this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
280 points (99.6% liked)

News

38558 readers
1350 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A blood supply shortage in the US has reached a "crisis" level, according to the American Red Cross, which says it is the second time in its 150-year history that levels have been this low.

Factors including wildfires and extreme heat have combined to create the current situation, Dr Courtney Lawrence, who works with the American Red Cross, told the BBC.

Supply levels dropped by a quarter just last month. The crisis has struck during summer, when the amount of blood needed by hospitals typically increases.

That is because of an increased number of car accidents and more people spending time outdoors, resulting in more injuries that require blood transfusions, Lawrence said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 minutes ago

They used it all trying to bring mcconnell back to life

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Why would I donate blood so whoever can charge someone $25k to use it?

[–] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh my god dude just take some time off the internet.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world -1 points 51 minutes ago

You ever been to a hospital in the USA? Not even that hyperbolic of a comment.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Because it's painless, barely takes any time, and can save a life.

I try to do it whenever I can, but sadly recently tats and piercings are a common disqualifying factor.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

Yeah, it's the right thing to do and paying for blood can contaminate the results and get very dystopian

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

Because ultimately it is needed to save someone's life, and there's no other way allowed to get it to them.

[–] sploder@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

My mom is an ER nurse and she said a few times a year they get a batch of defective bags. You try to use them and they just burst, like they’re sealed wrong. So that sucks.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

There is too much microplastics in our blood now that not even vampires wanna touch that shit.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm o negative and I donated blood once. I shit you not, they called me hundreds of times after that. They called me once or twice a day for months.

I asked them to change my phone number, to remove my phone number, to please stop calling. I told them that I had died, that I'd taken up heroin as a hobby, that I'd begun having gay sex. They kept calling.

I will never donate blood again.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 0 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

Oh no you’re slightly inconvenienced. The horror!

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 50 minutes ago

Fuck off. Constant spam calls are not a negligible inconvenience.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 13 points 9 hours ago

O negative is one of the most valuable blood types. So they obviously want it.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

isnt there still a shit ton of restrictions for people, making its extremely inconvenient, plus the sites that does the donations are very low in each city. like you have std, or taking medication, or had sex,,,,etc.

even though they "soft-lifted the resitrction from gay men, there still potential for discrimination.

It's wild, they do "batch testing" with samples from many different people in one go, and if anything turns up positive, they discard everyone's donations. I used to donate plasma, but a batch test revealed somebody with hepatitis. I immediately went to a doctor to get tested and it came up negative. Unfortunately, due to having my sample in the batch test, I was already deferred from ever donating anything in the US again.

Random people have told me there are ways to get back on the donor list, but that's not what I was told by professionals. So here I am, with perfectly fine blood, barred from donating because I happened to donate at the same time as somebody who was sick. Such a great system.

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Supplies of every blood type are currently needed, but especially O positive.

Wouldn't that be O negative, the universal donor?

[–] Fedop@slrpnk.net 19 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

O positive is the most common blood type, and apperently O-neg folk can handle O-pos once, so O-pos is generally the most commonly used for a crisis. Source: MD partner just checked openevidence Edit: O-pos is 40% of the population, O-neg is 6%, so they prefer to use O-pos. The real risk is just not having enough blood. Reading more, some 2019 source says only 1 in 2 million O-neg would die from O-pos blood. So really, almost everyone can use O-pos

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 7 points 18 hours ago

TIL thank you for the education.

[–] quantumcrop@lemmy.today 4 points 18 hours ago

They're just looking on the bright side, stop with the negativity. /s

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 18 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Donating blood can slightly reduce your amount of microplastics and PFAS since the blood your body makes to replace the donated blood will not contain those things.

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 12 points 18 hours ago

I used to joke that the reason I donated was to reduce the microplastics in my blood. I feel so pleasantly vindicated now.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's if you consume non-contaminated fluids and solid foods, right?

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

Well, those things probably just accumulate in your body over time. So loosing some blood will reduce the concentration, even if you don't avoid intake.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Donating has always been on my to-do list, but I just never made the time. I think I did it once 25 years ago in high school.

I finally made the time about a month ago, and they made it so easy I told them to keep a standing appointment every two months (the maximum.) Found out I'm O-, so I feel like I'm doing some real good.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (7 children)

If you're O- you're going to be begged to donate for the rest of your life now

An O- friend of mine donated blood ~10 years ago before learning he can get paid for plasma donations. 10 years of regular plasma donations (and no blood donations), he still gets monthly calls asking him to donate blood

Gotta make ends meet though. Free cookies and juice don't pay rent

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›