this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
559 points (98.9% liked)

News

23361 readers
3219 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

NASA administrator Bill Nelson called for an investigation into a report that Elon Musk has been having secret conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin while dually involved in classified intelligence contracts with the U.S. government.

“I don’t know that that story is true. I think it should be investigated,” Nelson said Fridayat a Semafor conference in Washington. “If the story’s true, that there have been multiple conversations between Elon Musk and the president of Russia, then I think that would be concerning, particularly for NASA, the Department of Defense, for some of the intelligence agencies.”

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is great, assuming Nelson or someone similar is NASA Admin after January and not Elon Musk. That’s a fucking terrifying thought.

I'd like someone else as NASA admin tbh... We need to axe the SLS.

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How can someone with that much money look like such a dork?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's the ugly growth on his neck. If he would just get that removed, we'd all like him much more.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

His head? I know! Ew

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think you're giving too much credit to surgery. He'd still be a huge dork. That little flap of skin didn't dress him in the morning.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I assumed they were referring to his head...

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh! Is that what that thing is? I still say he should get rid of it. It's not doing him any favors.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ooo please tell me Musk leaked some secrets… please tell me he’s about to get a dank cell someplace…. Unpleasant.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hmm... I want him to be in a dark cell, but I also don't want Russia to have any advantages because of what he did.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Russia is collapsing, probably somewhere around 2025-2026, hi-tech won't help them. So as a trade-off I'd take a little secret to putin for an unpleasant cell for musko.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then they sell that info to China. I'm still not happy about it. But I'll take it if it means Musk in a cell.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh yeah didn't think about that. Possibly to Iran and NK too...

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ohhhh boy. Don't fuck with the space program.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

The severely under funded space program? Oh yeah, that things super valued.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

Well, NASA sometimes works with sensitive info and projects of which sometimes can get shared with their contractors, SpaceX included. Having Musk going through with his escapades, acting otherwise unstably, and now talking with an unfriendly figure to the US. It starts to raise some serious questions regarding national security. NASA is more or less just bringing it to attention.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Just because they're underfunded doesn't mean they lack teeth. SpaceX isn't launching in the US without them.

[–] Crismus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

They're underfunded mainly because Congress would rather spend money through SpaceX instead of NADA, because they can make money from SpaceX and other private goons. NASA benefits all Americans, which is just Communism...

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Lol, everything in the states is under funded with the exception of the military, so it's a good thing the military doesn't need to send anything to space.

Edit: Apparently I dropped this /s

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm aware of this. I don't understand what point you're making though. Are you saying that SpaceX hasn't sent up anything for the military?

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

I think we're confused by what you're saying.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The military sends their own stuff up, NASA isn't involved.

SpaceX don't send anything up yet for the military but they start next year.

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/10/spacex-sweeps-latest-round-of-military-launch-contracts/

Frankly I'm more concerned about the military using Starlink than SpaceX rockets.

https://spacenews.com/pentagon-embracing-spacexs-starshield-for-future-military-satcom/

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Our entire intelligence network is dependent on the space program because satellites.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yank the fuckers top secret clearance IMMEDIATELY

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, AND nationalize spaceX

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Should have happened after he started fucking with Starlink in Ukraine to aid a hostile state actor. Insanity.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

It should be looked into.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

Half of America is reciting the narcissists prayer on their behalf right now.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Silly cheaf. We don't investigate billionaires

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Traitor trash musk

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

He didn't really call for it though... He just vaguely said that if it was true, it should be investigated - in a way that doesn't commit him to action.