this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
624 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

10531 readers
1996 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

+1 Terrifying

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 5 hours ago
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Imagining a TRex with enormous bunny-shaped ears

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 67 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I've seen a lot of little birds hop around. Not only are birds dinosaurs, but the particular birds I've seen hopping are very similar in shape to a T Rex.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

I’ve watched scrub jays running around on my lawn, eating bugs, looking exactly like little dinosaurs.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago

Or like a pigeon with it's head motion while walking.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

My chickens run around very similar to the run we see of T-Rex/raptors in movies. They lean forward and low and run surprisingly fast for an animal with wings that they just tuck.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, that seems more likely from what I know about dinosaurs. Just saying, we already have birds who hop to compare to. The kangaroo idea just strikes me as silly

[–] s_s@lemm.ee 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Have you ever seen a real roadrunner?

[–] Driftel@discuss.online 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Seen one? I've caught one.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Seems unlikely. Which Acme products did you use?

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 9 points 11 hours ago

I heard it takes a super genius to do that.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 108 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 100 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] FatTony@lemmy.world 35 points 11 hours ago

Stop that, stop that! Go on, clear off! Go on, go away! And you, clear off! Bloody weather.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 11 hours ago

Bloody weather...

[–] unreachable@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

Circles in the glass of water intensify.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 74 points 21 hours ago (9 children)

I'd love to see an informed response as to why we think they ran instead of hopped. Is there a difference in the skeleton or muscles that would tell us?

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 28 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Skull weight alone would make hopping difficult. Their heads are huge.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

yep, the first thing I noticed was how tiny the kangaroo's head and upper body is compared to the legs. for the t-rex both the head and the upper body are much more massive compared to the leg's diameter.

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Maybe they tucked their huge heads and rolled around like rollerrats. Except huge.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 12 hours ago

first off AFAIK they don't even have anything near the amount of muscle in the right places to try hopping, but even if they did manage it i'm pretty sure their legs would snap in half when they landed and then as the rest of the body met the ground they'd crack ribs and stuff as well.

Imagine trying to jump around while wearing a dishwasher on your back, even if you're monstrously strong in every part of your body it's gonna fucking suuuuuuuuck

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 124 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 57 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh God imagine we'd actually found huge parallel footprints.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 38 points 13 hours ago

Then we’d know Jesus was carrying the t-rex the whole time

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 44 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Kangaroos hop because they can store a lot of energy in there Achilles tendon and use that to propel them forward without using much energy. It's good for covering long distances over flat terrain while using as little energy as possible , which is good for the Australian outback as they hop between small patches of vegitation separated by miles of desert. It's not that good for ambushing or quickly chasing prey in a rainforest like the t rex is probably doing.

There's also the issue of scale, a t rex's Achilles tendon would have to be stronger then steel cable and as stretchy as rubber to store and re use that much kinetic force from its weight.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Was gonna say, the tendon strength simply doesn't scale like that, rexes are way too massive.

Could see it for larger raptors though, except they're probably better off just running. Predators really need maximum bursts of speed and maneuverability, hopping doesn't give them that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 49 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 12 points 20 hours ago

Good point actually.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 33 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Most likely the weight difference would be the biggest issue here.

Same reason why to scale bug wings wouldn't let you fly, that square cube law can lead to some very unfun conclusions where big beasties are concerned.

Or some absolutely terrifying ones in Shin Godzilla's case.

[–] turnipjs@lemmy.ml 9 points 17 hours ago

SQUARE CUBE LAW MENTIONED

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if babies and adolescents hopped around? There's already the theory that T.rexs lived in family groups with adolescents catching lots of small prey and adults catching the occassional large prey and providing protection.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

hopping like a kangaroo is unlikely, but it would probably make sense for them to move like modern birds of the same size and whatever is the most similar ecological niche.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago

Chicky Hopping Baby T-Rexes Cannon!

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 46 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Probably something to do with strain on the body. Studies show T. rex couldn't even run. Maybe a fast walk. Additionally, the way the muscles attach to the bones probably don't support hopping.

[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The context of this comment is amazing.

Imagine a creature, that died over 65 million years ago (earth was at the other side of the galaxy back then) and yet we can detect how the muscles attached to the bone

[–] rooroo@feddit.org 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

earth was at the other side of the galaxy back then

Hoooly eff.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Right now you’re orbiting the galactic core (well basically, its very close) at 240km/s +/- ~30km/s (Earths rotation of the Sun).

And it still took 65 million years to complete less than half an orbit of the galaxy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 33 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

And what if they skipped daintily while holding giant lollipops?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

T Rex only known organism to lick its way to the center of a Tootsie pop

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

"Nurse said that if I were a good lad that I should receive a lolly!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 20 points 21 hours ago

The math maths

[–] darki@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Does the penguin fly? Mass/per/volume is a thing...

[–] geogle@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Mass per volume is density, and I suspect the Trex and kangaroo are similar (~1000 kg/m^3) so yes they'd both bounce in that case. I think what you're looking for is surface area to volume, which decreases rapidly as an object gets larger while maintaining geometry.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 11 hours ago

It's worth noting that most extinct dinosaurs were probably more similar to surviving ones (i.e., birds) than to mammals and reptiles when it comes to bones and respiratory systems, and, by extension, density.

That is to say, they probably could get that big because they were quite literally full of air.
Some of them (especially sauropods, but maybe also other big species like tyrannosaurs) probably had even more complex and efficient air sac systems than modern birds...

load more comments
view more: next ›