Did National really just simply sell off state houses? (thespinoff.co.nz)

submitted 3 years ago by Rangelus to c/politics

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Really interesting article which serves as a good background to the current problem with state housing.

Tl;dr: Did National sell off state housing? Yes, but the net loss was only a few hundred. However, if you factor in the proportion of the total housing stoke owned by the state, we are short 43,000 state homes, and that's only for the rather meagre 5.4% of total stock.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] deadbeef79000 2 points 3 years ago

The net loss was a few hundred, however the number should have grown with population growth.

Do the nominal loss need to include that growth that didn't happen, whether value it was.

Then, factor in the growth lost every year afterwards too.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023

11 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Politics

903 readers

1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other LemmyNZ communities here

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Dave

RaoulDuke