this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
530 points (95.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46907 readers
1111 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This design looks so cheap to me, it's just a bunch of random covers, there is no information about the movies presented in any way, the covers are way too big and take up an inordinate amount of space and there is nothing breaking up sections, design is just so fucking dumb now, fuck mobile

rant over πŸ˜…

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And make sure everything you mouseover trying to get a blurb or something instead just jumps around like a Jack Russell terrier trying to grab your attention. I fucking hate having to find a place to park my mouse so it isn't autoplaying some bullshit I have no interest in.

[–] arran4@aussie.zone 3 points 2 hours ago

Or worse finding a space where something doesn't auto play but scroll does work (when on a computer.)

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

I mean, if they could let you click on the picture and it "flips" over and then there's some info and a few stills from the movie... This was how Video Rental stores worked for years.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The large cover design isn't even the worst bit, it's how hard it is to find concrete genre categories in a lot of these streaming apps. You'd have a bunch of overlapping categories like most popular whatever in whereever and so on, they quite literally hide the option to just go to movies -> genre -> list everything in some apps (Netflix was hard to find at some point).

Now I just pirate whatever old movies come to mind and stuff them in Jellyfin. Right now it's Minority Report. Up next... Hmm I downloaded man from U.N.C.L.E the other day, might watch that.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

Which app is this?

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Everything about using the internet and its various β€œservices” has turned to absolute garbage in the last 15 years.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 7 hours ago

It's what happens when you let marketing dickheads be in charge of everything.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 2 points 6 hours ago

Our bold, brilliant leaders and innovators once again doing what everyone else is doing, even when it is stupid.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Click on a cover to get more info.

Honestly it feels a bit like browsing a shelf of books or DvD boxes or something. It certainly could have some improvements but I don’t think this is that bad.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I dont mind the Top 10 Carousel, but it would be nice if it has a Title and a Rating under it.

A lot of the "For You" algorithm stuff is fine, but I would prefer to have that in a Table. Title, Synopsis, Rating, length, Director, Cast. so if it sounds interesting, I can click through, but I am not going back and forth constantly.

Also gimmie a bit list I can sort. You can even have things like Movie Posters show when hovering over the name.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

A big part of it is keeping you on the site, engaged. It's best if you are watching a movie, but browsing around is good, too. At least they aren't on a competitor's site.

They don't want to show you ratings, because that will make it obvious how shit their catalog is.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

but if you mouse over the cover, it starts autoplaying a preview and you can't stop it

[–] kludge@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

It's pretty terrible for the VI/Blind community

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Even worse when the streaming site publishes it under multiple covers. So freaking annoying.

Way too often I see a cover I don’t recognize and think it might be something I’d like, but get a couple minutes in before realizing I’ve seen it before.

I imagine it’s marketing trying to see what cover gets the most clicks but at the cost of annoying its customers

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't look at all the comments, but this is intentional. One of the streaming platforms (probably Netflix or Amazon) originally made an algorithm that tailors posters to the individual. It's the usual A/B testing psychological bullshit designed to maximize your likelihood of watching a movie.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

My wife watched The Get Down and another series I think it was called "Woke" (two series with predominantly black cast) back to back in the same weekend and the Netflix algorithm started to put the black character of every show as the center piece on every picture. Like we already watched house of card, we know that the black lobbyist guy is barely a support character, don't try to fool us putting him in the center of the poster

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so happy I don't have Netflix... That sounds extreamly manipulative. Interesting to know they do this but not surprising since it's Netflix.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

One of the reasons I dropped Netflix was because they kept changing the pictures on shit so I'd think there was new content only to see id already watched it when I clicked on it. That got old quick. Don't have that issue when I just pirate shit.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

Exactly. User hostile methods like this are a deal breaker.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 41 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

Web/UI design in general has sucked for at least 14 years now. Everything is spaced too far apart and text/images are too big. Icons are used for critical functionality instead of words. Pointless animations and gradients slow everything down for no reason.

The thing that drives me the craziest is when a long title or sentence or whatever is just truncated with ellipses, even when there is ENORMOUS blank white space around it that would easily allow the whole thing to be shown with word-wrapping. Youtube shorts is the most egregious example of this, and they recently managed to make it even worse. It used to be that you could open up the comments for a short and that would make the entire long title readable, but they "fixed" that so it stays ellipsized even then.

The app I use at work to clock in and out ellipsizes my own name halfway through my middle name, and it could be easily fixed by just stretching the control that displays the name all the way to each edge. I used to be a mobile app developer and I know exactly why this happens: the UI designer uses a bogus short name like "Bob Smith" on the original design document and the developer who implements it puts in a control just big enough for that. I used to encounter this kind of thing and I would fix it with common sense, and then the UI designer would get mad and insist that my fix be reverted, even though that resulted in something that couldn't display the information properly.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

What difference are you seeing that I'm not?

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

I think the main complaint is that your examples show detail about the movie, not just a close up of someone's face

For example jaws has a giant shark attacking a person. Compare that to a close up of Bane's face. You might not even realize it's a batman movie of you aren't familiar with it already.

Star wars poster shows space ships and laser sword.

Many movie posters are just the main characters now with head shots vs trying to tell a story.

I don't full agree with the op, just my interpretation of what I think they are complaining about

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

What we really need is an app that uses the Ghanaian movie posters.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I thought it was about the website design as opposed to the posters. Like why dont you get a small infobox for every movie with name, runtime, age-rating, plotsummary... Instead its just the posters

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

But words make people read and reading is one of videos competitors.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

A Netflix listing doesn't need to be same as outside a movie theater. They can be more similar to a tv guide.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 55 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (24 children)

My local movie theater in the heart of downtown has taken down all the movie posters outside the entrance and replaced them with a single screen that only shows ads for overpriced popcorn "deals".

Before, anyone walking by knew which movies were currently playing; now, all they know is just how outrageously expensive the popcorn is.

I haven't been to that theater since.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 135 points 23 hours ago (17 children)

UI's for movie streaming services are not designed to help you find something to watch. They are designed to keep you "engaged", which means in the platform and not realizing that the pool of actually interesting things is about as deep as a puddle. Everything about streaming sites' design is user hostile and this is a classic example of that.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί