Ignorance is not knowing something.
Stupidity is not having the ability to know something.
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
23 points (78.0% liked)
No Stupid Questions
49134 readers
744 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Ignorance is not knowing things (e.g. facts).
Stupidity is not being about to think about things (e.g. lacking reason, being unable to make a good decision even when given all the useful information).
Making a bad decision out of ignorance isn't necessarily stupid. Making a bad decision despite knowing the consequences is.
Ignorance can be remedied through education. Stupidity, not so much...
That said, most people could be smarter if they were taught to think, but thinking ability is not the same as knowing facts.
Ignorance: Lack of information. Stupidity: Inadequate usage of logical reasoning to seek and process information.
That's how I understand it
Ignorance is not knowing things.
Stupidity is refusing to learn things.
Stupidity is also inability to learn
inability to learn is a choice.
they do not want to make the effort.
whether or not that effort is worthwhile, however, is the question.
I am learning Russian. lots of people I met recently, love to tell me how stupid it is because it's not a 'useful' thing to learn.
inability to learn is a choice.
Not always. Someone close to me has issues with executive dysfunction and short term memory as a result of brain trauma. She really struggles with algebra and she'll almost certainly never learn calculus even if she wanted to.
lots of people I met recently, love to tell me how stupid it is because it's not a 'useful' thing to learn.
That's a different issue entirely. If they think they're experts at judging what's useful, that may be the Dunning-Kruger effect.
I think we overuse dunning kruger. "useful" is very contextual. I would agree that for many people it would take some specific and dare I say unusual circumstances where learning another language is particularly useful to them. There's some use in that you get a bit of a puzzle to overcome, you can potentially eventually get good enough to consume content in this other language (though one thing LLMs are pretty good at is translation), maybe you get a more direct exposure to Dovstoyestky (sp?). Cool and all, but probably not going to get them a better job or help them with most life tasks.
Cognitive impairments and differing cognitive ability are very much real things 😅 people can have an inability to learn, and/or an unwillingness to learn, but there very much are people who have the former and not the latter
Struggling to learn things is very much not always a choice
those people can learn plenty well.
it just takes more time and effort.
You're dismissing entire categories of cognitive impairment. Not just the varieties of dementia, but also learning disabilities like dyslexia (reading), dysgraphia (writing), and dyscalculia (math) that can affect otherwise smart and capable people. These are measurable impairments, not just a difficulty that can be overcome with time and effort.
https://neurolaunch.com/cognitive-disorders-list/
It would be wise to be more careful with your sweeping statements.
i know people who have all this problems in my family.
you know how they over come them?
by making an effort and achieving their goals.
i've also known plenty of people who sit around and whine about their disability and refuse to make any effort to improve their life, and blame everyone else for being 'privileged' than them, including myself.
weird how that works. almost like not everyone defines themselves as a hapless victim.
I'm trying to steer this away from subjective topics like motivation and effort here. I'm talking about neural hardware with concrete, quantifiable impediments that lead to poor functionality compared to the general populace. Things like physical brain damage or incomplete cortical development.
This genuinely affects quality of life for real people regardless of their mood or whether they consider themselves a victim or any other non-scientific generalizations.
I don't know whether your family members were actually tested by a credentialed psychologist or psychiatrist, or if they were merely self-diagnosed. I won't make any assumptions there but please know there is an huge difference in terms of accuracy.
life is subjective. you can steer it away from that all you want, but personal accountability is the name of the game for everyone, disabled or not.
no, they are officially diagnosed and had lots of professional support. you know what the differences between their failures and successes were? putting in the effort. when they studied and practiced, they got good grades and succeed. when they didn't, they failed.
it's almost like learning things is about making the effort to learn them.
according to your philosophy here, nobody can ever run a marathon if they aren't already athletic. that isn't true. almost anyone can do it, they simple have to train their body to do it. and if they are disabled, they use a wheelchair or other accessibility device. they still need to train.
I'm not disagreeing that there's an entire category of people with impairments who can overcome most of the barriers through effort and perseverance. That's absolutely a thing. Please don't think I'm dismissing that.
I'm saying there is also a category of people who will sadly never overcome their impairment though any amount of effort, or really anything short of a miracle. The simplest illustration is at the extreme end -- a person with advanced Alzheimer's is never going to become a pro athlete nor a Jeopardy champion, at least not without major groundbreaking advancements in medicine.
You seem to be making the argument that only the first category exists but not the second, which is just not true.
Ignorance can be used to refer to both cases.
yeah but that's a phrase not a word: "willful ignorance."
It's used interchangeably. Willful is added when people want to be clearer and more specific.
I don't know and I don't care
Ignorance is simply the absense of knowledge. A newborn baby, for example, is ignorant of pretty much everything in the world.
Stupidity is knowing something is wrong and doing it/saying it anyway.
You can be ignorant on a specific subject, but stupidity is universal.
Ignorance characterizes knowledge; stupidity characterizes behavior.
You can be ignorant without being stupid and stupid without being ignorant, but they tend to be correlated because neglecting knowledge is stupid behavior.
Ignorance is an overlapping circle with stupidity. If you are ignorant about something, you do not possess knowledge of it. Perhaps you've not been exposed to the information yet, or aren't old enough to comprehend it. In such cases, you may be ignorant but not stupid.
If you are stupid, you have failed to acquire knowledge that you should have, given your circumstances, or you come to incorrect conclusions based on the correct knowledge you have acquired. In the former case, you are both stupid and ignorant; in the latter, only stupid.
I feel most of the comments try to separate these two too much too. I mean yes, in the most basic form ignoro means to not know. Which seems innocuous enough in its elf, but a lot of ignorant people will often not admit (be it to themselves or others) that they’re ignorant. And I don’t know whether that’s stubbornness, stupidity, pride or whatever.
Now we’re seeing more and more people who feel cool and tough about themselves because of their ignorance.
People, like AI , can state bullshit with such conviction it may even fool other ignorant and stupid people. Meanwhile people actually might have a good idea or something to say get laughed at. Providing back up for your statements with evidence Is useless in this post-truth
Those people are also stupid.
By that logic, everyone is extremely stupid, since it's impossible to know everything. It's actually impossible to be intelligent.
There are different kinds of stupidity and ignorance.
And yes, there are lots of differences. Often the stupid person is the person who expects other people to not be ignorant of what they know, and makes other people feel stupid, and thus destroys any chance anyone has of learning from each other.
Lots of stupid people, can't admit their ignorance. And lots of people can't admit they made a mistake, and thus remain ignorant.
By feeling, stupid feels like lack of ability to learn and ignorant feels like lazy/avoidant of something you could learn (though you could also be kept in ignorance by another person/a system)
Stupidity isn't just lack of knowledge, it's lack of wisdom. Lack of ability to think about your knowledge and apply it
In my opinion, and the fact that it's just an opinion is part of the answer itself, the term stupidity or stupid doesn't really mean much of anything. As you say it has a lot of overlap with the concept of ignorance, the main reason someone might choose to use one term over the other is to make it derogatory, or to express displeasure with a person or action. If you're neutral about someone lacking knowledge of something, you think they're "ignorant" if you are annoyed by this or don't like that person, you think they're "stupid".
However if you look up "stupid" in the dictionary there is a bit of a difference. It focusses more on cognitive capacity than knowledge. So if you don't know things because you're inherently lacking in the ability to learn them effectively, people might say you're stupid, whereas if you don't know things because there was simply no opportunity for you ever to have learned them, then you're ignorant.
Ignorant = doesn't know yet.
Stupid = knows better but does it anyway.
The ignorant usually improve. The stupid usually don't.
Ignorance is being uninformed.
Stupidity is to either ignore or not understand or to intentionally (willfully) stay uninformed.
Ignorance is not knowing the words have different definitions. Stupidity is refusing to look up either, and instead crowdsourcing the answer.
Ignorance is not knowing something. Stupidity is knowing something and acting like you don't.
We are all ignorant, stupid.
i think ignorance is reject learn things that you dont knew stupidity is do things thinking that you knew it, but not. (sorry my bad english)
I'm sorry that this doesn't at all answer the question...But I just had to link this incredibly iconic moment from King of the Hill.
Ignorance is a clack of knowledge.
Stupidity is a choice to not learn.
Some one who is ignorant, can cure that by learning. Some one who is stupid never will.
Ignorance is not knowing what Lemmy is.
Stupidity is to sign up and continuing to use Lemmy anyways.
;p
huh?
This guy gets it.
Ignorance is not knowing. Stupidity is not applying what you know. Think of the friends meme...
Ignorant is more specific, only applies when someone doesn't know or doesn't want to know something. That can be referred to as stupid, but stupid can also refer to any other kind of stupidity, such as struggling to work out a basic math or logic puzzle, or failing to follow basic instructions.