this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
130 points (97.8% liked)

Games

50188 readers
2020 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] missingno@fedia.io 181 points 9 months ago (9 children)

I want shorter games with worse graphics made by people who are paid more to work less and I'm not kidding.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 74 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Generally games where people had fun making them feel better to play.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

Yeah, for me it's not even just the creative freedom, but an actual fuzzy feeling that me and the devs are having fun together. Open-source games also hold a special place in my heart for that reason, no matter how scrungy they are.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But most importantly, more fun!

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I might be showing my age, but my interpretation of "a better game" was right away "a more fun game", which got followed up with the thought: Did it make them more fun?

I feel like we had fun figured out pretty well in the last century already. And in many ways, the higher specs are used to add realism and storytelling, which I know many people enjoy in their own way, but they're often at odds with fun, or at least sit between the fun parts of a game.

Like, man, I watched a video of the newest Pokémon game and they played for more than an hour before the tutorial + plot exposition was over. Practically no fun occurred in that first hour.
Just imagine putting coins into an arcade cabinet and the first hour is an utter waste of time. You'd ask for your money back.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Have you heard of stardew valley? Made by one guy, 16 bit sprite pixelart, although he does still work his ass off.

Two outta three ain't bad, right?

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

TBF, the dude has made millions off the game, and he doesn't make the updates paid dlc. He just keeps adding to SDV because he loves it

[–] SilverCode@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I would love to buy a game at a reasonable price that I actually have a chance of finishing in a weekend, or maybe one marathon session. A game with a great story and good gameplay that isn't drawn out over 30 hours.

As for graphics, I'm quite happy if they drop all the shiny new bullshit that you have to watch a Digital Foundry video on just to even know it exists in the game, and rather focus on a good art style.

And it goes without saying, pay the people who make the games more, and the mega corp CEO's less.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Shinobi: Art of vengeance. It is a 2D brawler with stages that end with a boss, but they have metroidvania elements to add value for replaying them. It is about 10 hours to go start to finish while doing a lot of the back tracking stuff. Simple story but incredible combat and good level design(only one level I thought was a bit meh), the art and animations are fantastic as well. Very much a new take on the old games, and has a demo to try as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Hey come play Bannerlord sometime!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I meant, they’ve been teaching gamers that better graphics is the reason to get a new console for over 30 years. Good luck now trying to unteach that.

[–] killerscene@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

they just need to keep the same graphics and improve optimization and stop relying on dlss and frame gen.

that shit works well, but id be really impressed to just play a game that looks great and throw on ray tracing and still dont need to use dlss to get above 100 fps.

[–] Dhs92@piefed.social 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It works but it introduces some awful artifacting

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

It can't be worse than whatever the fuck UE5 does by default

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

I tried making that point on reddit. You wouldn't believe the amount of down arrows that came at me.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So many folks online seem to be upset that there are very few games are exclusive to only the latest consoles. They want “next gen” games but fail to realize that the product they want would not have a large enough market for the development costs.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They got tricked into buying a console because of the exclusives. Now that those are becoming less common, they can't accept this truth.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

Nintendo still makes plenty of exclusives. They’re not yet obsessed with live service games. Sony and Microsoft have wasted insane amounts of time developing trash that will never see the light of day.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 41 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If game performance is what makes games better then consoles will never reach the heights of PCs.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right? Consoles used to exist because specialized equipment would perform better than general consumer electronics. That hasn't really been true for a long time now.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

That's not exactly accurate, it's ignoring significantly that hardware in consoles is mostly static. The consistency and limitations on hardware undoubtedly is an important part of that equation

[–] markz@suppo.fi 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It says there that graphics performance doesn't matter that much.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If it's not graphics what is the PS5 doing that makes the games better on a PS5 if not performance?

[–] markz@suppo.fi 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"I think PS5 and SSD has made almost every game a better game," he concludes.

You could read the article too

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 9 months ago

Right, so performance over graphics.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Im guessing speed. To me, one of my favorite improvements over the ps4 was load speeds of everything. It felt like I went back in time to SNES days when walking into the next room was instant, unlike on the ps1 for the same games.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago

Another word for less loading time could be performance right?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Everyone's different, and you can get used to a lot.

So some people might not be able to tell 90fps from 120fps, but I definitely notice. But if I played something at 90 for long enough, I'd get used to it and stop noticing how much worse it was from 120 fps.

I will say they don't get near enough credit for not only adaptive triggers, but them working on damn near any game that appears on PlayStation even while on PC.

I bought a ps5 just for those triggers, and gave it away (but kept a controller) once it worked on PC.

That's the direction Playstation needs to go. If they made a new controller with Hall Effect sticks and 4 back buttons they'd absolutely clean up. They came so close with the edge, but didn't give a back button for half the face buttons. And went "replaceable" sticks that will eventually break instead of Hall Effect.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I can't tell the diff in FPS performance. I wish I could.

When I got my PS5 and played some games I was like, wow the future is here! Turns out I was playing PS4 games. Also I turned on and off ray-tracing for SpiderMan and couldn't tell either.

[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why would you wish to be highly sensitive to an increase/decrease in fps.

That’s just a curse and you should be happy you don’t have it.

You can just enjoy more games with a cheaper pc/console.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I solve this by turning off my FPS counter, so I can no longer tell :)

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

lol, just to fit in with everyone 😂

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Awesome take, all of it. 100% agree. I don't own a PlayStation console, never have, but you make perfect sense.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't surprise to hear this. If Nvidia was really holding back, then AMD would have past them. I feel like they are starting to experience what the cpu side started seeing when they hit 4ghz and had to start chipping away at more clocks. It took longer as they are doing easily parallel operations, but it was bound to happen. I really wonder how both AMD and Nvidia will compare to their prior architectures next iteration. Will my 4080 still be faster than a 6070(ti)?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Moore's Law was originally formulated as the cost per integrated component being cut in half every x months. The value of x was tweaked over the decades, but settled at 24.

That version of the law is completely dead. Density is still going up, but you pay more for it. You're not going to build a console anymore for the same cost while increasing performance.

High end PC's can still go up, but only by spending more money. This is why the only substantial performance gains the last few GPU generations has been through big jumps in cost.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

Important to note, the current chip fabrication process of 5nm is very close to limits imposed by the laws of physics. Unless a wholly different chip making process is invented that can go even smaller, we might be looking at the actual limit of the tech.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 9 months ago
[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I think it’s finally time to upgrade my 2013 gaming PC that still runs games decently well

[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People are criticizing Playstation, but I’m still really happy to have a Playstation 5 alongside my Steam Deck.

As much as I love playing old games on the deck and it has now become my main console, I’m happy to have my Playstation 5 for demanding games (mostly sim racing) and to watch blurays.

Having a powerful PC would not bring me the versatility my Steam Deck/Playstation 5/Surface Go 1 is giving me for now.

Although that might change if the Playstation 6 comes without blurays.

I don’t understand why some PC people feel the need to say consoles are useless, when it’s only to them that they would be.

[–] WALLACE@feddit.uk 3 points 9 months ago

I have a PC and PS5. I like my PS5 because I know when I buy a game for it, it's going to work. On the other hand with my PC I have to triple check the specs and fiddle around with the graphics settings, and the only way I can have confidence that it will play any game is if I spend ~£1000 upgrading it. Or just get the game on the playstation.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Is this where we're at?

It sounds like they don't want another game to be made and we will just recycle the same classics in the current era's standard of HD forever.

People don't buy games to try out their new consoles, they buy consoles to play games

load more comments
view more: next ›