this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

NZ Politics

562 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

News stories don’t just pre-exist somewhere out there, walking around intact and whole, waiting for an equal chance to step through the door of a media outlet and into the public arena.

They exist in tiny bits and pieces, among heaps of junk and distortions and agendas — and the bits are selected, assessed, ranked, and assembled, according to the rigour and professionalism, or the whim and worldview, of the journalists and outlets involved.

Barry Soper chose to construct a pretty ugly beast out of their scraps. The Herald chose to parade it. Then they stepped back and let everyone else feed it, until the whole thing became something big and real-seeming enough to cause genuine uncertainty and fear, and to prompt genuine attempts to do the proper journalistic work of understanding what this new health initiative is all about.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BalpeenHammer 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What half truth is that, hammer boy?

the claim that the policy was changed to hurt white people.

Besides, imagine how long every news article would be if they had to contextualise everything. At some point, you need to assume a certain amount of prior knowledge.

A certain amount.

[–] Ilovethebomb -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who claimed the policy was changed to hurt white people?

[–] Rangelus 3 points 1 year ago

For a start, you did.

How is that not penalising us? How is that fair or equitable?

Who is "us" if not Pakeha?