this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
326 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5972 readers
644 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 87 points 3 days ago (2 children)

These people don’t understand that France and all these places have “fresh/safe food” (big generalization but let’s just take it as face value) because they have so many fucking regulations. Countries like that use their FDA-equivalents to heavily dictate what is and isn’t ok to feed people. RFK Jr. and his ilk have spread this bizarre, implicit and never outright stated lie that less regulation will lead to healthier and better food.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 40 points 3 days ago (2 children)

...spread this bizarre, implicit and never outright stated lie that less regulation will lead to healthier and better food

Wait. Are you telling me that the lack of regulation that allowed companies to put sawdust in food was a bad thing? Forcing them to sterilize food, report nutritional info, and use edible ingredients is good for consumers?

/s

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I was going to send the same thing lol

[–] DigitalDruid@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

our ~~FDA~~ federal oversight of the food industry was already captured by industry. Have you seen that they feed piglets other pigs shit instead of just giving them antibiotic shots because it's cheaper? We have no eggs because we are the stupid country that doesn't bother to innoculate chickens.

we aren't going from good to bad we are going from bad to worse.

[–] holdmabear@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The FDA has nothing to do with either of these topics.

Feeding a fecal slurry to inoculate piglets is practical and typically directed by a company veterinarian due to a viral disease. Judicious use of antibiotics is directed under a VFD by the FDA and would not be applicable in this case because in most cases viral diseases aren't treated by antibiotics.

Georgia, one of the top egg producing states in the US along with several other states were hit hard with avian influenza. The density of the US poltry industry (proximity of large farms in a small area) combined with migratory water fowl and a rapidly mutating virus is why we have no eggs. There is currently no effective avian influenza vaccine.

Please stop spreading misinformation.

[–] DigitalDruid@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you're defending feeding piglets shit.

i appreciate the correction on the agencies but you can fuck right off

[–] holdmabear@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

I think you misunderstand. I'm not defending anything. I am clarifying that its not just shoving pig feces at pigs for no reason or for cruelty. They are feeding fecal material to prevent mass mortalities from disease.

Its not unlike fecal transplants in humans. Are you angry at that as well?

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. I can't stand the whole vote with your dollars bullshit that the organic food people put out there. Fuck you. I want there to be rules and regulations saying you have to grow food without harmful pesticides. I don't want it to be a choice. I want my laundry detergent to be free of dyes and fragrances, and not harm the water supply. I don't want to have to pay extra for it. I want it to be the standard. The only way to get there is regulation.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The organic food people just use different pesticides. "Organic" is all a marketing scam.

[–] Plaidboy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is an oversimplification. It is true that organic farmers are permitted to use certain chemicals on their crops, but the allowed substances are very different in terms of ecological impact compared to conventional chemical treatments (conventional chemicals and their breakdown products generally persist in the environment much longer).

Organic farmers are also required to try to manage pests without chemicals first, steering the organic industry towards "integrated pest management" where very small amounts of pesticides are used in a highly targeted manner.

https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/blog/organic-101-allowed-and-prohibited-substances https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/ENTO/ENTO-384/ENTO-384.html

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't see anything backing up your alternative insect control claims, but it really is just a different batch of pesticides on wide use.

https://www.agdaily.com/technology/the-list-of-pesticides-approved-for-organic-production/

[–] Plaidboy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Here is an excerpt from another source summarizing the requirement for integrated pest management:

"These plans address three levels of pest management. Level A is based on the expectation that a well-designed and healthy organic system will naturally have fewer pest problems. It focuses on pest and disease outbreak prevention practices such as cover crops, crop rotation and providing habitat for ladybugs and other beneficial insects.

If Level A practices are not sufficient, Level B focuses on the introduction of insect predators and parasites, mulching, grazing, mowing, solarization and other mechanical and physical practices.

If additional pest management is needed, Level C includes the use of natural and synthetic pesticides on the National List."

https://www.safefruitsandveggies.com/organic-regulations/#%3A%7E%3Atext=Organic+farmers+are+required+to%2C-regulations%2Forganic%2Fhandbook.

Also, the list you have linked is so so much less bad than the list of allowed chemicals for conventional farmers, which I can't even find online... Best way I have found to view it is here: https://ordspub.epa.gov/ords/pesticides/f?p=CHEMICALSEARCH%3A46::::

Bottom line is that conventional pesticide use is much less transparent and less tightly regulated.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not always. Some of their food is just full of eggs/ larva that will erupt into an entire colony that takes over your whole damn kitchen!

Source: Stuck my dick in crazy.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well now you gotta go into detail. You can't leave us hanging

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I dated this chick that was way into holistic all natural whatever. I swear you could put anything in a cardboard box or other plain packaging with "organic" on the side and she should buy that shit and than post about it changing her life..

Anyway, she had some mixed nuts or some such completely unopened. Left that shit in my cupboard and I swear not even a week later my place was full of moths!

It took days to even figure out where they were all coming from. Just suddenly it was end of days in my house. She came back over at some point and was like wtf is going on with these bugs!?

I forget which one of us found it but dude, that container was jam packed with life. Like a whole ass ecosystem in there one by one squeezing it's way out through a tiny crack in the container! Fuckin Nasty!

With the source removed it still took a week or two for the place to be free of the damn things.

She sure could suck a dick tho!

[–] BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah that's a known problem with less treated food. For this kind of food (nuts, rice, granola, etc...) a good way to avoid the "packet bursting with life" situation is to keep it a few days in the freezer as soon as you get it.

It kills a good chunk of the pests.

[–] Pot8o@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And also keep it in a sealed container like a glass jar. That way bugs don't find a way IN through the crack in the packaging. I have to do both freezer and container with my flour otherwise I get bonus weevil protein in my cakes. The joys of living in warm humid climates! Edit: a word

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

10/10 you are hired

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Its almost like the regulations existed because the food was unhealthy. Not that the healthy food was just borne out of some struggle after regulations. The regulations are the cause. THE FUCKEN REGULATIONS ARE THE CAUSE.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hesitate to side with one anti science group over another. Why aren't real farmers doing the right thing?

Because you have to produce as much as possible if you are to compete with the corporate farms. This means for example maybe using the scary dangerous pesticide allowing the farm to get the greatest yield, they'd rather not, but the alternative is their farm goes under.

If things were regulated (and enforced), then corporate farms are disincentivised and farmers would produce safer food for consumption.