this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
46 points (83.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43940 readers
457 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Giving money to Amazon, Wal-Mart, Microsoft, Google .etc

It's like, you can't have an argument for price gouging, when you're enabling them by spending. If people were smart, they'd stop giving them money 10 - 15 years ago and they'd be right now, trying to reconstruct so they can be more economically friendly than how they are now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 9 minutes ago

Building electric car charging stations without security cameras.

About 75% of the chargers are disabled in my city. The primary method of disabling them is roll up with a sawzall and just chop the cable off. Gets you $5 worth of crack, which is always a nice incentive structure when there’s unguarded copper lying around.

The only chargers that survive are in front of 24 hour businesses.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Believing public figures on camera, or on a dais with a mic in front of them.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

It's not about "smart" vs "dumb." People's ideas are shaped by their Class Interests and Material Coniditons.

[–] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Stop generalising groups of people.

I cannot think of a proper example rn, but I see this everywhere.

meme example

group a does x

also group a: says something contradicting x

This happens across the board, not only in political topics.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A person is smart. People, not so much.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Great movie

[–] goog70@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

they would stop wasting their money

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 4 points 11 hours ago

You're not getting cashback on your credit cards yous daft cunts πŸ˜‚ You're paying it in advance

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lps@social.trom.tf 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

@yogthos @NeoToasty 🀣 almost got it....just a bit farther;)

[–] Mesa@programming.dev 7 points 16 hours ago

Thinking that they have the "one simple trick" for everything when most matters are actually a complex network of issues where there isn't one answer.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Stop driving (pollution, deaths, cost of living etc) and remodel cities and town around PT and AT , restricted gun ownership

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How do people living with no PT or AT options stop driving?

Also, the working masses must remain armed to prevent even further class slavery.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I've joined three different unions and the only guns I've used were loaned to me by a representative of my country for a short period decades ago.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Okay I still can't go anywhere without a car tho

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

OP mentioned remodeling cities around public transport, I think that also goes for more rural areas. There's a solution for every scale : metro, bus, train, shuttle, etc.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 4 hours ago

I agree there are solutions, I have lived in places with great options. But getting things changed here is very slow and for now you still can't walk or bike, and there are no buses or trains.

Stop. Electing. Fraudsters.

Especially when the fraudster is a convicted felon.

[–] MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They would understand that socialism is not communism. Also you can have capitalism and socialism at the same time, you just have to give and take a little.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

They would understand that socialism is not communism.

Socialism has so many definitions that this can be subjectively true or false. This isn't even some trivial gotcha, the terms were used interchangeably even by significant writers of the 1800s. For another example, a socialist mode of production and a capitalist mode of production are contradictory.

If one wants to make these kind of broad claims without starting pointless arguments, they'll need to use a more specific term than 'socialism'.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

You're wrong about literally all of that.

[–] emmie@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Op probably thinks socialism == Scandinavian welfare states. Most online USA midwits don’t know the difference

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

That's what I think of about socialism. The democratic socialist Scandinavian countries

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee -1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

If you want your contribution to have any weight at all, you'll elaborate. As it is, it is just worth dismissing

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

So people can just say whatever shit they want offhanded and not be criticized, but if you want to say they're wrong you have to give exhaustive reasoning and proof for each and every thing, huh?

That's a really dumb thing to believe so I'm wondering if you just speak frivolously without thinking and would like to walk your position back a bit.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

As it is, it is just worth dismissing

If we dismiss dismissals, this will go on looping forever. The person they replied to did not elaborate on some very dubious claims, and as is, are just worth dismissing.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

I dismiss your answer !

[–] And009@reddthat.com -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Do you identify as an American per chance?

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I identify as your mom, loser

[–] And009@reddthat.com 0 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

That explains the lack of education

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 40 minutes ago

lol shut up dumbass

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm doing better now, but 15 years ago Walmart was the only option I had for food. Local/regional grocery stores were more expensive and I was living paycheck to paycheck with growing debt.

"If people were smart they would stop buying the most cost-efficient option" is really not feasible.

"If people were smart" they would read and stop putting oligarchs in power.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

β€œIf people were smart they would stop buying the most cost-efficient option” is really not feasible.

In fact, more and more people don't have the luxury of buying more expensive options.

Of course, stealing is an option, and I think 'If people were smart' they would accept that stealing from Walmart is not an ethical or pragmatic problem, but it's a risky behavior so I wouldn't criticize people for not stealing. [edit: see Fubarberry's reply]

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Stealing from walmart also isn't sustainable if many people are doing it. For example there were a ton of walmarts and other stores in the Chicago area that recently closed due to high theft at those locations. Now whole communities there are left without convenient shopping options, which can be a big problem for people with limited transportation options.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That Walmart CLAIMED were closed for high theft.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

You can look up videos of some of the stores that were closed, they were basically being straight up looted.

I remember seeing the videos, and thinking to myself how I didn't understand how they could afford to stay in business like that. So when they announced they were closing those stores for theft, I didn't really think the given reason was ever in doubt.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago

"β€œThe decision to close a store is never easy,” company officials said in a statement. β€œThe simplest explanation is that collectively our Chicago stores have not been profitable since we opened the first one nearly 17 years ago.”

The stores lose tens of millions of dollars a year, according to the company, a figure that nearly doubled in the last five years despite numerous strategies to boost performance, including building smaller stores, offering local products and building a Walmart Academy training center."

https://news.wttw.com/2023/04/12/walmart-closing-4-chicago-stores-company-says-losses-have-doubled-last-5-years

Doesn't sound like theft was ever the problem here according to them?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

That we haven't learned more from history and keep making the same mistakes over and over.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago

Ignoring the fact that alternative voting systems exist and there can be more then two political parties.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

Voting for fascists/not voting

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Drinking alcohol. Lots of people drink way too much and make life ruining decisions.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Processed food and high sugar diets are killing us.

These foods are addictive, and ubiquitous. A well informed and smart american would still have a problem switching over to whole food only. (Where the ingredient label only says one thing).

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

Thinking that "being smart" means shit. We need to realize that the people who run things aren't necessarily smart. Presidents aren't necessarily smart. Professors aren't necessarily smart.

And being smart doesn't mean you're good. Evil smart is a nightmare, because destroying is so much easier than building.

What would we do if we were good? Now that's a question.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The obvious answer is fossil fuels, right? Few people want to cook the climate, they just can't quite fathom something that abstract and slow-moving, so they do it anyway.

Less obviously, feeding all our most sensitive data to random websites and apps. Again, the threat just doesn't look enough like a sabre-tooth tiger.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί