this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
23 points (92.6% liked)

NZ Politics

563 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

From what I've heard, the problem with rail freight is all the double-handling loading and unloading it - you still need trucks in the city to do the final deliveries

[–] Dave 2 points 8 months ago

You should be able to counteract that with the fact a train can replace dozens or even hundreds of trucks (a quick google says up to 300, but I'm assuming that's an excessively long train), saving many driver hours.

I think (from my non-expert viewpoint) there's also a wider setup to make this more efficient. e.g. trucks carrying containers exist but aren't that common. Perhaps if you focused on a fleet of container carrying trucks where the containers also went on trains easily, you could make a really efficient process where you just have a crane loading truck after truck in 30 seconds each.

[–] TagMeInSkipIGotThis 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's really only a problem because the long distance road freight is run under a massive government subsidy. Rail has to pay its own way; whereas road pays for a fraction of the damage it causes.

By which I mean yes you have to double-handle to get stuff on & off rail wagons. But that's unattractive because road transport is artificially cheap.