115

Android Sideloading: New Rules, Advanced Flow & What Users Need to Know (2026) - World Today Journal (www.world-today-journal.com)

submitted 5 months ago by Itwasntme223@discuss.online to c/technology@lemmy.world

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As announced a couple of weeks ago, power users always have an option to enable sideloading of unregistered APK files through an advanced flow that requires an authentication step to confirm they are taking this step of their own volition and a one-off, 24-hour waiting period to deter scammers.

Sure. That's the reason why they're introducing a 24-hour delay. Not because they want to make it miserable so people stop side loading.

all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] Maerman@lemmy.world 116 points 5 months ago

Man, I hate the term 'sideloading'. It's just installing an app, for fuck's sake.

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago

I just sideloaded a applications on windows using a .exe and running through the installation wizard. Microsoft must hate me for not using the Windows Store /s

[-] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 42 points 5 months ago

Microsoft must hate me for not using the Windows Store /s

Well actually...

[-] IratePirate@feddit.org 8 points 5 months ago

No /s required. Knowing Microslop, this is only a matter of ~~time~~ enshittification.

[-] Bitflip@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 months ago

We just have to normalize something worse sounding for installing apps from the play store. "I can't believe you sloploaded Signal after I told you about Molly!"

[-] Willdrick@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Slop is overused, how about slaveloaded, sheeploaded

Better yet: "how can you live like that?"

[-] einlander@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

People forget that it's called sideloading because, in the beginning, most android apps were sold without the ability to install 3rd party apks. You had to use adb to sideload the apk to the phone.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

adb sideload is for installing an OS or OS update. The command to install an app is adb install.

[-] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Uh oh, someone tell the Android devs that is isn't Newthink compliant.

[-] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 5 months ago

They weren't discussing the command they were discussing the action.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Hmmm. Where does the action name come from 🤔

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 months ago

Wat

[+] artyom@piefed.social -15 points 5 months ago

It's distinctly different from just installing an app.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

It's distinctly different from just installing an app *via the play store

But is otherwise just installing an app.

Do I "sideload" Steam on windows too if I don't go through the microsoft store?

[-] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I mean, at the going rate of online freedom... Give it a month

[-] artyom@piefed.social -4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

But is otherwise just installing an app.

Yes, other than being different.

Do I "sideload" Steam on windows too if I don't go through the microsoft store?

No because there's no functional difference.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Please do elaborate on this functional difference the play store has and the microsoft version doesn't. I'm a little lost here.

I can use my F-Droid apps just as well as their play store counterparts.

[+] artyom@piefed.social -6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Check out the OP, lots of good info there about the differences.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I remain as lost as I was.

The only differences I noticed are the ones google is forcing through with their new "advanced flow", but that does not constitute a "functional difference".

[-] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 5 months ago

LOL you are grasping at straws so hard and I don't know why. Of course it's functionally different. I don't know how you could possibly assemble an argument otherwise.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

For something so apparently obvious you sure seem reluctant to put it to text.

Thus far I have given you the benefit of doubt, but you have yet to come with a real argument.

I cannot, nor will I argue against what I have to imagine your opinion to be. Either say what you mean or say nothing at all. Until then your point is moot.

[-] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's already in the text in the OP. If you can't read it or refuse to acknowledge it, me rewriting it is not going to help you.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Clearly we are reading different articles in that case, or I must've really missed the bit you're so staunchly referring to.
Or maybe you can, I dunno, quote whatever bit of text you're so staunchly referring to?

[-] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

citation?

A single example is fine, i can't find any, but perhaps i'm missing something important.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 months ago

The citation is in the OP and also the comment you just replied to. Literally the entire OP article is about the differences. You can't possibly read it and not see them.

[-] fluxx@mander.xyz 4 points 5 months ago

How so?

[+] artyom@piefed.social -9 points 5 months ago

Check out the article in OP.

[-] PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBIES@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I checked and it doesn't answer the question.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 5 months ago

Its literally the topic of the entire article, from beginning to end. You can't possibly have read it and still not understand this.

[-] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

It isn't and this is the one of many replies in which you haven't provided even a single example.

This is because you can't provide something that doesn't exist.

Even if your reading comprehension was at such a level as to genuinely think there was an example of what you are saying in that text, you'd provide it.

I can't see a scenario where you aren't trolling for engagement.

I expect some personal attacks, continued feigned ignorance, perhaps some bargain basement deflection , all very standard and boring and that's OK, if that's your skill ceiling i won't hold it against you.

But.. i'm willing to be surprised if you have something novel, perhaps some obscure fallacy I’ll have to look up, something that sets you apart from the basement dweller trolls, something noteworthy, perhaps enough to get you elevated to troll management?

You got this, i believe in you.

Also, i'll save you some time , a reply that doesn't contain a quotable example of what you've claimed will just be ignored, no more engagement for you.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 months ago

All of the examples are in the OP. If you can't read, that's not something I can help you with.

[-] PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBIES@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah I'm not sure we're reading the same article

[-] Maerman@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

What? To 'sideload' an app, I do the following:

Open F-droid
Search for an app
Tap the install button

How is that different from the Google Play workflow?

[-] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That's not sideloading. You're happy to use a repository on F-Droid or Linux but not on Windows or Android.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 68 points 5 months ago

You know what. Fuck Linda Park, fuck this ass-kissing Google loving article. "designed to protect users from malicious software and scams" and the article keeps this tone throughout. This is not about protecting users! It's about tightening the grip on control of the app ecosystem.

Consider android authoritys article https://www.androidauthority.com/google-android-sideloading-unverified-apps-new-rules-3650343/

That at least has a little survey where you can express your take on this change

If you want a better perspective of the real impact of this for devs :
https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/24/google_android_developer_verification_plan/

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Good thing people on GrapheneOS, LineageOS and other Android OSs don't have to worry about this ~~...yet.~~

Edit: striking the "...yet" portion as it's irrelevant.

[-] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 months ago

Good thing google is simultaneously slow-rolling aosp releases

[-] IratePirate@feddit.org 5 points 5 months ago

You can lose the 'yet'. These projects aren't going to implement this, so we're good.

[-] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

There just won't be anything developed for them

[-] Delusion6903@discuss.online 11 points 5 months ago

What about apps that are already installed? Are they going to be blocked from running a soon as I upgrade?

My launcher is from F-Droid.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Really holding out on Motorolla to add their announced GrapheneOS support because I want my funni flip phone lol

[-] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

*downloading

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026

115 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

88664 readers

4287 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws