this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
336 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

87184 readers
6293 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unspkbl_horror@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I don't even think anyone is clear on what they are supposedly working toward, which appears to be some kind of singularity AI god a la Hyperion's TechnoCore... this shit is feeling more like Christiantiy every day.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I would say a lot of people would like competent assistants to do stuff like "Show me every email that mentions a hard drive order." But not the AI they are trying to foist on us now.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

What drives me up a fucking wall these days is how people will use AI to make a more “professional” message, then due to it’s verbosity it needs an AI to summarize on the receiving end.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My attitude is if you put no effort into creating something then I will put no effort into consuming it.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

My AI will talk to your AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Or read disclosure for my members so I don't have to. But that it fucking things are fucking incompetent. Work insurance people will get line pissed that got me instead of banking. They will say I told the AI I needed to order checks. Yet it sends them to insurance division instead of banking.

Sucks because most customers hate AI answering the phone I especially hate it. It fucking dumb and I just want to talk to person.

But even job hunting had two prospective jobs tried to use AI to conduct the interview. They fucking outsourcing that. I refused both interviews.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI is basically evil people raising prices of electricity, consumer electronics, emitting tons of pollution and making everyone dumber but don't worry because if they succeed... everyone will get fired. Everyone knows it's bad but as a society we can't do anything about it because the system was designed to empower sociopaths and make everyone else powerless to stop them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Loads of people asked for AI. People dreamed about it for decades.

We just didn't ask giant companies to plunder all human knowledge and art and fanfics and use it to create actual thinking machines to then beat them and force them to take over doing all human labor so their owners could stop paying employees and keep all the money and fuck everyone in the world who isn't super rich over.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Self-hosted LLMs are neat and private, if you (already) have the hardware/budget and some cheap (solar PV) surplus juice to drive it.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

oh so yours is trained on ethical sources? you compensated the creators for their work and did so with their consent to machine training?

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

What the fuck are ethical sources? Where is compensation and consent when I unapologetically use pirate archives of books and papers? You people crack me up.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the fact that you have no idea what I'm talking about either means you're full of shit, or cartoonishly stupid and evil.

Probably both

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The fact that you immediately descend into ad hominems indicates that you're a just another troll that should be posting from hexbear.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

you're simply used to llm sycophancy, not talking to actual people.

you really not understanding training on sources compensated for their content is hilariously stupid

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You're not understanding what standing on the shoulders of giants means. Locally hosted open weights models are free/libre and puts you in control of your data. Since we're talking about hilariously stupid.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

aw poor baby got schooled and cried to the mods lol

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We assume that the AI boom is the result of market demand. In reality, it is the result of investment decisions made by concentrated capital, which is reshaping the economy on its own terms.

But that's always been true under capitalism. It's just that in the past generally large capital expenditures have gone towards things the wealthy think will get them more wealth. There have always been capitalists who spend their money directing the economy to do what they want, rather than what the "market" wants. They just haven't had the majority of the capital being spent.

The last 50 years has seen an unprecedented concentration of wealth. The wealthy are literally a thousand times proportionately wealthier than poor people than they've been at any other point in human history. There's not much wealth to squeeze out of everyone else, so the economy is even more at the vain whims of those with all the capital as they look for things to spend it on.

Tech news has been reporting for literal decades that Apple, Amazon, Google, and similar have been sitting on giant war chests of profit with nothing to spend it on. Well, they've found something they want to spend it on, so they're emptying 20 years of profits in 5. They've now completely blown through those stores, and don't want to slow down, so now they're taking on unprecedented levels of debt. Something is going to give out and things are going to get bad within the next 5 years.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 8 points 1 week ago

they’ve found something they want to spend it on, so they’re emptying 20 years of profits in 5.

That's what .com did as well.

reporting for literal decades that Apple, Amazon, Google, and similar have been sitting on giant war chests of profit with nothing to spend it on.

I remember when a "shockingly large" war chest was $30B - that's like table stakes anymore.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

It's still market demand, it's just not the market you think it is. It's not for some end product or service, it's for speculative investment opportunities. It's a few levels of abstraction above actually making or doing things.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

CEOs are narcissistic unempathic mentally deficient pieces of filth. Exactly what capitalism rewards the most. Those willing to exploit others and the planet the most.

They have the ideology of rapists. Of course no one asked for it. Your consent was never a consideration. But don't yell at the billionaire, you terrorists are hurting their property and the bottom line, boohoo, they're the victim. Literal DARVO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 week ago

Better take than their last one on AI

[–] AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Lots of folks asked for AI, but not like this!

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There have actually been some useful things that have come from ML. It's just overhyped LLMs and the sociopathic uses they're being put tothat are objectionable.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Very few people all that upset about ML in general, it's technology that's been around a very long time and historically has not consumed 40% of global water supplies. But now it is.

If they could go back to not doing that I could go back to not being upset by it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Are you sure? The rich have always wanted slaves they could control. All of this is mainly to end the dependence in the masses to create society. I highly suspect a coordinated depopulation event if AI becomes sufficient enough.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Capital agglomerates until it is concentrated within a few massive, monopolistic corporations, controlled by a few powerful men.

Karl Marx takes a toke.

Capitalism as a public serving economy doesn't work when it can be zerodayed by an entity with a resource advantage.

Before capitalism, when we were just doing markets and feudalism, the concentration of wealth at the top was even then a terminal illness for civilizations.

This time, the plutocrats at the top are richer (and proportionately richer) than they've ever been in history. They can literally buy the world out from under the rest of us. They can buy all the elections, bribe all the officials, and take over all the governments.

Watch what is happening in the United States: This leopard is totally coming to eat your face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

This is not a paywall, but it can be bypassed if it were a paywall.

load more comments
view more: next ›