this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
12 points (92.9% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
1658 readers
3 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Early stages, but it looks viable from the simplicity of it. That and you don't have to separate out the two types of plastic that they tested on.
The "burning" is in a sealed environment using "temperature-gradient thermolysis"; this is a type of thermal degradation that doesn't introduce oxygen but uses heat directly. Similar to how a cracking tower works in the conversion of crude -> useful hydrocarbons. Really the burning in the article was used as a metaphor.
Biodegradability will depend a lot on the final product that is being made, this process makes a precursor chemical phase.
There will almost certainly be incomplete conversion, there will have to be a purification step before it is fed into the next process. The real questions here are:
There are a lot more questions I could come up with, but the fact that the process is relatively simple and can take multiple types of plastic is what I found really exciting.