473
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

The FAA is reportedly set to cancel a $2.4 billion contract with Verizon to modernize air traffic control communications and instead award it to Elon Musk’s Starlink.

Musk has publicly criticized Verizon’s system as failing, though without evidence. SpaceX employees have been embedded within the FAA, and some now have agency email addresses.

The move raises concerns about favoritism and conflicts of interest, especially as Musk’s companies have received $38 billion in government funding.

The contract transfer has not followed standard procedures, prompting resistance from senior FAA officials.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 177 points 2 years ago

Aha! Trump uncovers corruption within DOGE itself!

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 109 points 2 years ago

Oh, that seems fine. Just removing a 15 year, 2+ Billion dollar contract Verizon just won in 2023, with a no-bid contract from the guy in the officially unofficial roll of gutting the US government.

Drain the swamp! /s

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

This is NOT at all Corruption and in fact the United States Of American has NO Corruption at all and is the CLEANEST country in the World.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 98 points 2 years ago

Musk doesn't care anymore if he tanks Tesla, as long as he's getting government handouts.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Tesla’s shareholders might though.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

Good. Then the shareholders can sue and make things more difficult for everyone involved.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 10 points 2 years ago

He doesn't need the shares to be sky high if he can get the board to give him his giant payout.

Tesla’s law firm drafts Delaware bill that could salvage Musk pay package

The proposed legislation, drafted by Richards, Layton & Finger, or RLF, would amend Delaware General Corporation Law, and if adopted, could pave the way for the reinstatement of Musk’s 2018 CEO pay package at Tesla, worth tens of billions of dollars in options.

[-] KY13KR385@lemmy.world 77 points 2 years ago

Aaaannddd there it is… Certainly no conflicts of interest /s

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

The concept of a conflict of interest only matters if American voters care , and they don't.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago

Some might think this is corruption, but I assure you, this was the best offer we could find, because all the others got lost somehow?

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 years ago

Sounds like a real lack of efficiency

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 years ago

It's super efficient to lose the papers of all but one applicant. Really speeds up those decision times.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Nonono, Musk has already helped us with that. We are saving hundreds of dollars on wages, and only very few planes have crashed.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 58 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So

  • replace wires with satellite
  • which can fail or be slow
  • just so musk can shut it off at a whim

This is gonna be great, you guys.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago

I came here to say this. This doesn't look like replacing the air controller work, it's about the comm network. And it's making it dependent on fucking micro satellites, holy dumb shovel buckets.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah, it is in fact a terrible idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago

I hope Verizon sues Musk, Starlink, and the DOGE into oblivion. Even if they don’t have a chance of winning, they should be able to make it more difficult to do anything. Airlines should sue too due to the preventable crashes that occurred recently. In fact, I hope every company affected by DOGE’s policies sues.

They might not be able to get a fair trial, but they could potentially bog the system down in red tape.

Give ‘em Hell!

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Hoisted by their own petard, it seems. I'm with you. I hope they fight, but they also helped create this situation (like many corporations).

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/verizon-communications/summary?id=D000000079

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I don’t doubt it at all, but as the passage goes, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”. Or as I like to say: baby steps.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

Nah, the enemy of my enemy is the enemy of my enemy, nothing more, nothing less.

But as a great man once said, "Let them fight."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 2 years ago

Im in my 30s and often wonder, has the world always been this infuriating? Were we going apeshit watching representatives openly steal our future in 2005? 1995?

Were dudes in 1955 Paris tearing their hair our how the president's third cousin is getting a contract to rebuild the entire railway system on the merit of fuck all?

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

Yep. Never flying again.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

This is handing the button that controls your life over to elon... He had them strategically turn off Ukraine's internet at a critical moment to benefit putin... What do you think he's going to do when Jasmine Crockett's plane in on final approach to land back in her district after having the "fuck off, elon" press conference?

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 32 points 2 years ago

Oh, THERE it is. This is why Elump has allowed so many air traffic control issues recently. To set the stage for this bullshit.

Sorry, I’m kinda slow sometimes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

Musk is a walking ethics violation.

[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

I have no love for Verizon but using starlink is the definition of a conflict of interest. I mean so has everything else he's been doing but this one is especially egregious.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

An overhaul from the man who sells “full self driving”. What could possibly go wrong? 🙄

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

We call this a conflict of interest. Fuck Musk. Guess whose planes will never show up in flight logs so he, Trump, and all of Putin's other stooges can fly around and make deals with no bother.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 2 years ago

If the US does not accurately report flights, then the only solution is to cut it off from all international air travel. Any planes that would leave the US air space should be immediately forced to land or turn around by military aircraft in whichever airspace they enter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

Um, I'd like to choose whatever the fuck might be behind door number 3. Even if it's murder hornets. As long as they are the data transmission sort of murder hornets.

[-] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago

Creating problems to justify enriching themselves with private contracts... America, to the highest bidder

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I would sure love to see the proof that "FAA assessment is single digit months to catastrophic failure, putting air traveler safety at serious risk." from a wholly independent authority.

A note written on a paper napkin won't do.

[-] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

Totally no conflict of interest with Musk getting all these contracts while being in the current administration.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago

Time to start shorting US airline stocks

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

"This is your captain speaking. I'm afraid we're going to be a little bit delayed here because we've lost connection to the Starlink satellites that provide our communication. We'll be pushing back from the gate just as soon as the weather clears a bit."

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

“We’ll be cleared to land just as soon as our check clears.”

[-] shininghero@pawb.social 9 points 2 years ago

I think he's still salty over the ElonJet account that still posts the publicly available ADS-B flight plans for his plane on Bluesky and Mastodon.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

I'd say it's a good thing we have antitrust laws, but we all know how much laws mean to the group of mobsters currently in control.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

Man for a bunch of rich assholes the GoP sure likes to shoot themselves in the foot.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Hats off to the people that still care enough to document this corruption. Hopefully someday (while Musk is still alive) the general public will care enough as well, so that there will be consequences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I'm about to start demanding hazard pay from work when they need me to travel.

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago

Of course 🙄

[-] culprit@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Today thousands of planes lost critical communications while in the US airspace after a SpaceX test flight exploded in low earth orbit. The explosion destroyed a significant portion of the Starlink satellite constellation, and international space tracking organizations are monitoring the situation closely. They are reporting a Kessler Syndrome cascade has not been ruled out.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
473 points (99.0% liked)

News

39162 readers
3010 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS