this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
93 points (97.0% liked)

Europe

11680 readers
1110 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

That tech is not there. The cam has it's own status display on dashboard that shows"vigilance". On 5 hour drive on Interstate I got 0/5 maybe because I was wearing glasses?

There is so much stuff in modern cars that don't work the way you want it to, or plainly doesn't function. Dead-end menu items, touchscreen buttons that don't do anything, driving "assistance" for collision detection with many false positives...

I'd want the least amount of software in my car, but the industry marches blindly the other way, and they seemed to have inherited QA from Microsoft.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

AI will assess if they are looking at the road and, depending on speed, give a warning if they don't.

And I am totally sure it will not misread someone turning their head to secure a lane change going 220 km/h on the Autobahn and will not spook them with a sudden, unexpected alarm sound making the driver jerk the steering wheel causing a horrible crash.

[–] LinkeSocke@feddit.org 30 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

You talk like the whole Problem doesn't already start with a AI Camera filming you the entire time in your face. Modern Cars already sell a lot of data about you. Much more then you expect a car to know about you. Yea give them my facedata and a Videofeed of me... great idea...

We don't even need to talk about how these signals can spook someone. Such cameras should not be in the car in the first place

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The law mandates that data processing must happen locally.

That said, fuck these new systems.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Does it mandate that no other data processing can happen while sending it somewhere else?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] egrets@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

The rental cars I've used in Europe in the last few years are absolutely relentless with their warnings; it just becomes noise that you ignore.

It thinks you're not watching the road, it thinks the speed limit is 30kph when the signs say 80, it doesn't like that you've crossed into another lane to pass a cyclist, it's warm outside, it's cold outside, the person who just got into the car hasn't finished putting their seatbelt on, the bag on the back seat hasn't put its seatbelt on, your parking spot is within a meter of another car, the tires are 32 PSI instead of 33.

Alarm fatigue sets in really fast.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not like LLMs will be doing this - they just get lumped under the same vague "AI" label. I believe these types of systems are much more reliable. I'd also be surprised if the warning is anything as obnoxious as to cause the driver to jerk the steering wheel, because that would be a problem even if it is correct.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I know there are reliable AI applications, for example cancer recognition models scanning CT imaging.

However, from what I know systems trying pattern recognition in human behaviour are the opposite of these medical implementations.

[–] glasratz@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

I know there are reliable AI applications, for example cancer recognition models scanning CT imaging.

Those are not reliable at all and only meant as hints for the radiologist to check certain areas twice. They do not identify cancer but spots that may be out of place. However, not all radiologists seem to know that and a relative of mine would have been pushed into end-of-life care if not for the intervention of another doctor in the family. He had to take it up to the head of department, though. The spots in question turned out to be old scarring and could have been easily identified if the radiologist had also consulted older scans as would have been her damned job. Instead she thought the AI was thinking for her.

Similar software also exists for spotting tooth cavities. It's useful, but not to be trusted.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Those signals are as subtle and obvious as all other signals a car can give. This system has already existed for many years and already exists in many cars. You can easily ignore it.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)
[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Technology is god and will solve all our problems. At least in politician’s minds.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Boingboing_r@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I read the other day that laws are being passed by people with chauffeurs for people who drive cars and I cant get that out of my mind.

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That exactly is the problem with most laws passed these days. The political caste is so disconnected from normal everyday life of normal people that they aren't even impacted directly by them anymore, so even if they wanted to, they can't make normal laws for normal people.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can thank the European car industry for this. They've lobbied for this to become law.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Probably, but it's certainly more complicated. Fiat complained about the added cost of such systems. On the low budget end, this adds a noticeable chunk to the price. Bad for sales in the EU, added complications for export. I could imagine the "premium brands" like such regulations that remove some competition.

The yahoo post in OP is a press release by a Swedish tech company that makes such systems. They're not exactly part of the car industry, but they claim to have lobbied for this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Notice how these "Liberals", even after watching America fall to fascism and their own domestic resurgence, are continuing to implement all the tools necessary for big brother style totalitarianism? How they're continuing to implement big brother FOR fascism?

It's almost like they work for the same interests...

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

A shame that most people don't seem to grasp something so simple as that.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Are you using "liberal" in the US sense here or in the correct sense?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My 2001 car is looking more beautiful than ever

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Cars built much later than 2010 are pretty much all piles of junk by design. Unrepairable, unmaintainable, technically owned by the manufacturers rather than their owners.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The 2 downvotes are automakers

Or professional enshittificators.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Given that my 2004 Chrysler had the battery behind the front wheel I’m gonna go ahead and need you to caveat that.

Some manufacturers were ahead of their time with enshittification.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not entirely true. The EU mandates a "driver drowsiness and attention warning". It doesn't mandate the use of cameras. The word "camera" is not mentioned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

The EU obsession with expanding their surveillance state is insane.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago

Another reason not to get a car again!

[–] sniggleboots@europe.pub 9 points 3 weeks ago

Riding a motorcycle has never felt so free

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't I just tape the fucking camera? Whats the point of this?

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No you can not. If you do, it will trigger an emergency stop after a minute.

And no, I am not kidding. I have tried this on a new car just a few days ago.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

No you can not. If you do, it will trigger an emergency stop after a minute.

Bull. Shit. Why are people spreading those lies?

"Upon detection of permanent failure in the ADDW system, a constant visual failure warning signal shall be provided."

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=intcom%3AC%282023%294523

Warning signal. That's it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Recently I accepted a new job, and it will come with a new company car.

If I happen to get a model that was sold after this rule goes into effect, I'm planning to tape off the camera.
Hopefully that should be enough to "fool" the systems in question

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

I hope you will enjoy the constant chime going off and the constant alerts on the dashboard

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Don’t worry, taping the camera will result in the vehicle braking to standstill after a minute. (No joke…)

My experience with driver aids and safety systems is limited to 2023 models but the implementation of everything from skid control to lane centering depends so much on the manufacturer’s implementation. My observation from a limited number of cars is that stability control quality scales with vehicle price, but reviews indicate that the ADAS does not.

I’ve driven two vehicles from the same company with the same features and different shape (ie bumper and windshield height) and one consistently β€œlost” view of a flatbed truck, which isn’t confidence inspiring.

Like reversing cameras, the products range from potatovision 480i to 4k UHD.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Since July 7, all new vehicles must have an "advanced driver distraction warning" (ADDW) system. That means that there will be a (probably IR) camera constantly monitoring the driver. AI will assess if they are looking at the road and, depending on speed, give a warning if they don't.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM%3AC%282023%294523

[–] BigShammy80@feddit.org 13 points 3 weeks ago

My cheap Suzuki Swift from last year has this already. It warns me when i look around, being tired and so on.

It is not very accurate i might add...

[–] kbal@fedia.io 6 points 3 weeks ago

Weird. Is this a typo? They must've written "mandate" where they meant "prohibit" or something.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Duct tape has a new fan now.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

This only works if the car drives at all without 'detecting' a driver.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

You think nobody thought of that? The vehicle will refuse to drive if it can not see you.

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 5 points 3 weeks ago

Startling drivers while operating a vehicle on the road. What could possibly go wrong?

[–] onipa@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί