this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
212 points (99.5% liked)

News

38827 readers
2015 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

This is exactly what the minimum wage is supposed to prevent. The people that have taken that from us have made themselves rich at our expense.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Quick history lesson. In 1960 US minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the cost of the average US home was $11,000.00 A couple of high school kids could get married on graduation day and be homeowners in a few years.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

$10.86 and $119.463 in today's dollars. Currently the federal minimum wage is $7.25 or $0.67 an hour in 1960s dollars.

Assuming 2 weeks off a year this would be an annual income of $43,440 or 36% of the home's value, less than 3 years wages. In 2025, the median home value is $416,900 and a couple earning the federal minimum wage would earn $29,000 per year, which is 7% of the home's value or 14 years worth of wages.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People were buying houses that were smaller despite having larger household sizes then.

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/new-us-homes-today-are-1000-square-feet-larger-than-in-1973-and-living-space-per-person-has-nearly-doubled/

1000009199

More housing is where most of our increases in wealth have gone for the past century.

EDIT:

https://247wallst.com/special-report/2016/05/25/the-size-of-a-home-the-year-you-were-born/

This has size increase by decade.

In 1920, the average size of a new house in the US was 1,048 square feet, 248 square feet per person.

By 2015, the average size was 2,657 square feet. 1,046 square feet per person.

In the US, we have some of the largest houses in the world.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/house-size-by-country

The Europeans manage to get by with considerably smaller houses. You could fit nearly three average British homes


the British tend to be on the small side on housing


inside one average American home.

EDIT2: Elon Musk got on the whole "small house" fad thing a few years back. He lives in a $50k, 400 square foot box, and he's the richest guy in the world. So we definitely could get by with considerably smaller houses.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely no way that nazi fuck lives in that tiny house. And people don't get to choose what size houses are getting built, developers build homes by parameters outlined to maximize their profits. Then they slap the word 'Luxury'' in front of home and apartments to add a couple more thousand to the price. then some 'passive-income' touting fuck buys the house and uses some poor renters meager salary to pay off the mortgage.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is going to get drastically worse with no end in sight. There's very little reason our representatives should actually have to listen to these complaints. They have a blank US government check and they're going to use it to get richer.

Midterms? I really do hope we will be allowed to vote by then. The billionaire class has pretty much won. I'm wary of having hope with yesterday's protest. I want to hope. We'll see.

[–] DragonSidedD@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Guess what Trump's Tarriffs and trade war against literally every other country are only just getting started.

The stagflation is quite possibly upon us in a matter of weeks

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Do you consider changing the way you vote? Else you deserve that.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn't Trump supposed to fix that? Somebody call him.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

He'll get right on it, after infrastructure week.