this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
1717 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59631 readers
3017 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 338 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If this is true, then we should prepare to be shout at by chatgpt why we didnt knew already that simple error.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 246 points 6 months ago (6 children)

ChatGPT now just says “read the docs!” To every question

[–] Dave 200 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hey ChatGPT, how can I ...

"Locking as this is a duplicate of [unrelated question]"

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago

Chatgpt is going to get trained on thinking those two questions are duplicates and end up giving bullshit outdated answers to every question.

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 54 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And then links to a similar sounding but ultimately totally unrelated site.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Stack overflow was the pioneer of hallucinations.

[–] elvith@feddit.de 21 points 6 months ago

Nah, it just marks your question as duplicate.

[–] angelsomething@lemmy.one 6 points 6 months ago

Already had that happen with perplexity, like, no mate, I’m asking you.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Always love those answers, well if you read the 700 page white paper on this one command set in one module then you would understand… do you think I have the time to read 37000 pages of bland ass documentation yearly on top of doing my actual job? Come the fuck on.

I guess some of these guys have so many heads on their crews that they don’t have much work to do anymore but that’s not the case for most

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 17 points 6 months ago

You joke.

This would have been probably early last year? Had to look up how to do something in fortran (because fortran) and the answer was very much in the voice of that one dude on the Intel forums who has been answering every single question for decades(?) at this point. Which means it also refused to do anything with features newer than 1992 and was worthless.

Tried again while chatting with an old work buddy a few months back and it looks like they updated to acknowledging f99 and f03 exist. So assume that was all stack overflow.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

This message brought to you by chatgpt bot.