this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
376 points (97.7% liked)

Flippanarchy

2704 readers
259 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 79 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And a lot of the jobs that are truly awful and nobody wants to do ... are bullshit jobs that don't actually need to be done in the first place.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 64 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"no one wants to flip burgers for 7.25!" No shit buddy, maybe your business shouldn't exist anymore

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

We could automate those jobs, yes, but then a lot of people would have no jobs at all.

[–] Celediel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In a society in which one's material needs are not tied to one's labour, this would not be a problem.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

True, but we don't have that society, yet we do have the ability to automate a lot of people out of a job.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 months ago

Nah, we need to ban jobs and force automation on everything

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 6 months ago

I see several. Most notably that we seem to keep winding up with leaders that want to enrich themselves rather than make thing better for everyone.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 15 points 6 months ago

If we were providing basic needs to everyone, then it would not matter. Its so disgusting how many think "work" is the end all be all to existence.

And that is not saying people are lazy, but that they should not define their existence doing tasks for other people's benefit for the right to simply be.

And there would be jobs that need a person, but we as a society could and should be able to handle that. Some sort of "everyone does some sort of work age 25-30, when they are kind of "peak ability.". Or "You get a bit more if you want to work, but its not necesary.

That sort of thing.

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 49 points 6 months ago

"nobody wants to do this" = "I don't want to do this and I have no imagination"

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 19 points 6 months ago

Props to the original poster for being open-minded in their reaction

But treating people like people with needs and desires as well as dreams doesn't raise the bottom line! Cries in capitalism /s

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Theres a steep irony in someone doing government controlled work idealizing a system where the work they do would likely not exist. Who exactly would be mandating/funding the existence, operation, or regular testing of a sewage plant in an anarchist society?

Society is poorly designed in the general sense, sure. It could be vastly improved and people could have more liberty wrt a lot of things. But left to their own devices people on average would not choose to mandate water treatment. Even if they somehow did, providing no central system of oversight for making sure that it happens would all but guarantee it doesnt get accomplished.

Its ridiculous how many people take critical aspects of society for granted and assume they would continue to exist in a world where everyone does whatever the fuck they want without any central planning or control. In many places around the world people already dont have access to fresh/clean water for this exact reason…

Look at the libertarian experiments that have all failed spectacularly, like Grafton, NH. Mfs couldnt even agree to not feed the bears or dispose of their trash appropriately. And that doesnt require some massive infrastructure project to accomplish. The greater good often necessitates protecting people at large from their own stupidity, otherwise your liberties are quickly diminished by your neighbor’s negligence

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 14 points 6 months ago

Its ridiculous how many people take critical aspects of society for granted and assume they would continue to exist in a world where everyone does whatever the fuck they want without any central planning or control. In many places around the world people already dont have access to fresh/clean water for this exact reason…

You have a very simplistic view of what an anarchist society could look like and it's rooted in the assumption that the only possible alternative to central planning is no planning. It's absolutely possible for people to organize access to clean water in a decentralized manner and I know this because it has been done repeatedly all over the world and throughout human history. In the places you're thinking of that do not have access to clean water it is often not the result of a lack of central planning, but directly caused by it, such as when a multinational corporation claims a community's water supply as its private property and restricts access.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Precisely. The original post shows there could still be labor willing to do the work, but it does does not address how that work would be funded. Even if the labor was free there are resources required to build and maintain that plant that are not free. Where do those resources come from?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Wait till you hear about the anarchist that loves going into the mines with toxic gases and all to get the resources for the sewage maintainer guy.

[–] ZomieChicken@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (16 children)

Let's see; keep things running by going into a mine and digging out something that is needed with the proper safety gear, or going into a mine and digging out something with only the safety gear your boss couldn't convince the the government to not require.

Such hard choices...

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If it's necessary, someone will do it. If that can't be counted on, we're kinda fucked.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Will you? Because I know I won't

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If all that stands between me and the beginning of a society with no oppression is strapping some gear on and doing some manual labor, then fuck it gimme a pickaxe I'm going down there.

Am I suited for it? Absolutely the fuck not, but I'm willing, and I'm sure many others are as well, especially if they know that whatever happens, their safety and health comes before profit, and they'll always come back to a good place. I could certainly stand working until things begin to hurt if I knew every bit I dug up would do good.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (16 children)

Yeah that's cool. You and sewage guy will make a great duo. But the 5 dudes over there organized themselves, acquired a weapon and killed the other guy. They're waiting for you to come out of the mine with all those resources and you don't even know it.

Is that freedom from oppression?

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sobchak@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

If you consider the Zapatista's anarchist, they are a federation of autonomous municipalities that do stuff like this (along with hospitals, schools, etc).

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is why I'm moving away from programming for a boss and am looking for jobs where I don't get the stress of countless meetings and project manager bullshit. I just want a nice job where I don't feel too much stress and make enough money to live decently. Then I can continue working on opensource projects as my hobby.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I really dislike all the "ceremonies" that seem to be involved in software development now. It's just so much useless ritual.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

"We can discuss it at the stand-up".

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)
[–] ZomieChicken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago

If jobs end up not being done, it's because they have been deemed not necessary by the people. There are enough weird people to fill just about every niche, if filling that niche also allows them to live.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 7 points 6 months ago

There is no job that someone somewhere doesn't want to do.

load more comments
view more: next ›