247
submitted 11 months ago by GFGJewbacca@midwest.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Google’s YouTube has agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle a lawsuit by President Donald Trump over his 2021 account suspension following the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

According to documents filed in federal court in California, $22 million of the settlement will be contributed to the Trust for the National Mall to help pay for the construction of the White House State Ballroom. The rest will go to other plaintiffs, including the American Conservative Union.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 173 points 11 months ago

$22 million of the settlement will be contributed to the Trust for the National Mall to help pay for the construction of the White House State Ballroom.

I hate everything so fucking much right now. I'm just so fucking tired of it being so god damned stupid and shitty day after day.

[-] TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world 66 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Same, it's pretty maddening. I want to stop hearing about stuff that's going to deteriorate my general health but at the same time I don't want to be blindsided by all the stuff that will have a legitimate impact on my life.

It's all so insanely stupid and I'm so tired of him getting away with all the bullshit without even trying. Feels like the whole government is just his condom puppets that say yes to his every whim and just allow him to fuck over the country

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 11 months ago

Not even just the government. These are basically payoffs from companies like Google to curry favor.

I'm so sick of these companies that sold themselves as making the world a better place for two fucking decades immediately just turning tail and deciding actually just paying off the king for better treatment positioning is better than democracy. It's all so short sighted and absolutely fuck-stupid.

[-] 100@fedia.io 11 points 11 months ago

start collecting names of people doing this and deal with them after this regime is gone

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Or before it's gone, less judicially.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 11 months ago

What, did you expect MBAs to be smart?

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago

I mean, fair, but we're talking about Alphabet/Google/Youtube which was founded and run by two computer scientists until very recently. To my knowledge both Sergei Brin and Larry Page continue to be controlling shareholders, and while Page stepped down in 2019, Brin came back in 2023 to contribute to Google's AI efforts.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 11 months ago

Just because they vote on some stuff once a year doesn't mean they control the company.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I guess my point is Google was shit long before this when those guys still ran the company. Hell, even Eric Schmidt was a former computer engineer.

Brin was even at Trump's inauguration along with current CEO Sundar Pinchai.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 11 months ago
[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago

If you want to feel worse, even if that whole $22 million went to funding the construction of a ballroom, thats barely only 10% of the 'cost.'

[-] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 11 months ago

I don’t want to be on this stupid fucking planet anymore

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 18 points 11 months ago

I like this planet, I want them off it.

[-] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 81 points 11 months ago

It's a way to secure bribes for the president. He files frivolous lawsuits and then shakes them down for settlements.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 40 points 11 months ago

Even tech oligarchs allied to the regime do this, as we see here. It's not just the shakedown, it's also just a much easier way to pay him. Easier to explain than briefcases of cash or the very obvious money laundering that he tries to pretend is a real estate business.

[-] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Yup Google is about to be handed a DoD or DOJ contract for cloud.

[-] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 47 points 11 months ago

Fucking Americans are so fucking stupid, just watching their country devolve into a fascist crime mob run by fucking clowns, sponsored by their favourite companies.

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Beyond protesting i don't know of much else i can do here.

[-] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

It's called civil DISOBEDIENCE. NOT protesting. BE DISOBEDIENT. Just do it CIVILY. It's always worked when ENOUGH people DISOBEY. NOT when they protest.

Protesting doesn't do much but make Billionaires laugh at the fact they convinced you history is full of successful protests. It's not. It's full of successful civil Disobedience.

It's just more dangerous than ever to do. But also worth it more than ever.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Protests behind police lines are just state sponsored venting sessions.

What does effective civil disobedience look like for the average worker?

Workplace resistance: Refusing to follow company policies that exploit workers or endanger others. For example, dock workers refuse working on ships carrying arms, warehouse workers slowing down production, or service workers collectively refusing to enforce discriminatory rules.

Withholding labor: Strikes are the most visible form, but even small coordinated actions like doing only what is contractually required, nothing extra, can be civil disobedience.

Supporting boycotts: Refusing to consume or sell products linked to oppression.

Community-based defiance: Helping neighbors resist evictions, sharing food outside of state regulated channels, or organizing mutual aid despite restrictions.

Symbolic defiance: Wearing or displaying political symbols at work or in public even when banned, as a way to disrupt the normalization of injustice.

Disrupt “business as usual". Don't let them use your labor to exploit others and ruin your future for their profits. Land another job offer and threaten to resign if oppressive decisions aren't reversed, and follow threw when they call your bluff.

Your labor is there lifeline, don't forget that.

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I think your point to boycotting makes sense every other point only applies if I work for one of those major companies, I dont, my company respects the labor they have and provides us great compensation and stability, definitely not the norm within my the sector. So sure I'll be stopping using Google services as much but I can't withhold their labor and anything I do at my workplace will have zero effect on those companies.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I mean I'll be switching away from google services. Boycotts and strikes are the last remaining peaceful solutions

[-] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 25 points 11 months ago
[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

How in the hell can anyone successfully sue over an account on a video sharing site? Brick and mortar stores have the right to refuse service, why not online services? Or does Google just want a way to give Donald John Trump money without it looking as obvious?

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Its about bribing them to keep contracts etc

[-] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 16 points 11 months ago

What's a backbone?

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Hope you're all ready to live the rest of your lives in a pseudo-Russia.

We're well on our way. Probably too far to stop it, to be honest.

Shit country. Shit populace.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Unfortunately, I think we're already there. They moved very quickly.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

I wish I still used Google products so I could stop using them now

[-] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 11 months ago

Open corruption and bribes is the name of the game for republicans and their tiny orange leader.

[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago
[-] doctortofu@piefed.social 7 points 11 months ago

Can you bend the knee so hard it breaks? Because that's what all those companies are doing...

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

If you're already using ublock to skip their ads, does boycotting YouTube help? Genuine question, on the one hand you're giving them metrics but on the other, you're using their resources without really giving them anything.

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

Boycotting helps but it has to be done on scale which almost never happens because people are spoiled and lazy. There has to be a huge momentum.

[-] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

For me sadly all of the creators are there and i am hoping some of them jump to peertube or something

[-] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 3 points 11 months ago
[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago
[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

I maintain that american corporations should be beholden to the bill of rights. A random citizen can choose to ban people from their forum, but an "open forum" where they are exploiting their users, shouldn't have that luxury.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

If it's an "open forum" or "the public square" as it's also been called, it should be owned and regulated by the government, not controlled by a for-profit corporation.

Either way, what you're suggesting is forcing corporations to provide a platform for fascism. That goes WAY beyond free speech protection and into compelling services/prohibiting moderation.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
247 points (97.3% liked)

News

39003 readers
2174 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS