this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
724 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

61963 readers
3759 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] absGeekNZ 26 points 6 days ago

Life goals, don't fuck up so bad that even Nestle wont work with you!

[–] TseseJuer@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

so a south African is suing a swiss company in American court? why just why is this theatrical bullshit allowed to go on so sick of this already times be changing too slowly we need the next phase already

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Its an american company suing an american subsidiary of a swiss company. It makes sense. You dont have to try very hard to find the ridiculousness in these people but this isnt it.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 303 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Maybe asking advertisers to 'go fuck yourselves' isn't such a bright idea, fuckwit.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 192 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I’m honestly blown away that Nestle stopped or reduced advertising. It seems like twitter is exactly the home for such a terrible company.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 82 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not if there's fewer there to see ads. They're still a business with a bottom line, even if what they do is terrible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Nestle has an extremely safe, risk-averse marketing strategy. In part due to their various scandals, they try really hard to be family friendly and boring.

That said, they are not worse than other food and beverage conglomerates.

  1. child labor: mars & others were also implicated. These companies were most likely unaware of the child labor being used to harvest cocoa. The way it works is there are wholesalers in Africa who buy cocoa from processing facilities who buy fresh cocoa pods from local farms. These wholesalers advertised themselves as being child-labor-free. The farms they buy from were using child labor. This is a problem with capitalism exploiting people in the global south, causing perverse incentives, and with companies having limited insight into the full depth of their supply chains.

  2. water is not a human right: The nestle water exec said the quiet part out loud. But, no beverage company believes water is a human right - they just aren't stupid enough to say that on camera. If they did think it was a human right, they'd be working to ensure universal access to clean water rather than bottling it and shipping it around the world while limiting water access at their extraction points and polluting the water near their factories. Look at what coca cola is doing in mexico - rampant water pollution such that in factory towns Coke is the only safe drink for folks because the water is contaminated. Nestle is bad, but no worse than coca cola.

  3. infant formula scandal: this occurred in the 1970s and was obviously awful. Every major multinational food and beverage conglomerate has stories like this if you look hard enough - this just happens to be a fucked up series of events that got some major media play.

People online scapegoat Nestle, but continue to buy electronics and clothing made with child labor, tree nuts/soda/and other products known to be harmful to watersheds, and many other products from companies which harm people in the global south. This isn't meant to defend nestle, but to remind everyone that there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Nestle is not anywhere close to an uniquely evil company. Not even in its own industry.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 160 points 1 week ago (3 children)

All the defense has to do is play the clip of him openly telling advertisers not to advertise and he'll get laughed out of court.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most politicians are bought for less than a million. The guy has hundreds of billions. I imagine he can buy a few judges along the way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 136 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You know you've fucked up when even Nestlé doesn't want to work with you...

Obligatory Fuck Nesté

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The lesson here is to never start advertising on that platform. You’re less likely to be sued by Musk if you never start advertising in the first place. Advertising on his platform is an unnecessary risk for your business:

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Can someone explain to me how you can sue over a business choosing to not spend their advertising dollars on a particular service? I mean Elon specifically told his customers to “fuck off” and now he’s suing them?!? I just don’t understand these petulant little man children being so litigious when they get their feefees hurt.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Easy, you pack courts with shills, you eliminate government oversight, and then you do whatever you want.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nothing says you believe in free market competition more, than suing a another private business, trying to force them to give you money

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Railison@aussie.zone 83 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How long until Tesla sues me for buying a Toyota?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't know Citizens United gave companies forced speech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Can you please tag this elon, so that our spam filters work?

It's not practical to censor "x"

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Last year he told everybody to go fuck themselves. Now he's crying. If there is somebody who needs to be deported, is it his narcistic, selfish, apartheid's ass.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yea, in a sane justice system, that one tweet would rpget this case thrown out on day 1. In the world we now live in, I'm not so sure.

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In a sane world, this lawsuit would be laughed out of court.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 52 points 1 week ago

Hey Elmo, you told the advertisers to “go fuck yourself” in no uncertain terms, even repeating yourself for dramatic effect.

Hey I’ve got an idea Elmo. Go fuck yourself.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

If suing companies for not advertising on your platform made any sense, porn sites could sue almost the whole economy.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

i don't understand how it's a boycott or how is illegal or unfair

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"I ruined my business by supporting Nazis and it's all your fault!"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

How dare your company not advertise on my company cause I’m a racist wanna be nazi twat.

load more comments
view more: next ›