this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
254 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

62936 readers
5370 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Apple... Monetisation... Aren't they already making like a billion per day?

Greedy fuckers.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 84 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] freeman@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  • StreetComplete It makes editing OSM addictive and competitive!
[–] Slax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I love it though someojesomeone can easily make out where I live and work 🤦🏼

[–] Habarug@lemm.ee 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I switched recently, and it is really good. It doesn't have public transport yet (for the most part), and I rarely drive, but for walking, hiking and biking it is very nice. OpenStreetMap is shockingly well developed, I had no idea this existed. It has almost all the local businesses in my area, really did not expect that. It doesn't have restaurant reviews and stuff though.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My area was missing a bunch of businesses, so I added them. It's really easy, so definitely consider helping fix stuff as you notice it. I usually take the time to add metadata like phone number, hours, and website, because sometimes that's useful.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 16 points 3 days ago

@sugar_in_your_tea @Habarug there's an app called StreetComplete which gameifies this as well. Gets a bit addictive if you're not careful

[–] Nanook@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thank god it doesn’t… fuck that. Most times it’s bs anyway.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Nah disagree, I often check google maps just for reviews if I want to find it try a new restaurant. But I can imagine how difficult that would to implement in oss and most importantly, moderating it would be near impossible.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 46 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Apple claimed Apple Maps was created because Apple wanted to protect its users from Google Maps' data hoarding. We assume Apple is already hoarding data but now to be able to compete with other advertisement platforms Apple, would have to share that data with advertisers.

One step forward, two steps back.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Apple actually integrates several “anti tracking” technologies into their maps, so it IS an improvement in theory.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Looks like we are both skeptical about those technologies. "All you have to do is turn off locations... on a maps app... that's privacy!"

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well apparently they ask for directions to your destination and 5 random others so that it’s not trackable server side.

I haven’t investigated myself and that’s not entirely fool proof, but it’s leagues better than Google for privacy.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is. That's actually really cool.

But if they do start including ads, why would advertisers use a less effective and accurate platform than Google Maps?

Either they change or their ad placements are cheaper.

If they aren't maximizing profits then why put ads at all? It's not like they are losing profits.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Why put ads on a new venue that may reach users that don’t use Google maps?

Even if that ad is less effective, it’s still going to have some effectiveness

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They still collect data albeit less from Google Maps. But Organic Maps doesn’t collect any data.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I’m an avid user of OSM and OsmAnd, I’m with you there

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm not happy about ads, but ads aren't inherently anti-privacy. If they are not targeted at you based on tracking data then I don't see any conflict with privacy. for example, mentioned in the article:

For example, it reportedly considered charging for prioritization of search results in the app. It's also plausible that it could sell the ability to make specific locations on the map more prominent to viewers.

that would suck but it's not a privacy issue.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, this thing isn’t going to just enshitify itself, now is it.

There was a time when Apple was able to infuse some level of class into its products relative to competitors. I suppose they were able to do that because their growth was driven by exciting products. With their now listless and moribund product strategy, they have to cash in the equity they built up in customer experience to fund shareholder value.

Moribund (adjective)

Meaning: Dying or declining.

TIL a new word.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

apple is really shitting themselves. wtf.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Just trying to rake some of thst Google cash

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

they must see the writing on the wall for reduced hardware sales.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This article is from April 2024. So, where are the ads?

[–] Cat@ponder.cat 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I will post a new link, I did not notice the date of the article.

Edit: I changed the link.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s time for Tim Apple to retire.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Any replacement is subject to the priorities of Apple's major shareholders and its board. Those push for further monetization of Apple products and services.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not in my experience. Apple products and services are driven by the yay or nay of the CEO. The employees often push back on things as well if they have enough clout.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

If we look at other companies that have been in Apple's position, this seems to be a temporary state of affairs even if it lasts for a while. If the expectation is for profit to grow year over year (it is), as growth of market share stalls because you've already expanded as much as you could, you'd get pressed to find profits by exploiting existing revenue streams. That's the point when employee opposition stops working. Think of the recent events when the Google Search VP opposed the Ad VP's requests to make search worse in order to improve ads revenue. The Ad VP got appointed to lead search and the previous search VP got moved to a dark corner somewhere. Once you run out of profit growth in the existing revenue streams, they'd ask you to find profit growth by reducing labor cost. We also saw that happening in various companies over the last little while.

If Apple was a private corporation owned by some people who aren't looking for ever increasing profits, I'd believe they might not follow this pattern. But they aren't.

That's just my guess and the reasons behind it. Could turn out that you're right and Apple is an exception to the rule. I mean, I hope it does but I'm not optimistic.