NZ Politics

562 readers

1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Dave

RaoulDuke

On National Spreading Panic About The Economy (www.scoop.co.nz)

submitted 9 months ago by Rangelus to c/politics

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Great write-up.

In fact, the line “Labour and National had broadly similar fiscal approaches...” is worth repeating.

So the default position we should be applying to the current government is – where is all the evidence for the claims that Luxon is making?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thevoyagekayaking 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Labour really should have gotten a CGT in while they had the chance, and an absolute majority. In my view, their failure to make the most of that is why they did so poorly in the last election.

In terms of a wealth tax, I don't like the idea one bit, mostly because I believe that once you have bought something, especially a property, it should be yours to keep. If your primary dwelling was exempt from the tax, then I would look at the proposal a bit more seriously.

Otherwise, you make life hard for retirees etc.

[–] TagMeInSkipIGotThis 2 points 9 months ago

I don't think that way about property. I think it would be better to think about property as a right to use; and once you're not using it, or not able to use it to its fullest that right should revert back to the community. Life's only hard for retirees because we choose to leave people to the luck of what they accumulated during their life time. We could choose to take care of everyone if we wanted to.

[–] Xcf456 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Otherwise, you make life hard for retirees etc.

The wealth tax the Greens propose is specifically designed to mitigate this, as it wouldnt apply to the first $2 million net for individuals and $4 million net for couples.

[–] thevoyagekayaking 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They did think of that, but what are the chances that figure will be adjusted for inflation?

[–] Xcf456 1 points 9 months ago

I don't see why it couldn't be, either with some sort of legislated review period or formula to calculate the threshold.

In any case I'd prefer having one alongside our non-indexed tax system to not having one at all