263
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 141 points 2 years ago

So, this is blatantly and egregiously unconstitutional, right?

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 50 points 2 years ago

A 6-3 Supreme Court majority says it isn’t.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

I mean, they haven't said that yet. While the current supreme court have made some genuinely insane rulings, they've generally at least made the pretence of trying to square everything they're doing with the constitution, albeit often in very strained or roundabout ways. I'm not sure if they'll be able to find a way to justify this (but I'm not ruling it out either).

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 11 points 2 years ago

They could justify it with the Chewbacca Defence, possibly replacing Star Wars names with arcane Latin legalese terms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah my only hope with some of this shit is that Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett actually have convictions and principles that they stand by (as horrible as those may be) and aren't willing to completely destroy the Republic in exchange for expensive vacations with a billionaire.

Not holding my breath though.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 33 points 2 years ago
[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 years ago

So is everything else he's doing but it doesn't seem to matter.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

And who's going to enforce that? Surely Amy Handmaid Barrett and company will get right on that.

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Creating an anti-religious-hate office is not, as long as it protects all religions equally. I don't think that's what this will do.

Sure, but to target "anti-christian bias" looks like being oddly specific about the religion you want to protect.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but they're explicitly saying it's only to protect Christianity, so that throws that defense right out the window.

Wow America! You really are doing everything in your hand to become a new medieval monarchy.

You have the absolutist king, the feudal lords, the hate towards any progress...

You were missing the inquisition. WERE.

[-] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago

We're apparently trying to speedrun European history into 4 years or less, but in reverse, and ending in the dark ages.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I have to say I'm impressed. You got almost there in less than a month. Right now you're missing a crusade (although the turd is working very hard on that front to "celebrate" it asap) and... maybe the public and gruesome executions, but I'm sure with enough hard work you can get there before the next year.

[-] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

No one expects the Ameriklan Inquisition!

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I'm too lazy to post the image, but I can imagine

Monty Python was / is great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

They are treating him like King David, this goes further back than even medieval!

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 46 points 2 years ago

Fuck you and your religion.

[-] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

And this is when things get truely crazy. You ain't seen nothing yet.

[-] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 13 points 2 years ago

the true fuckery hasn't even begun in earnest yet

[-] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I firmly believe that the fundies are trying to fulfil the prophecy of the book of revelation. Trump is playing the part of the antichrist, musk is the beast and I'm not sure who is playing satan yet but xi and Putin are both strong contenders. My concern is how the heritage Foundation interprets "lake of fire".

[-] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 6 points 2 years ago

I just think Trump is doing all of this shit because he can, there's nobody this time around that can stop him, we rightly tried locking him up in Federal prison for the rest of his life, and he really really didn't like being mocked by Obama during the Correspondents dinner. He's going to burn it all down, and so many people are about to die, here, and all around the world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

Remember how the radical right, most especially of the more Randroid type was saying that talking about Gilead states was hyperbole and hysterical, etc...?

Then they reversed 50 years of Roe. And now this insane piece of shit is back in the office, throwing red meat to the crazies that think this is a xtian nation (or that it should be one).

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 31 points 2 years ago

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

"Good news, Trump doesn't want Congress to have any power anyway!"

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 years ago

Dear US, wishing you a quiet revolution down the road to clean up this mess
Sincerely, a Quebecer

[-] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

Dear Quebecer,

Got any room?

Sincerely, a New Englander

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Yes, New-New-Frangland will be quite the powerhouse!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Thank you. I'm wishing the same for myself and my fellow not-pants-on-head-crazy people in this madhouse.

Yours,

  • Your downstairs, and trapped in a failed meth-lab of a country, neighbor
[-] graycube@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

The Inquisition? Nobody expected that.

[-] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago

It's kinda fun time travelling back a hundred years. Oh wait. No, no it isn't.

[-] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is more of a 600 year regression to pre-Renaissance if we're being honest.

[-] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

Yes but there is someone from within the last 100 years that he reminds people of

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago

Hello future handmaids, how are we all doing today?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

When did he last go to church?

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

During the BLM/George Floyd protests. There are photos.

[-] glitch1985@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

When's the last time he went in a church though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vala@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Can't wait till they have to codify what christians believe in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Where does the Mayflower sail to now?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

just to clarify, the Mayflower was full of puritans, who were being "persecuted" by being told they couldn't force their extremely narrow bigotry onto everyone else around them.

So, honestly, I'm all for shipping the zealots of to someplace else. They can leave the rest of us alone.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago

Trouble is there's not really any lands that some nation wouldn't object to a bunch of crazies being dropped off in. So either we'll need to ship them up to the moon, or force them to start working on atlantis.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Israel? They'd definitely object, but who cares at this point?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
263 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31007 readers
2232 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS