this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
12 points (92.9% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1658 readers
3 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw this and thought it is really cool

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] absGeekNZ 1 points 1 year ago

Early stages, but it looks viable from the simplicity of it. That and you don't have to separate out the two types of plastic that they tested on.

The "burning" is in a sealed environment using "temperature-gradient thermolysis"; this is a type of thermal degradation that doesn't introduce oxygen but uses heat directly. Similar to how a cracking tower works in the conversion of crude -> useful hydrocarbons. Really the burning in the article was used as a metaphor.

Biodegradability will depend a lot on the final product that is being made, this process makes a precursor chemical phase.

There will almost certainly be incomplete conversion, there will have to be a purification step before it is fed into the next process. The real questions here are:

  • What percentage contaminant is present?
  • How hard (costly) is it to purify?
  • What is the waste product and can it be fed back into the cycle to be re-processed?
  • What temperature does the thermolysis occur at? (higher = costlier)
  • What is the temperature gradient? (bigger difference = costlier)
  • Does running this at higher/lower pressure increase efficiency?
  • How does this product compare to virgin material from crude oil -> the same precursor?

There are a lot more questions I could come up with, but the fact that the process is relatively simple and can take multiple types of plastic is what I found really exciting.