this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
649 points (99.4% liked)

Curated Tumblr

7386 readers
4 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mouse -> Mice

Louse -> Lice

House -> Hice

[–] teft@piefed.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ox - oxen
box - boxen
equinox - equinoxen
xerox - xeroxen

[–] foofiepie@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Die - Dice
Pie - Pice
Tie - Tice
Lie - Lice

[–] teft@piefed.world 13 points 1 year ago

All these lice and misinformation....smh

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lice <- Louse
Tice <- Touse
Pice <- Pouse
Dice <- Douse

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

But also

die - dies

If we're talking about tools.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Check out this sweet moof!

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I checked out your ma's sweet moof last night 👉😏👉

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'll accept groof if it means we get moof and rooves.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Language is descriptive, so there’s nothing stopping you from using “rooves”, other than what typically results from using words others may not understand. Get enough people over long enough a timeline, and “rooves” becomes the norm, and “roofs” becomes archaic. Just gotta put in the effort.

[–] bran_buckler@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] don@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really, unless they're booving that groofy moof. Then, they're lost to us, in the land of boxen and meeses.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

That sounds exactly like the kind of thing a dirty groofer would say!

MODS BAN THIS ONE RIGHT NOW WON’T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dialectic morphology is a mofo.

eg. "w00t" is a word. 🤮

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Linguistics is a descriptive science.

Language though is not science, it's a cultural practice. Adhering to a specific set of rules to signal belonging to a specific cultural subgroup is perfectly normal; and deviation from those rules is not a socially neutral act. When and how you deviate signals a lot of things about you and what you're saying.

That's why slang is fascinating. It always tells a story. Whether it's English Prep School jargon that breached containment, whitewashed AAVL, group in-jokes, unconventional emojis, etc., a slang word says a lot about the person who uses it.

That is to say, if you unironically start saying "rooves", I can't say whether you'll start a trend that will ultimately change English forever (weirder things have happened). But I can assure you that the immediate effect will be that people will label you "tumblr weirdo". Which would be a correct assessment, so that's effective subtextual communication. Yay linguistics!

[–] ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I think I've been saying rooves my whole life. I don't think I'd generally write it that way, but it feels more natural to say.

If I have, I'm not sure anyone's noticed. My speech patterns are odd though, so it might not be terribly noticable. It's also possible I've never had to say the word. It's not common that you need to pluralize roof.

[–] Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

My personal one of these is just saying "I'll" as a response to questions like "Will you ...?" or "Who will ...?".

If it's a contraction of "I will", it should work, but somehow it sounds weird, like it disrupts the expected pattern of emphasis.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the English language is known for its rigid consistency of pluralization.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

This dude thinks that the singular of hooves is "hoove"

[–] EffortlessEffluvium@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago

I am Groof.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

rooves and roofs are both accepted as correct though? Roofs being the standard is a pretty new thing, and not the more common one everywhere

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 1 year ago

I haven't once seen 'rooves' used, let alone be considered as correct.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wiktionary says it changed in the 17th century, so depending on your definition of "new", sure. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/roofs

It doesn't sound weird to me personally, although it does look weird when written out.

It is how I was taught in the 80s, and I went to school in Europe, and the US. So, pretty recently it was quite common.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, but think about this: Groofy.

As soon as I typed that, I changed my mind. No longer defending groof.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago

One might say it sounds ... goofy.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're on the roof, they've found the groof

Vulfmon - Disco Snails (YT)

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You beat me to it. When I saw this post I wondered if this is where they got the word from lol

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Would most native speakers actually pronounce "rooves" differently from "roofs"? Is "grooves" already pronounced differently from a hypothetical "groofs"?

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 year ago

There is a difference, but it depends on accent. I don't think anyone would notice in speech if you switched though

I think there is a slight difference. Ooves is slightly longer and softer sounding than oofs.

[–] teft@piefed.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

f is the voiceless labiodental fricative and v is the voiced labiodental fricative.

Basically for roofs your vocal cords don't vibrate on the final f sound. For rooves your vocal cords vibrate on the final v sound.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I know the difference between f and v, the question is whether it makes a difference in this specific case and if yes, whether most native English speakers actually know that. I'm not a native English speaker and words that end in -ooves aren't that common (when is the last time you said "grooves" or "hooves"?).

English is famously inconsistent about how written letters are pronounced, and there are a lot of accents.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Right now? Any if this vocalized in public puts you at some risk of deportation, NGL.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] m_xy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

milf - milves

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We are groof.

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

I propose we use roofies! It sounds cute and probably isn't taken already.

[–] skrrtly_ambrose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the plural of roof should be roof. fite me

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having Regular English would be nice given some of the silly stuff English has.

Like, really, what's the root of "worse, worst" and "better, best"? "Wo" and "Be"????

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wyrs- and bat- making their way through PIE, Proto-Germanic, and sometimes Dutch.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

B-but that's even more irregular!

load more comments
view more: next ›