25
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] schwim@piefed.zip 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Title:

There are no psychopaths, but the idea persists.

Article:

Psychopathy may not exist at all.

[-] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 6 months ago

Laughed more at Rasmus’s “gaslight idea

[-] Senal@programming.dev 14 points 6 months ago

The DSM doesn't include that specific diagnosis any more right, it's all the ASPD and DPD spectrum now ?

They removed it because of the absolute shitshow that was trying to reliably diagnose psychopathy as it was originally described.(and possibly the negative connotations associated with the word itself)

So now they have a series of metrics to measure things they can somewhat reliably measure over time.

Like how the medical diagnosis of idiot doesn't exist anymore, but there are more accurate and nuanced terms and diagnosis for intellectual disabilities in various forms.

I could be wrong however, my understanding of this area of research is middling at best.

[-] janonymous@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

There are no idiots, but the idea persists

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Pyschopaty never existed as a diagnostic.

It's akin to a doctor diagnosing you with "sick". It is nonspecific, arbitrary and useless to inform treatment or prognosis. It was used as a descriptor by very early psychiatry, but it was never a distinct diagnosis.

[-] lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago

We just think there are because so many people act like psychopaths

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I thought we had long decided that a psychopath was a sociopath with extra steps.

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 5 points 6 months ago

As with most things like this it's probably a spectrum rather than something you either are or are not. It's easy to tell when someone is in the far end of that spectrum but the line where it officially crosses into psychopathy is always going to be arbitrary.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It is a laymans term for someone without a conscience whose actions usually result in hurting people.

It describes a wild range of behavior from something like your ex acting like a "psychopath" to a murderer. For this reason it isn't useful in a legal or medical sense.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago

There are no psychopaths, only Zuul

[-] dbtng@eviltoast.org 1 points 6 months ago

That was ... mildly interesting.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
25 points (83.8% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27899 readers
357 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS