158
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Attorney General Bondi released 200 Epstein documents (flight logs, redacted associates) while accusing FBI's NY office of withholding evidence. The disclosure exposed interagency conflicts with FBI Director Patel over transparency protocols, prioritizing procedural facades over substantive revelations.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago

The list:

~~Donald Trump~~

All the democrats, actually

[-] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 28 points 2 years ago

Pam Bondi has spent the last week erasing every important Republican she found, and probably penciling in major Democrats who were never on the list to begin with. We'll have no way of knowing, it's now a hit piece on Democrats, not an expose on pedophiles

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Then one of the ~5000 FBI agents assigned to J6 (and therefore counting down to having to find a new job) has an opportunity to do the something very funny.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io -2 points 2 years ago

That may well be, but do you have any sources for that? It reads a lot like a conspiracy theory based on nothing beyond Republicans generally being repugnant.

[-] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 years ago

A dutiful unveiling of shadows, yet the sun remains veiled—crumbs where a feast was promised.

😾😾😾

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

$100 says they purge any evidence linking to Trump.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 5 points 2 years ago

I'd be absolutely surprised if Barr didn't do this after they gave Epstein a way out of prison and testifying.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I would bet you ten thousand dollars that this happens. I could really use ten thousand dollars.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 years ago

Well, you know, Epstein committed suicide as well. 🙄 Truth is what you make of it.

[-] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

A bold wager, Xanthobilly—though purging evidence is the house's game, and the house always wins.

😺😺😾

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Won't happen. Way too much about Trump inside.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

Way too much of every political leader and American billionaires inside

I’m sure this won’t be heavily edited and selectively redacted in the most politically advantageous manner

/s

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

<>

She reminds me of Kayleigh MackaDoodle with the giant “hEalThcAre pLaN” binder full of empty pages.

Sure, Pam 👍🏼 We totally believe you.

<>

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
158 points (97.0% liked)

politics

31107 readers
2540 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS