532
submitted 10 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] redlemace@lemmy.world 181 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] Thorry@feddit.org 178 points 10 months ago

Millennials out here preparing for their 5th once in a lifetime market crash.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 29 points 10 months ago

I went through the oil embargo 70s, a couple of Reagan recessions, a Bush I recession, all before 2000, when Republicans really got their nation-destroying chops together for some proper, world class economic irresponsibility.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

Those weren’t on the scale of the housing and Covid crashes. Dot con was pretty bad, but still nothing like 2007/8

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 14 points 10 months ago

The 70s was really terrible, and lasted nearly an entire decade, but yeah, everything between that and 2008 was secondary.

Still, it demonstrates that the economy is usually at its worst under Republicans, and disastrous under MAGAs.

They have the self-described reputation as economically responsible, but in reality, they always screw up the economy. Carter, Clinton, Obama, and Biden all entered office with an active Republican economic downturn of their own making, and we're forced to clean up the Republican mess before they could get their own agenda underway.

Biden not only had an economic recovery to navigate, he also had to launch an emergency Covid vaccination program, and he accomplished both ahead of schedule. If he had dealt with the severe national security threat of MAGA, and crushed them, and kept them out of office under the 14th Amendment, he'd be one of the Top 10 presidents of all time. Instead, his Covid/Economic successes will be forgotten, and he'll be in the bottom 15.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 24 points 10 months ago

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] paperazzi@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Sixth for GenXers. So tired of this shit.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I’m an Oregon Trailer, are you counting the savings and loan crash, or am I missing one in the 90s?

  • savings & loan
  • dot com
  • 9/11
  • housing bubble
  • Covid
  • AI
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I'm just waiting for cheap 60xx series gpus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Let's see 2000, 2008, 2020, what am I missing?

[-] Alienmonkey@mander.xyz 7 points 10 months ago

History rhymes so 202...

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] alexc@lemmy.world 153 points 10 months ago

Holy shit. That’s almost one Elon Musk’s Salary dollars

[-] Pavidus@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

That's more or less how I deal with any economic numbers these days. Just one mans salary. No big deal.

[-] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 8 points 10 months ago

He eventually buys up all ai companies for nickels on the megadollar and copy strikes all unauthorized ai providers.

The only resistance left is the decentralised group of people running outdated and decensored LLM's for erotic RPG.

We're doomed

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 90 points 10 months ago

If only the AI could have given them a heads up.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

Just as accurate as tarot cards...

[-] Hackworth@piefed.ca 42 points 10 months ago
[-] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sorry, you want the Tower here.

It’s one of my favorite cards for symbolism, because the story is so apparent on the card. People jumping out of a burning building to their peril.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 82 points 10 months ago

It always amazes me just how stupid all these billionaires actually are. It just highlights the fact that they did not actually "earn" that wealth, in the first place. If it were truly a matter of talent and skill, they wouldn't be crashing the economy every five to ten years...but here we are, for the fifth(?) time in the last few decades?

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago

You may think it's stupid but these people are still going to make ass loads of money out of this entire ordeal. Because the entire system is rigged in their favor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 50 points 10 months ago

Crashing the economy is only stupid if you don't have enough liquidity to capitalize on it. That or if you actually give a shit about people.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago

The crashes are deliberate. It allows them to scoop up infrastructure for pennies on the dollar. It's not a coincidence that the largest ever upward transfer of wealth occurred during COVID. That was the elite consolidating their holdings. And evidently, they're not exactly satisfied yet and want even more.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

They aren't stupid, they are gambling and they toss their weight to stack the bet in their favor long enough so that they can cash out and not be left with the bag when it crashes.

Every recession, richs get richer and we get poorer.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 10 months ago

POP THAT BUBBLE
POP THAT BUBBLE
POP THAT BUBBLE

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 10 months ago
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

The most obvious global collapse of a stock

[-] Cybersec@piefed.social 30 points 10 months ago
[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

When I lose hundreds for billions of dollars, I have to go to bed without supper.

[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 23 points 10 months ago

Finally ... move on to something else.

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Honestly, I gotta hand it to Apple. They never jumped on the hype train for AI as bad as all these other companies because they were smart enough to realize it was temporary and they are just chillin' right now. Sure they did a few things here and there, but they didn't try and change their entire business model around AI. When this bubble does pop, I'm sure Apple will be the one on top again.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Apple has invested heavily in infrastructure that will make every iPhone and app on the store transparent to an AI running on bespoke silicone designed for the task. Much like Windows, Apple foresees a future where AI is a substitute for the GUI.

https://www.archyde.com/apples-ai-integration-a-deep-dive-into-iphones-future/

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] scytale@piefed.zip 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think it was unintentional. They didn’t hop on in time and were left behind. Then they tried rushing and put out a half baked AI product. And now they’re using Gemini for their AI because they can’t catch up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 8 points 10 months ago

Apple is always a decade behind, though. It isn’t an innovator anymore.

[-] thr0000witaway@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 10 months ago

was it a clever tactical ploy to avoid the AI hype train? Or was it that Apple’s culture just can’t pivot fast enough to successfully operationalise new/emerging technologies?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] uss_entrepreneur@startrek.website 18 points 10 months ago
[-] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 10 months ago

From the article:

Nvidia declined 7%, Oracle, and AMD dropped 8.8%, Meta and Microsoft dropped around 4%.

These are amounts that stocks often fluctuate. Percentages are what matter. Phrasing it as a big dollar value was lost is always manipulative framing.

The market is big. There are more than a few shares. A small change becomes a big number when multiplied by the size of the entire market. $800 billion is basically meaningless.

The numbers are fake anyway. Market cap is the value if all existing shares were sold at the current price. Nonsense. Selling all the shares would change the price in some way.

[-] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Never have I seen greater evidence that the ultra-wealthy are fundamentally catastrophic for the economy.

Aside from the last like 100 billion pieces of evidence that came before this well predicted one.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 15 points 10 months ago

... and that's just the warmup act!

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

Oh Let it burn, let it burn, let it burn, oh won't you let it burn, oh won't you won't you let it burn, oh let it buuuuurn oh won't you let it burn, oh won't you let it buuurn! 🎵

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

Whew finally

[-] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago
[-] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

You mean the big short guy will earn money? Interesting. Hopefully that means I also happen to earn money as well.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
532 points (98.9% liked)

News

39190 readers
3101 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS