65
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] rayyy@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

Democrats can do much better. On the other hand, Republicans can't do much worse. Still, Kamala was way better than a felon pedophile, but this is how far America has fallen.
Who could have seen that all it would take is for a beast to hold the Bible upside down and backwards for Evangelicals to totally reject Jesus.

[-] BC_viper@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago
[-] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Exactly, she can't even beat a child rapist in an election.

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 55 points 5 months ago

If she wanted to run, she should be out there fighting facism. I'm not interested in voting for someone who's just letting all this shit happen.

[-] manualoverride@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

I’ve only seen her when she wanted to sell her book on speed-running losing an election.

She could be on TV and podcasts, 24/7 presenting the alternative and pointing out all the ways Trump is breaking the law and conning the country.

[-] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago

Oh I'm sure she'll soon be speaking at some big universities (for money) and she'll probably also be at a few DNC events...maybe; possibly; ever.

[-] BeUnique@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 months ago

Why would a centrist do that though?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Godort@lemmy.ca 53 points 5 months ago

I mean, Kamala Harris wants Kamala Harris to run

[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

If she thinks running again is going to go well, she'd delusional.

So yes, Kamala Harris wants Kamala Harris to run.

[-] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 52 points 5 months ago

The fact that there's even a whiff of Kamala running again is great evidence that we are so fucked and will continue to be so fucked.

[-] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago

To be fair, Hillary Clinton floated running again in 2020 and she never even launched that campaign. I don't think there's much intent behind this. I suppose it makes these former candidates feel special, or satiates some craving for attention :P

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Murse@slrpnk.net 34 points 5 months ago

Who Wants Kamala Harris to Run?

Netanyahu.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He's fine with any person who would be capable of being elected - US Government policy is to kiss Israel's ass regardless of which party is in charge. But a Republican would always be preferable to him.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Why did she run the first time? Why was she selected as VP after getting zero votes in the primary? Why was she pushed as the only option after Biden finally dropped out? Why is she still being discussed?

The fact that this is happening is showing that real decisions are being made without the voters being involved and whoever is making those decisions will win either way.

Also can someone post the article, it's paywalled.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Just stop already.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 5 months ago

I want her to run... Far far away from here.

[-] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago

"Pokemon GO... The fuck away!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 28 points 5 months ago

I want a real progressive to run is the main problem.

[-] ytsedude@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

neoliberal, centrist Democrats.

But I guess I spelled Republican again.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago

Harris even in discussion is proof that the US has degraded to a one party government.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chilldrivenspade@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

why not run a milquetoast loser again???

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

What's wrong? You don't like tax credits and genocide?

[-] CompGenius@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

She knows she wouldn't win. Just wants to fundraise, lose and sell another book.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

They needed someone out there on day 1 after the election to be the face and the presence of the DNC as a clear personality for the next run. Instead it’s likely you will get someone in the last five minutes.

[-] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 months ago

Absolutely not. No more typical status quo corporate liberals.

[-] DragonAce@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

This bitch lost the presidency to the worst piece of shit on the face of the planet. Why in the fuck does she think she has any chance trying to run again?

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
65 points (90.1% liked)

politics

31558 readers
2142 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS