1008
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 78 points 1 day ago

So we need to tax wealth so much that there is no money for surveillance. Got it.

[-] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 19 points 1 day ago

You son of a bitch. I'm in.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Uhh that just gives the government more money for surveillance. You'll get your surveillance either way, don'tcha worry.

[-] AmyAye@nord.pub 4 points 1 day ago

Not necessarily. You tax these fuckers into the ground, and now they can't pay to influence government like they do now. So we get back to an actual "of the people, by the people, for the people" government. Which means if the people don't want surveillance, then it doesn't happen.

Frankly, I trust a government minus corruption 10000x more than any profit driven corporation.

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2026
1008 points (99.6% liked)

Not The Onion

23000 readers
757 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS