this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
242 points (98.0% liked)

Fediverse

28080 readers
1172 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Could I use my lemm.ee account and connect to it somehow?

Edit: signed up using my lemmy user (user@lemm.ee) I have no idea if this will work or not.

[–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Nope, Lemmy does not support OAuth.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Damn that sucks. Cause I tried to sign up under another email and it says the user is taken

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Just a tip for the developer/sysadmins of loops.video, as a developer myself: Seems like loops.video has no DKIM or SPF configured (if that's the domain being used to sent activation links/codes), so the tendency is for most email providers to block the mail or move it straight to Spam folder. The situation worsens when many users try to sign-up for an account, so loops.video sends a lot of sequential emails (which is something that could be seen as "spam behavior" by email providers). The developer should ensure that mail delivery is properly configured, particularly the trust headers (DKIM and SPF, as mentioned before) needed for sending emails.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 3 hours ago

Honestly just one or the other is OK. But having neither is an issue

[–] tomsh@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago

Is google recaptcha still only good option?

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

shorts are not my cup of tea. Pretty sure shorts have a negative impact on peoples attention span. I'd still be happy to see people watch their shorts on the Fediverse rather than at tiktok/yt. Of course, but still....

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago

Sorry I stopped reading your comment after four words. Could you condense it to a five second clip with another following on within a secon sorry I forgot what we were talking about

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Why do I need to create a new account for it? At least it should let me sign in with pixelfed account right?

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I just used my same Pixelfed login info

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

So, has anyone given it a try?

[–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

People seem to be waiting for the activation email

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

all the activation emails should be out by today

https://mastodon.social/@dansup/113346938783519339

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 9 points 12 hours ago

Kind of. All it shows for me is a registration form. When I submit it, they promise me to send an email with further instructions. So far, I didn't get anything. Honestly, they wouldn't have needed a countdown for that.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 30 points 22 hours ago

Storage costs is the biggest hurdle for decentralized video platforms. I wonder how instances will handle that.

[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

i'm really interested to see where this goes. i feel like a lot of the dorks (i say affectionately as a dork) who use the fediverse and people who do this kinda shortform video are two circles that don't touch, so this could very well die on the vine- no pun intended- or it could give the fedi the jolt it needs to enter the mainstream

[–] OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 hours ago

I didn't get on TikTok because I didn't like the content, not because of the format. If folks make good videos on Loops then I'm down.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm really skeptical of its success primarily due to the immense costs of hosting video. Peertube exists already, and isn't nearly as successful as Mastodon/Lemmy primarily due to its hosting costs.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah I wish there was a way to contribute to the hosting with torrent-like seeding. My phone can seed a torrent, but its not going to host an instance.

1 like = seed for 1 month seems like an interesting model

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Naah I thought about this before and came to the conclusion that this isn't that bright of an idea. Here's why.

Why's video hosting so expensive in the first place? Because it needs a lot of computational power, storage and bandwidth. All three things that a mobile phone does not have. If you make your client's mobile phone do this stuff, then you're going to slow down their phone, make it heat up more, make it degrade faster (because it would be drawing power from the battery) and take up a huge chunk of their bandwidth.

Think of how video calls drain battery really fast. It's just shifting the costs of hosting from the hosting side to the consumer side while making the entire operation a lot more complicated and a lot more inefficient.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Take out the phone part and allow users to host videos in a decentralised way on their home computers and it's a genuinely good idea though. I have a server running with plenty of storage and reasonable upload speed. I could easily dedicate a terabyte or so, as long as I'm not the sole hoster.

It would be a hell of a lot cheaper than dedicated hosting. The only issue is legal problems when someone is unknowingly hosting abuse material, which is something that happens from time to time on all services like this, and an individual could be done for distribution without the protection big centralised services have. You'd just have to hope mods are on top of it.

Actually something like a debrid service but for peertube might work. You can get huge amounts of storage for cheap because a lot of it is shared, you might ask them to host a huge torrent file, but most torrent files serve multiple users, so the cost is distributed. Peertube could work a similar way if it were more mainstream.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sure! Remember though, that you are funding this project using your own money. How much does your server cost? How much does the electricity to run your server cost? You would need Gbps speed internet. How much does that cost?

You would be funding this out of your own pocket. Thank you for doing that! Would there be a thousand more people willing to do this? What happens if you lose your job? What happens to the server?

As you can see, this is not a technological issue, but a funding one. If you can generate funding for this somehow, you have a very viable model! IF you can find the funding.

I am saying that funding this would be difficult. I see people just yapping about FOSS, but not funding it when the time comes.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

What are you talking about? I don't think you understood the concept of decentralised torrent-like hosting.

I'm currently talking to a peertube hoster about server costs, which I may be able to justify to host my own videos plus a little extra to pitch in for others who can't justify the expense. Plenty of professional creators could easily justify it as an exit strategy or backup for youtube.

These conversations are happening, just not with you, presumably because you're just being negative about it and not actually doing something, so why would anyone bother to bring it up with you?

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Ok, good luck on your project. We'll talk when any given peertube project (based on the donation based funding model alone) reaches break even.

I swear I've reviewed the finances about this a million times over. Funding models in their current form just don't work. Content creators getting free hosting from YouTube with huge audiences are struggling to keep themselves afloat. But whatever, good luck on your project I suppose. We really need YouTube's monopoly to end, so ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] Fitik@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use TikTok (around a hour a day) and use the Fediverse too(Mbin and Misskey fork), so I guess I am a target audience, so they do touch, pfft

Also there's Pixelfed userbase, I think they would like short form video platform, cause Instagram has it

[–] Voltage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

A lot of people watch short form content but sets of people who make short form content and who use fediverse doesn’t overlap for sure.

[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hopefully it's time it's not postponed 😄

[–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

Fingers crossed

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nice! I just wish it specified how short they're going to be.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 21 hours ago

new boot goofin'

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] ReeSilva@bolha.forum 6 points 1 day ago

Short enough for not be pants

[–] Fizz 14 points 1 day ago

Finally a place to post my tom shelby sigma edits.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago

A federated short video sharing platform. Basically YouTube Shorts or TikTok.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I think like federated TikTok/Vine

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

will it have direct messages? it would compete with snapchat a little too.

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

no, since Snapchat is based around disappearing messages