this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
508 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39165 readers
2046 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The wealth of the 10 richest people in the world – a list dominated by US tech billionaires – increased by a record amount after Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential election, according to a widely cited index.

The Bloomberg Billionaires Index estimated that the world’s 10 wealthiest people gained nearly $64bn (about £49.5bn) on Wednesday, the largest daily increase since the index began in 2012.

Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, registered the largest increase with a $26.5bn addition to his fortune, which now stands at $290bn. The prominent backer of Trump’s campaign, benefited from a surge in the share price of Tesla, the electric carmaker where he is chief executive and in which he owns a 13% stake.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 202 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Guy making $8/hr: the economy is better now

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 63 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Any day now eggs will go back to costing what they did in 1992...

[–] nolannice@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree with this take. It's like people have the grocery prices from when they first started living on their own seared into their brains.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago

Don't call me out like that..

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Dems for decades failed to properly address social inequality, while proudly parading their politically correct talk about "communities", "affirmative action" etc. This is a feel-good talk for their white middle-class demographics, while actual people in actual "communities" felt like animals in a zoo with a bunch of aliens around them figuring out what's the best name to call them. At the same time no meaningful change ever happened.

Trump won Latino votes in Miami. Just think about how much distrust the other side must have built.

Stop blaming the voters. Look into the mirror and ask yourself how could this have happened.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

What's really funny about Trump winning Latino votes in Florida is that when surveyed, they went Trump for "the economy". So... my comment stands.

But yes as a Canadian, the results of the US election and the performance of the Democratic party are things I'll personally need to "look in the mirror" about.

Alternatively, I can appreciate how dumb American voters are, as 70 million of them vote to actively make their lives much worse. <3

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YoYoMa@lemmy.today 140 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don’t worry. It will trickle down any day now.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 47 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Piss trickling down on us would be an improvement

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I guess it's slightly better than the old "Horse and Sparrow" name which implies "Eat shit and like it".

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Like being on level 250 of the Platform.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

I was about to tell you about this movie called El Hoyo that was similar to your comment and then I realized we're talking about the same thing I just watched it in Spanish. lol

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

That's where that comes from, yes.

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 91 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

600,000 people diagnosed with terminal cancer each year in the US. 800 billionaires. Just saying, they will likely die before they even get sentenced. And it's entirely likely the billionaires own or supported companies that caused that cancer in the first place, or supported medical systems that didn't allow people to properly be screened or treated for cancer.

It's like if Walter White wanted to help others

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Thats the problem with Anarchy is they have resources and you don't so in open warfare they win every time.

You could try to form a large organization pooling resources for a specialized fighting force but...

Oh look, half of the USA just voted alongside the Billionaires. Looks like we're outnumbered.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 65 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good, these poor poor billionaires need more. I mean it's a goddamn travesty they aren't trillionares!

Geez people how fucking greedy do you need to be to accept a paycheck from these people when working for them? Can't you just be charitable for once and help them become decillionares?

I swear we're so greedy.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

This is what the American people voted for. They voted to give their money away to people who don't need it.

We've been warning people of this for more than 8 years now, trying to soften the blow. At some point we gotta realize that protecting these people might not actually be helping, it might just be enabling the grift by providing convenient cover.

Maybe we ought to just step aside and let these voters suffer the full consequences of their actions. Democrats need to learn that unlike them, many people only learn about consequences by experiencing them.

Sure, many others who voted against will suffer the consequences too. What are we going to do about it? This is how democracy is designed to work.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup. We all vote on the meal we will eat and lots of folk don't like the week old pumpernickel so won't vote for it and for some reason lots of folks like to vote for the dogshit with ground glass mixed into it because they think its funny to watch other people eat it.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

for some reason lots of folks like to vote for the dogshit with ground glass mixed into it because they think its funny to watch other people eat it.

The majority of the political videos showing up on my YouTube feed after the election was just right wingers laughing at "the left."

Their whole identity is hating others.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Interesting they all of a sudden have absolutely zero concerns that our "deep state" will roll in any second now to undo the election

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump on election night: "MASSIVE FRAUD IN PENNSYLVANIA, POLICE INCOMING!"

He wins big: "teehee, what fraud? I never said that."

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Trump is unaccountable, that's apparently his identity. It doesn't matter if he did say or didn't say anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 weeks ago

oh right. goodbye, biden's billionaire tax.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

$64bn so far.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So Musk's investment in election interference of what, a million bucks a day? towards bribing people to vote now looks like an utter pittance relative to what he made back in just one day.

Of course these guys know that investing in elections has a good ROI.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

For added perspective: spending a million as a billionaire is the same as spending $1 when you have $1000 in your bank account.

It is utterly meaningless.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Especially if you did it only 45 times or so at $45 invested and got $26,500 back a day after the election

[–] Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 3 weeks ago

Because of course it fucking did.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trickle down aaaaanny day now ....

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Surely, now everyone will be hiring for all kinds of jobs and competing fiercely for who pays the best and offers the sweetest benefits, across all industries... Right? :D

/s

:(

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It seemed really obvious, like, I had this thought before the election was called that I should start grabbing some stonks because the uncertainty dipped everything for a minute.

But I don't have money for stocks right now, I'm simply not in the position. (Okay I own like one, for my favorite (not starbucks) coffee chain lol)

And then everything jumps massively after his "win", because all the corpos are probably anticipating massive deregulation.

I probably would've been gutted on short term gains fees anyway lol.

That's how it works though isn't it? The secret is to already have a bunch of money and stock and general capital...then when it dips, it's not so bad, and when it surges, you win such a payout!

How ingeniously simple! /s

[–] Damage@feddit.it 12 points 3 weeks ago

Keep pulling and the rope is gonna break, sooner or later

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm waiting for it to trickle

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? We've been getting trickled on for years now. Oh wait that's piss.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

We're just being kicked while we're already down. The idiots who voted for him don't realize they're in the ground with us.

[–] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Thank goodness, they were having such a rough time of it

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

On the stock markets (worldwide) it felt like someone held back the whole time and then started investing large sums.

I also immediatelty scrapped all my plans about buying US stock. Everything has to be reevaluated 😕

Maybe I'll have to reconsider my Taiwan investments, too.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Berkshire Hathaway had built up $300B in cash reserves - maybe Warren decided it was time to buy?

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Makes sense. You'd want to hold back on buying until the market becomes clearer.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Elon looks like one of the pointing soyjaks in that pic.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

$ 214 per person

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

And this is only to begin with.

[–] uncertainty 4 points 3 weeks ago

I don't see in the article what percentage of this increased 'value' was actually spent on stocks. It seems such a house of cards to say the unrealised value of retained holdings is worth anything like the figure you get if applying the most recent trade's value to all existing shares. A value beyond a percentage of the company's assets and projected yield makes for a pretty risky game of hot potato for anyone buying in at the end and the potential for ridiculously overblown paper losses for anyone who got in at the start of the pyramid scheme with knock-on effects that propagate out to the real economy through the contagion of doomsaying. Bonds are a far more transparent way of raising funds and incentivise productive endeavours with good fundamentals as the company needs to pay from profits rather than offloading rewards to the system of finding another sucker (which can happen with bonds as well if sold before maturity in the belief that the issuer will be unable to fulfill their promise).

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago

It was a mad jump in the markets and it still holding

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 3 points 3 weeks ago

Must be nice...

load more comments
view more: next ›