793
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 90 points 2 years ago
[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

I don't like that I like this

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Invented a whole math thing to justify his desire paths.

[-] egrets@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago
[-] Boozilla@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 years ago

This is why some places like Michigan State University and Ohio State University use "desire path planning". That's where they observe where people walk and then install (or move) the sidewalks to match those footpaths.

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago

Not necessarily good though since it further seals the ground. There's nothing wrong with leaving desire paths untouched.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago

The problem is they would either have to police people from using them, or let grassy areas become bisected by muddy ditches

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Is there an issue with muddy bisections? It might not look the most appealing but it's better than pavement.

To prevent the paths from getting ever wider you could, for example, plant flowers next to them. That's a pretty effective and unobtrusive way.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago

Mud is messy; muddy trails also aren't the most wheelchair-friendly

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Mud is messy

It depends. Some people view lawns that aren't devoid of all insect life messy or trimmed evenly messy. And if it is raining or has recently rained, hardly anyone would use a muddy path so the concrete sidewalk will remain reasonably clean as well.

wheelchair-accessible

That's important, though I'm not advocating for keeping an entire campus unpaved. I am arguing that only necessary pathways should be paved while desire paths should ideally remain unpaved. People in wheelchairs should still get around (quickly), but desire paths don't need to be wheelchair accessible in my opinion.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A dirt path, fine and great. Sounds nice for summertime.

Lot of schools aren't in a warm climate.

Those paths become unusable in winter, a muddy (unusable) slop when it rains or when the snow melts.

Muddy paths lead to wet socks and dirty shoes at best, and at worst, you slip and get covered.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, based on college conversations with groundskeepers, students tend to blaze their own trails to create the shortest routes. Besides injuries when they slip and fall in the mud, it also gets tracked into buildings, making those floors slippery as well. Paving popular paths is a way of accommodating human behavior.

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think there's an issue with desire paths becoming unusable during certain times though. It slightly extends the time you spend walking around but I'd prefer this over having unnecessary pavement.

You might as well pave the entire green space in this example.

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago

And why would paving the entire green space not be worse than only paving the paths people walk on?

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

I meant to convey how so much of the existing green space was paved already that paving the entire green space wouldn't be much different at this point.

I would guess the paved paths make up like 20% of the image? That's far too much in my opinion, green space in cities is already severely limited.

You can also see how every time a desire path was paved, new desire paths sprung up - which were then also paved.

[-] chloroken@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago
[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

Your feedback is valued.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago
[-] BambiDiego@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I wish I was high on the potenuse

[-] denaggels@feddit.org 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Haha, I wish I was high on the potenuse!

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago
[-] denaggels@feddit.org 3 points 2 years ago
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

thanks. I just thought the reference to the sub was too good to pass. (r/yourjokewbutworse except it isn't worse it's just the same joke... whatever you can't land em all)

[-] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

I like how your reply got more upvotes than BambiDiego’s. It’s like we got to watch the skit play out in real life!

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 years ago

So irrational this guy sometimes...

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago
[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

So am I but I still follow the rules!

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Considering his life and how he died, normal was never on the table.

[-] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Shouldn't that be Cauchy and Schwarz walking together? Since they were actually the ones to generally prove that the absolute value of the sum of two vectors are smaller or equal to the sum of absolute values of each of those vectors separately.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%E2%80%93Schwarz_inequality

Why, yes, I am fun at parties!

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, but you could just name him the "triangle inequality guy" that's note readable :D

[-] Hupf@feddit.org 8 points 2 years ago
[-] Klear@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Ugh, there goes that xkcd guy.

[-] MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

Where’s Euclides?

[-] untorquer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

They're just a bunch of squares

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wow, earlier today I read it as "Why can't this be normal" as in why are people regimented to stay on sidewalks instead of strolling across the grass? It reminded me of a guy I worked with in one of my first jobs, who was told by another coworker that you shouldn't walk on the grass, and he replied, "Yeah you should, because if you weren't supposed to it wouldn't feel so soft and cushy and good on your feet." I liked that guy's attitude.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If I remember right, there's a school that took the worn paths in the grass and just turned those into official walkways.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, that's a fairly common practice.

[-] JackLSauce@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

He's only 45 degrees from being normal whereas they're 90 so...

[-] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

I hate when people do that. Just stay on the sidewalk, you're going to wear a path down in the grass.

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

Should've been a path there to begin with, clearly. Bad design

[-] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

No. No weird hypotenuses. Vertical and horizontal paths only.

[-] Rokin@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Those are desire paths. I love them.

[-] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I hate them. It's not a real walkway, it's just people making their own and ruining the grass.

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
793 points (99.1% liked)

Funny

16224 readers
1390 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS