this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
27 points (86.5% liked)

movies

3710 readers
847 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Press release from Fathom Entertainment:

Before the Sunrise, experience the Mockingjay’s epic adventure on the big screen. Whether you’ve followed the rebellion from the beginning or are meeting Katniss for the first time, the Games await. The colorful characters, heart-stopping action, and struggle for the nation of Panem’s future all lie within The Hunger Games, The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 1, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 2, and The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes.

This September, Reignite the Spark.

Each film features new sneak peeks into the upcoming The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lethalspatula@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They made 5 of these fucking things???

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 weeks ago

They're making a sixth, the author wrote two prequel books. The original run was four films, one each for the first two books and two films for the third book.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Took the words right out of my mouth.

The best one of the entire series was The Starving Games.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

i dint even know they made that many.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Am I the only one who sees old movies returning to theaters as nothing more than a low effort cash grab?

Make new movies or get out of the business.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I saw Alien when it had a 40th(?) anniversary run in the theaters and that was cool since I was only 2 years old when it came out. Several movies from the 80s like Labyrinth were fun to see in the theater decades later. Great movies returning to theaters long after their first run is pretty fucking awesome.

I never saw the hunger games ones though so I don't really care, but good for those that liked them getting a chance to see them on the big screen again.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I won't deny that the theater experience is different than watching it at home. I remember watching revenge of the sith in theaters when it came out and it was an amazing experience.

I'm simply pointing out that it's a cheap gimmick to make money off of things that have been out for years.

The movie industry is a multi-billion dollar industry yet they just recycle the same shit over and over.

[–] B0NK3RS@lazysoci.al 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This example is kinda trash but to be fair I've been to see others like Princess Mononoke and Coraline which I didn't get to experience beforehand at the theatre and it was awesome.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I’d rather see a movie I already know I like in theaters than see another shitty sequel/remake.

Plus, those showings can be really fun with the right crowd. I watched the LOTR extended editions in theaters, and people got decked out like it was a ren faire. I met so many cool people.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Make new movies

They did. This is a lead up to their new film.

In terms of it being a low effort cash grab... Yes? But also they're putting films in theaters people want to see. Putting "old" films in theaters is pretty common. It's probably one screen a day for a few days, it doesn't take away from any other ongoing film.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I go to the Alamo specifically to see old movies on the Big Screen.

Some just aren't the same on even a large home screen, such as Lawrence of Arabia, or Spartacus (two the Alamo are currently playing). And some movies I've never been able to see on the Big Screen (such as the aforementioned).

I don't have to go, I choose to go for the experience.

Alamo doesn't make the movies, so your argument doesn't even make sense.

Edit: Though I agree with your general sentiment - make movies I'm willing to go see, instead of all the garbage and mediocrity

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

If it's a theater that's known for playing older movies that's fine. I had a dollar movie theater near me when I was younger and loved it but big box office theaters playing old movies just because of an anniversary just feels cheap and low effort. Especially considering the costs nowadays.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps, but if so it's the most harmless kind of cash grab. Getting to see a beloved classic in the theater is nice, especially if I didn't get to see it back in the day. I've been looking forward to the Ghibli reruns. They get some cash to grab, I get to see Princess Mononoke on IMAX, sounds fair to me.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

No. It is most definitely a low effort cash grab and nothing more.

However, I am a big fan of cinemas independently screening older films from time to time or as part of a themed series. As others have said, sometimes you miss films the first time around and it's a great opportunity to watch them for the first time in a cinema.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Idk, I had no issue with LOTR returning to theaters here. I didn't go, but it's a great trilogy with tons of beautiful imagery, why wouldn't you want to watch it on the big screen?

Then there's movies that get sequels long after the original. The original Top Gun was shown before Top Gun: Maverick and I believe Avatar before Avatar 2. Because it's been a long time and people might want a refresher.

But I don't know who wants to go watch hunger games in theaters again. The movies aren't that old and I don't remember them being cinematic masterpieces.

[–] Aetherial@nord.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Also, and I'm going to get dog piled on this, this movie franchise wasn't even that great. Ofc it's a cash grab.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Don't think of it like that, think of it more like... watching old movies at the end of the world.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

yes that is it, they ran out of ideas, that isnt SLOP.

[–] Angryhumanoid@fedinsfw.app 6 points 2 weeks ago

Well tell them to go away.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

The first one was fine. I really enjoyed the second one and was bored with the third and never saw the fourth one.

I started the prequel recently and sort of forgot about it in real time so I never finished it.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 1 points 2 weeks ago

I got the box set recently with the original movies. I do not care much for the prequel, neither book nor movie version. The prequel destroys parts of the continuity and integrity of the original work.

Still think the original Hunger Games books and movies hold up and they are somehow more relevant today than they were when they were released.

It's too bad that people look down on them for being girly movies, when they actually tap into some pretty complex topics that will never get old. Also, Jennifer Lawrence is a great actress and her performances in these movies are fantastic. Just saying.

I will never get over than scene in the final movie where she yells at the cat in her old house. That shit hurts.