747
Why is our government so dedicated to protecting elite criminals and their treatment?
Because our government is run by elite criminals, obviously.
Well nothing about them is elite. They are just criminals.
I suppose it would be more accurate to say "because the wealthy have class solidarity."
Fucking hell, if those criminals are the elite of their kind, I dread to think what the shitty, incompetent criminals are like.
Apparently they're like a president.
One of them ran a thing called "Douche" or something at the beginning of the year
Because our government is predominantly made up of elite criminals who have just not been caught yet. It's just professional courtesy, really.
Because they're in solidarity with their own class interests. No doubt that there are a bunch of elected officials who would feature in the Epstein files if they were released in full, but even those that wouldn't still have a vested interest in stabilising the current order. Doing this sets a precedent that even if consequences come for some, they will be protected.
Not every elected representative is a corrupt asshole, but I'd wager it's the majority. Some of them probably even think they're acting benevolent in acting to reinforce and protect their own power.
The system isn't broken, it's working exactly as intended.
Because they're friends
Because they defer to power.
Self interest.
I would argue that it's important to protect any criminal's treatment while imprisoned..... however, this is especially hypocritical for them considering how they normally regard 99% of the people in prison.
Maybe they’re the only ones they can actually empathize with because they can see themselves in an elite prison someday.
~~Why is~~ our government so dedicated to protecting ~~elite~~ their criminals and their treatment.
The question is the answer.
Facilitate sex trafficking: preferential treatment
report (leak) wrongdoing: lose job
Lol.... wtf kind of society is this??
This is the bad place
It's what happens when the rich have nothing to fear from the government
A local reporter tried to discuss more with the whistleblower and got a little more
Man she sounds like she gives no fucks. Good on her!
Her answer about security at the end is just perfect
Amazing that in the AI drone future dogs are still one of the best security systems. I do wonder if we could train birds to take down quad copters and drones
I have the absolute most respect for any whistleblower. I dread to imagine what kind of world we'd be in w/o them. Example, Snowden.
Unless they're planning on killing her this seems like its just as bad for PR as straight up pardoning her.
They're going to say she was mauled to death by the vicious dogs (puppies)
They've also been transferring prisoners to maximum security prisons who leak information about her treatment.
Gross
We should start go fundmeing whistleblowers.
Get that staff on the news and have them do rounds.
What the fuck.
Pedos helping pedos.
Thank goodness and jolly good too. Heaven forbid that anyone dares to look at the internal processes in place at a (checks nodes) prison.
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
747 points (99.2% liked)
News
39630 readers
1943 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS