
Either option prioritizes helping a real actor versus replacing them, so I think it's neutral - but that implies a legitimate use case.