this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
138 points (99.3% liked)

Progressive Politics

4828 readers
458 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/49776822

The House voted 216-214 on a budget reconciliation framework that includes $10 billion worth of election-related grants over a 10-year period for coaxing states into adopting anti-voting measures like those in Trump’s pet proposal. The $95 billion package also includes funding for the Iran war and bailouts for farmers hurt by Trump’s tariffs.

It’s still unclear what will be in the final reconciliation bill; now that the budget resolution has been approved, individual House committees will go about drafting the legislation. The reconciliation process allows Senate Republicans to bypass the filibuster’s 60-vote threshold and pass legislation with a simple majority.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is really depressing. I thought it would get blocked in the senate.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is the House. It hasn't gotten through the Senate.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 days ago

Chuck Schumer is in charge of the Democratic caucus, it'll pass by one vote.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I know, but the senate won't need a super majority now, it'll probably pass.

The reconciliation process allows Senate Republicans to bypass the filibuster’s 60-vote threshold and pass legislation with a simple majority.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The article is also saying it's still unlikely though:

Despite Republican control of the Senate, it is unlikely that Trump will see any version of SAVE enacted ahead of the midterms.

Legislation passed through reconciliation must be budgetary in nature. The Senate parliamentarian, the chamber’s procedural umpire, ruled last month that the SAVE America provisions did not fit the bill, leading Trump to call for her ouster.

Even if these new, still-unknown provisions aren’t removed procedurally, the last time the Senate voted on the SAVE America Act, four Republicans voted against it, meaning it failed to receive even a majority’s support.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has also downplayed the proposal’s chances amid legislative strategy differences with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). While the House passed a short-term stopgap funding bill Tuesday to avoid a government shutdown when the current fiscal year ends Sept. 30, Thune prefers a different spending package that he hopes to strongarm Democrats into supporting by threatening to use reconciliation if they don’t.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

Well that's good news, I hope it doesn't get shoved through somehow. Orange man wants this so bad for a nefarious reason.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Centrist democrats demonstrating once again that they're complicit with fascism.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 5 days ago (3 children)

This bullshit is going to become law, isn't it

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It actively harms the American people while directly benefiting the elite, so yes.

[–] homes@piefed.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It doesn’t have enough votes to get through the Senate, thank goodness

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

i believe the reconiliation bill doesnt need 60 senate votes, which is what the GOP/old guard DINO is hoping for.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

they snuck in the save act, under the guise of the stock trading ban, which doesnt block the trading, because it allows the insider trading to sell it before it comes into effect.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

So if we can't vote, does that mean we don't have to pay taxes?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

If you don't pay your taxes, you go to a jail and all your shit is confiscated

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Also, slavery has always been legal in the US if you're convicted of a bad enough crime. Once they make poverty illegal, boom! Cheap labor

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago

wage slaves is just, outright slavery with extra steps.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

or go to jury duty, Voter rolls is one of the places they try to drag people to JD, i thinks thier primary source, followed by DMV driver/STATE ID.

[–] 007ace@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

i think thats the ol' no taxation without representation language. But Im Canadian so I only know bits and pieces.

[–] a_good_hunter@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Fascists win!

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[–] DoubleDongle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Is the parliamentarian just not going to gut it this time?