[-] vas@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

this is about enlightenment

For me personally, I see enlightment - especially that particular word - in the process of self-perfection and leaning the truth.

I mean, I don't mind that you have your opinion. It's just funny to me that you chose this word of all. One that has nothing to do with the reputation system.

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

"Negative attention is also attention". In the Linux community where we are in, the fascist DHH was already discussed at least once (in fact multiple times) in the last weeks.

I think suppressing this topic until they run out of money is a better strategy than every time trying to do holy wars. Of course the situation is different if you notice that the person whom you're speaking with may not yet know. That is not really the case in https://lemmy.ml/c/linux

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 days ago

Can we please stop posting about Omarchy? It's annoying.

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I guess you're right in a sense that, I'm not aware of anyone specifically getting money with the job "just hurt them somehow".

I don't know if people receive money to say other things though. Like that a googlified phone or other things are secure (when they're much less secure, and that can be proven in the technical realm). Do people receive money for that? I'm aggressively blocking all ads and barely watch any youtube at all, so I'm a bad judge for that. I've seen what looks to me as traces of that, but I could be wrong. So I'll take back my claim and just state that I merely have doubts. Maybe someone can add more information on that. If they know whether people are getting for saying that google is secure, or that some of the alternative firmware is just as secure. It would not be attacking GrapheneOS then, but it would be attacking and muddying the truth.

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I don't get why this is upvoted. Can we just forget that nightmare that Omarchy is? And ignore attempts to bring it back up? Yes 10 for million you can buy a lot of ads, so we'll have to tolerate some noise for a while, but it shouldn't last long.

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Both absolutely true, AND they live in a world where a lot of money is being paid paid to attack them. It's like elections in a corrupt country: on paper you may even have fair voting, but in practice there will be constant attempts at sabotage.

They live in a harsh world. Personally, I forgive them their paranoia. A huge chunk of security+freedom on mobile currently stands on their shoulders, and on PinePhone / Librem5.

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

I haven't even watched the video, but if the server would implement sharing via torrents, it would be perfectly horizontally scalable, at minimum cost for the server owner. (I assume from the comments that it's not what is going on at the moment though.)

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe some AI crawlers started to honestly report Linux instead of Windows as they possibly did before? Otherwise such a quick spike is hard to explain (unbelievable). Or did I miss any big news lately?

//I'm on Linux in the last 15 years and I don't even care that much about what unrelated to me people use, although I always do help fellow Linux-ers when I encounter them in the wild.

8
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by vas@lemmy.ml to c/librewolf@lemmy.ml

Hi! How do I disable search with the address bar?

When I type things in the address bar, I want it resolved as a URL and never sent to a search engine. (If I do want to search something, I prefer to use the bar on the right.)

How can I achieve this in LibreWolf?

UPDATE: solution by @hobata below works. You need to set keyword.enabled to false in about:config. Or you need to create a file ~/.librewolf/librewolf.overrides.cfg and write defaultPref("keyword.enabled", false); in it.

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 44 points 9 months ago

Grok this grok that...
I'm sorry, but ***k grok. Stop posting about it.

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 59 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Mike: rachel and i are no longer dating

rachel: mike that's a horrible way of telling people we're married

224
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by vas@lemmy.ml to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

A video by "Not Just Bikes".

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 48 points 9 months ago

One important thing to keep in mind: it's not only the person who killed the cyclist. It's probably the system and how it's designed, too. For example, was the "50kmh" limit just a label, or was it enforced and made intuitive with road turns and speed bumps too?

The "justice" system and how it worked here feels like a crime though, to be honest.

208
submitted 9 months ago by vas@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Contrary to headlines suggesting the EU has “backed away” from Chat Control, the negotiating mandate endorsed today by EU ambassadors in a close split vote paves the way for a permanent infrastructure of mass surveillance.

While the Council removed the obligation for scanning, the agreed text creates a toxic legal framework that incentivizes US tech giants to scan private communications indiscriminately, introduces mandatory age checks for all internet users, and threatens to exclude teenagers from digital life.

The article is non-paywalled, freely readable on the link --^

Including it here because Chat Control goes against the spirit of Open-Source technologies (which are usually meant and built for control over one's device, privacy, trust... and no black boxes analyzing the content of messages you're sending to your partner).

224
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by vas@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Contrary to headlines suggesting the EU has “backed away” from Chat Control, the negotiating mandate endorsed today by EU ambassadors in a close split vote paves the way for a permanent infrastructure of mass surveillance.

While the Council removed the obligation for scanning, the agreed text creates a toxic legal framework that incentivizes US tech giants to scan private communications indiscriminately, introduces mandatory age checks for all internet users, and threatens to exclude teenagers from digital life.

The article is non-paywalled, freely readable on the link --^

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 41 points 9 months ago

Why should we care about an AI tailored to that one person whom many consider a fascist?

Negative publicity is also publicity. Please let's rather ignore this stupidity.

215
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by vas@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

TL&DR; there's a local win but it's not over yet. We need to push so that even "voluntary" surveillance is not allowed. Full post below.

The Danes will seek to propose a voluntary detection regime in the CSAM proposal, instead of controversial mandatory detection orders

The Danish Council presidency is backing away from pushing for mandatory detection orders in a legislative proposal that aims to tackle the spread of online Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), the country’s justice minister said on Thursday.

Earlier in their presidency, Denmark had revived a controversial provision in the draft law that would mean online platforms – such as messaging apps – could be served with mandatory CSAM detection orders, including services protected by end-to-end encryption. However opposition from several other EU countries derailed any agreement in the Council.

Today, Danish Justice Minister Peter Hummelgaard told local press that the Council presidency would move away from mandatory detection orders – and instead support CSAM detections remaining voluntary.

The presidency circulated a discussion paper with EU country representatives on Thursday, aiming to gather countries’ views on the updated (softened) proposal in a bid to find a compromise, Euractiv understands.

The Danes are concerned that if no agreement is reached on the proposal even voluntary scanning will not happen once the current legal scheme that enables that runs out in April 2026.

The CSAM proposal – dubbed “chat control” by opponents – has repeatedly failed to achieve support in Council, which has spent years trying and failing to agree its negotiating mandate.

Earlier this month, Germany’s justice minister came out against the plan, with a strong-worded public statement that attacked “unjustified chat monitoring”.

The mandatory detection orders contained in the original Commission proposal have proven to be the biggest sticking point – triggering major privacy and security concerns.

Critics warn that such an approach risks opening the door to mass surveillance of European citizens, as well as pointing out that it would run counter to existing EU laws that seek to ensure data protection and the privacy of communications.

If the Danes manage to find a compromise in Council on a version of the CSAM proposal that strips out mandatory detection orders the draft law could progress towards trilogue negotiations with Parliament, finally moving on from years of deadlock.

7
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by vas@lemmy.ml to c/mechanicalkeyboards@lemmy.ml

Just found this design and I think it's totally awesome. The new super-small switch PG1316M is used to fit 3 rows into such a constrained space.

Wonder if you could even get away with 4 rows of this, especially to somewhat compensate for the lack of thumb keys? I'd personally be interested to try 4 rows even for a more conventional tabletop keyboard.

EDIT: I have accidentally erased the main URL when I tried to upload a picture. Apologies. (Didn't know Lemmy works this way). Here's the main URL for this thing: https://www.reddit.com/r/ErgoMobileComputers/comments/1npnj85/btyp_a_mini_pg1316m_switch_keyboard_for_use_on_a/

7
submitted 1 year ago by vas@lemmy.ml to c/signal@lemmy.ml

Hi! On the official web page for "Proxy Support - Signal Support" they mention that setting a proxy is not supported on the desktop clients.

However, when did such labels ever fully deter skilled Linux users?

My question is, did anyone succeed in rootless SOCKS5 configuration for Signal? I know it can be done with e.g. a new network namespace by executing a series of root commands. For example, like whonix does to put Signal-desktop in Tor. Is there anything a bit more gentle and localized? Ideally I'd include it into a bubblewrap (bwrap) configuration that I already have around.

If you've looked into that at any moment but didn't find any straightforward solutions, please write as well. It's OK, but still valuable to read.
Thx!

5
submitted 1 year ago by vas@lemmy.ml to c/melbourne@aussie.zone

Good day! I'll be flying to Australia soon, and I'm interested in trying public transport (even if it's good or not always good, I want to see what's there). Which apps would you recommend?

// I've tried googling the question, but somehow get 20-minute videos with animated characters and nonsense like that. I think I'll trust recommendations from this community by a lot more 💚.

I'll be in Melbourne, Adelaide and Sydney.

16
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by vas@lemmy.ml to c/lemmy_support@lemmy.ml

Good day dear Lemmy community!
When I try to use lemmy's private messages, I get the following warning:

Warning: Private messages in Lemmy are not secure. Please create an account on Element.io for secure messaging.

It is very good to have this warning! However, can it be improved?
When I first encountered this wording, I was completely unsure whether the DMs would be totally public due to lemmy's limitations or its open stance, or whether the messages would have a similar security to e.g. email where your trust relies on TLS and the servers involved.

My proposal would be to change the wording to something like:

Warning: Private messages in Lemmy are not End-to-End encrypted. Please create an account on Element.io for secure messaging.

Or if the team is open to it,

Warning: Private messages in Lemmy are not End-to-End encrypted. Please use a platform with E2E encryption for private messaging.

Or if the team is even more open to it,

Warning: Private messages in Lemmy are not End-to-End encrypted. Please use a platform with E2E encryption for private messaging. Lemmy recommends Element.io and XMPP.

Thoughts? I'm ready to create a PR.

23
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by vas@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

JXL = JPEG XL file viewer for Android recommendations? The format is not natively supported by Android yet, it seems. However, apps could still support JXL. Which ones would you recommend for viewing the photos?

Note: this question has been asked before on reddit here: https://www.reddit.com/r/jpegxl/comments/xh72kl/jxl_file_viewer_for_android/

I'm re-asking here for a rather FOSS perspective.

13
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by vas@lemmy.ml to c/hardware@lemmy.world

Hello Lemmy / FOSS / Hardware community!
I'm looking to buy a monitor arm. Any recommendations? Good brands?

  • I want it to have a spring
  • I'm prioritizing quality and durability

Context:
I have a monitor arm already and I love the concept. However, it's a 50 EUR (~=60 USD) "static" monitor arm and I want to upgrade this part. I know some monitor stands / monitor arms allow easy on-the-go adjustments of the height and angle. Which monitor arm to buy to have this feature? Recommendations? "Negative" recommendations (e.g. what not to buy)?

I have a single 6kg monitor + a notebook that can be left on it's static arm on the side.

I appreciate any feedback on this
Thanks!

view more: next ›

vas

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago