Every person complaining in this article was actually blocking the footpath: because they don't think the kerb crossing is footpath they think it's their driveway, I imagine it's the same for the berm crossing that is actually public property too.

a vehicle parked alongside any part of a kerb crossing provided for a driveway or within 1m of the prolongation of the side of a driveway must be regarded as obstructing entry or exit.

It's endemic where I live, I assume it's the same everywhere.

I do however agree that the council should probably have advertised that they were going to start actually enforcing the rules.

I get it, storage of your vehicle is more important than everyone else's use of the roadway.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] _ed@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah def not own driveway.

[–] deadbeef79000 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I suspect, obviously without evidence, that the complainants probably also complain about having to mow "the council's berms" too, without a shred of irony :-)

[–] TagMeInSkipIGotThis 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the topic of the berm; I don't mind mowing mine but I really wish the council had free green waste collection for it given up here its pretty much 90% weeds and I don't want to compost those clippings into my own garden just to introduce their weeds :)

[–] deadbeef79000 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I find paying for green waste collection a little on the nose: it's valuable raw material. Especially when you're buying it back again as compost!

Our garden has been contaminated with weeds from other lawns etc. from mowing and DIY compost it's kind of annoying/disappointing.

[–] TagMeInSkipIGotThis 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, lawn weeds are frustrating, I compound it by refusing to water the grass when it dries out so its on me (and climate change) in part as well. One consolation is that you can't eat the grass, so in some ways it would be better to rip it all up and turn it to some more productive use anyway :)

[–] Dave 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I find this quite interesting. The rules about blocking a driveway don't only apply to being on the side of the road but also the public property part between the road and the privately owned section.

I wouldn't have parked there but I wouldn't have complained if someone wasn't blocking the route along the footpath. It's pretty common that places around Wellington don't have anywhere else to park.

I guess I can see both sides of this argument. Yes the council might be following the law (or might not be, based on the later part of the article), but it's not exactly well known and it's a bit of a dick move for the council to change their stance and not tell anyone, just double the fine then start handing out fines.

[–] deadbeef79000 4 points 1 month ago

but it’s not exactly well known and it’s a bit of a dick move for the council to chance their stance and not tell anyone, just double the fine then start handing out fines.

Agree whole heartedly. If it were purely about compliance then education is the first and principal step. That's it's essentially been stealthed in makes it look like a revenue grab (which admittedly the council is in dire need of).