831
Texas ... refused to review 2022-2023 cases, citing a backlog.
"There's too many cases of maternal death, so we're just going to stop looking at them."
Good job, Texas.
It worked for Florida with COVID.
Gun violence, too.
"Lalalala can't hear you "
People suck sometimes, so glad I live in a very blue area with good community
Rape kits
Yeah I was about to say, pretty on brand.
Like the hundreds of thousands of untested rape kits that piled up over the decades.
Boxes about the size of a hardcover book each held evidence of a reported sexual assault – dried swabs of saliva and semen and blood, strands of hair, debris scraped from under fingernails. Each was collected from a person, most of them women and girls, during an hours long exam. And each was shelved without being processed for DNA. The evidence crowded storerooms, tangible proof of law enforcement’s failure to support victims and hold rapists accountable.
Testing the kits was supposed to be the first step in righting that wrong. In some places that received federal grants, not even that happened.
At least a dozen grant recipients carved out exceptions to testing, leaving kits unprocessed for a second time. In one California county, officials boasted they had cleared their backlog, but only after deeming more than half of their kits ineligible for testing.
In many cases, officials have done little beyond sending the kits to a lab, reviewing the results and again closing the files. In Maryland, according to a state report, some law enforcement agencies have shown “significant reluctance” to reopen investigations and have even stated outright that they are disregarding DNA matches.
What’s more, some officials all but abandoned the idea of providing victims answers about what happened to their rape kits or apologies for how long testing took. One Kansas police agency has tried to reach just 17 victims from roughly 1,100 sexual assault kits. An official there said there are instances where DNA testing has identified the names of suspects for the first time but the victims have not been told, because officials don’t think their cases can be prosecuted.
if covid taught us anything, it’s that the easiest way to make a problem “go away” is to stop collecting data about it
Ah yes, the too retarded to fail strategy.
Downvoting this is retarded.
Lol
I don't think I'll be on the right side of history here, but we're gonna do it for science.
Well shit boss, we made it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
No we’re only allowed to make fun of dumb (unable to speak) and lame (unable to walk) people.
That's fucking retarded.
Literally 1984
Like Trump’s drone strikes
You can’t make an omelette without killing lots of women.
If they were worried about birth rates before...
It's all ideology. They scream about not having enough white babies and then do one more thing to make the birthrate drop. But all that proves is the insidiousness of the other side. Gotta keep doubling down.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Red states have had the highest maternal mortality before the abortion ban/restrictions.
Just adding to the pile of bodies.
I hear CEO bodies are piling up.
load more comments
(2 replies)
if there isn't already a mutual aid network then start one. Women need to leave states where they have less rights than a dog while they still have the right to leave.
Not everyone has the means and opportunity to pack up and leave a shitty state.
if there isn't already a mutual aid network then start one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_aid
Give them the means and opportunity
They're saying it's our job to get them out.
load more comments
(10 replies)
This is what they want. Getting pregnant in red states is literally too dangerous. Their birth rate is going to hot rock bottom in the next 4 years. Women communicate about this stuff, so even if the government isn't reporting on it but the rates are so high every women will eventually know someone personally that died because of these bans.
They're not targeting us, they're targeting future women that won't know anything about rape, sexual assault, sex Ed, etc. once they complete dismantling the education system. If this trend continues, they're gonna get what they want. Organize, and be vocal outside of lemmy. Yes we're all talking about it, but no one else is. Talk about it, be unfriended, stand up or shut up.
And as a quick aside, imagine being such a colossal pussy, that you have to dictate what other people do because you're afraid of women and or your own sexuality. These are the people we're talking about about. I used to think that "oh no one is better than anyone else" but we absolutely have to be better than these people. They're fucking monsters and they're going to keep ruining our shit.
And then it will be normal and not a big deal
That’s my concern. It’ll go the way of climate change and school shootings.
The narrative will shift from “it doesn’t happen” to “there’s nothing we can do to stop it” to “why even bother? It’s normal so it’s not a big deal.”
To be fair, they can get away with this just because the anti-choice stance is so ravenous they have a self-righteous-sized blind spot for preventable suffering of others.
Sadly, this won’t be covered broadly enough or penetrate the bubbles it needs to for opinion to change. Even in 2024 only 9% of voters listed abortion as their most important issue. Where 48% listed inflation, “the economy”, or immigration as their most important issue. Draw from that what you will, but I don’t think the average voter understands the … externalities of strong anti-abortion measures.
Thank goodness none of them were CEOs!
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
831 points (99.4% liked)
politics
31362 readers
2155 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS