this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
689 points (98.2% liked)

memes

22085 readers
3453 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 27 minutes ago

All I want these days is a "Don't show me any fucking AI slop" setting and a button to report AI slop.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 28 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Back in my day, memes weren't Ai "enhanced" and Bart didn't have a vagina for an ear.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What is going on with that vaginear anyway? And the random grass rectangle.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 1 points 4 hours ago

new darwinism dropped: survive of the vaginear-en-ist

[–] Sandbar_Trekker@piefed.zip 7 points 3 hours ago

The dislikes were great at telling me quickly if a tutorial was good or not.

Now you generally have to check the top comments to see if there's something wrong about the tutorial, but then YouTube started hiding those comments below ads/recommendations.

Now I just use GrayJay and I can quickly check comments for any video.

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 28 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You sweet summer child, back in my day YouTube had a five star rating system and video response functionality.

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Gotta say, don't miss video responses. It was nearly all irrelevant content and people trying to advertise their own channels

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Perfectly true. It would've been nice, if it wasn't so inherently abusable. We can't have nice things.

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

Could imagine that working at the scale where PeerTube is currently at, where you can actually get to know folks and it's not just about broadcasting to as many people as possible...

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

YouTube used to not have ads.

[–] laurenceOfSuburbia@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

yeh. pepperidge farms members. "broadcast yourself" my ass

You're supposed to use only fans to broadcast your ass fyi

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 14 points 5 hours ago

Back in my day, you could customize your YouTube profile and PM anyone on the platform

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 133 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

Back in my day, YouTube had a 5-star rating system

[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 39 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

and search results showed only videos related to your search. recommendations on the side were similar videos and not some unrelated bullshit. it was so much better.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly if someone remade an old YouTube alternative I think it would take off.

It’s what I wish PeerTube was, but I’m not sure if that will ever take off sadly.

Lack of advertising dollars is definitely an impediment to video platform alternatives…

I remember a time when people just posted silly little shitty drawn videos just for the fun of it. Not saying creators shouldn’t be compensated for their hard work, I just feel like something was lost with the monetization of every little thing.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The trouble is hosting that much video content and the bandwidth to feed viewers.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Maybe when the AI bubble bursts, people will buy up abandoned data centers for pennies on the dollar and repurpose them for a better Youtube alternative. And maybe Margot Robbie will see this comment and fall in love with me.

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

People really fail to understand what a truly colossal undertaking a site like YouTube is. It's a technological wonder that they are able to process that much data and serve it so efficiently. Hate YouTube all you want, I do, but the engineers at Google are fucking magicians.

[–] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Last I heard it was something on the order of 700 hours of video content uploaded per minute. Insane.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 61 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

And the video's rating was plainly visible so you could use it to make the decision whether the video was even worth your click.

The shovelware AI slop video channels wouldn't be such a problem today if we still had that.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 13 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Going straight to YouTube is like going straight to Imgur looking for good content. Should never be done. Places like Lemmy or friend chat groups refer me to good videos. Or my curated subscribed channels with quality content is the other way I watch youtube.

Anyone going straight to YouTube.com looking for their algorithm and ratings system to tell them about shit content in advance is mistaken in their expectations.

[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

extensive use of the "Don't recommend this video > Tell us why > I don't like this video" function, plus removing bad videos from my watch history after I stop watching, has got me a well-trained slop-free recommendations page with interesting new smallish channels.

[–] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah it can definitely be somewhat trained. Also the extention dearrow makes a big difference in the experience too.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Usually I go there looking for something specific and use the search bar.

However, the search function in YouTube has also turned to absolute crap. It only lists a few results and then switches to random shit you didn't ask for.

A lot of the results are also often misleading titles leading to lazy videos that are a slideshow of impertinent pictures with a synthetized voice spewing inaccurate information. AI has made that even worse. The star rating system would have helped identify these crap videos before you click on them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fistac0rpse@fedia.io 29 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

no one uses the return YouTube dislikes browser extension?

[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

What's the point, if downvotes are no longer a factor in the YT backend?

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago

It's more complicated than that. The button still exists even without the add-on and the back end factors it in and I think shows the creator, but doesn't show it to the front end. So the add-on doesn't have the real numbers but there still are real numbers

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

To save you time avoiding a bad instructional video.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

It's a good enough approximation. Do you really need to know if the massively downvoted video had 357,923 downvotes or 357,924?

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 12 points 8 hours ago

I don’t want my watchlist stored on a random third party server

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 hours ago

And this meme wasn't AI upscaled

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

I hate the one-sided engagement button. It elevates trash.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

It still does, it just doesn't show numbers because YouTube is a coward.

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 16 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

No the API is dead. The extension everyone is using calculates their own dislike number by inferring from the extension users who disliked the video

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck yourube lol, couldn't care less if the like button and the rest of the website disappeared too

Man, influencers and looksmaxxing idiots are gonna starve if that happens. How we will know the world is turning into a fucking clown show without it???

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 16 points 8 hours ago

We're all being punished because Google's feelings got hurt when we didn't like the 2018 YouTube Rewind enough. That was the end of the dislike button and the YouTube Rewind altogether.

[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

back in my day, you posted about your life in your geocities website! And you wrote the html on notepad and had to include an animated gif that told people to email you, cause that was the style at the time.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If you had Office you could use Microsoft Office FrontPage

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›