this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
438 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

12002 readers
729 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chickenf622@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of those rare times where more formal math notation is more understandable than plain English. Assuming that you're not in a field where you use formal math notation all the time.

[–] stevles@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

I guess it depends on your definition of plain English. I wouldn't consider the English in that to be plain, particularly as they had a typo that seemed Deliberate.

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 44 points 1 week ago (4 children)

While I absolutely love the math explanation, the 'plain English' one is not comprehensible because there's a mistake or a typo:

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to debut her first ten ~~top 10~~ Hot 100 hits in the top 10.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So her first 10 songs that got into the hot 100 were in place 1-10? I'm still confused.

She's had ten songs make it onto the Hot 100 list, and all ten of them were in the top ten. None debuted at #11 or below.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sven said, "Ted, send ten tents."

Ted said, "Sven, send ten cents."

When Sven sent Ted ten cents,

then Ted sent Sven ten tents.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Sounds like fraud

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Yes. Exactly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

To be honest, I didn’t understand either explanation until I saw yours.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

That's incorrect. The criteria is that the records were in the top 10 at some time and started in the top 10 right away. Rodrigo is the first to achieve both with her first ten records that were ever in the top 10. In theory, she might've had other songs that were in the top 100 but not top 10.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to debut her first ten ~~top 10 Hot 100~~ hits in the top 10.

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

As far as we know, going by Lynn's definition, she could have had some hits prior to the tenth top ten one that didn't made it to the top 100, and still be (10, 10)-Olivian.

[–] Kinggold@feddit.org 38 points 1 week ago

Relevant xkcd

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All Olivia's singles that made it into the Top 10 also debuted within the Top 10, a first for a female artist in the top Hot 100 chart.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Does the Hot 100 have any relevance here? If she's in the Top 10, that would already imply Hot 100?

[–] needanke@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I guess Hot 100 is the brand name of the charts here.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, I guess "Top 10" isn't a thing just the top of the Hot 100.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to debut her first ten top 10 Hot 100 hits in the top 10.

Ok. So if I'm reading this right, the word "debut" is the important word here.

"Hot 100" is the industry-standard chart of song popularity, published by Billboard. The "100" there is confusing the headline, so let's call that "THE LIST."

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to debut her first ten top 10 "THE LIST" hits in the top 10.

So it's impressive to get a song on THE LIST. Having it anywhere on the list is genuinely impressive. But it's more impressive to hit the Top Ten of THE LIST. We'll call those songs "SUPERHITS."

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to debut her first ten "SUPERHITS" on "THE LIST" as "SUPERHITS."

As impressive as having a song that becomes a SUPERHIT is, it's even more impressive for your song to start there, right as soon as it's come out, without needing to work its way up from the bottom. Let's call those "LIGHTNING BOLTS." Also, everything we're taking about is on THE LIST, we can collapse that repetitive term now.

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to have exclusively "LIGHTNING BOLTS" as her first ten "SUPERHITS."

So, no SUPERHITS that weren't LIGHTNING BOLTS. But a quick look at Wikipedia shows that she's had 13 singles (which...wow, I thought she'd been around longer than that), which means she's released three songs that were never SUPERHITS. Either they got on THE LIST but peaked at 11 or lower, or they never made THE LIST at all.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You make the world a better place. Thank you.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're very kind, thank you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Olivia Rodrigo Becomes the First Woman in History to Have Her First 10 Songs to Reach the Hot 100 Chart to Debut in the Top 10

How hard was that?

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The hardest obstacle wasn't logic, but the max. char limit /s

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

If I would've had more time I would written a shorter ~~letter~~ headline

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

10/10. Would Olivian again.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well I didn't vote for her

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't vote for Olivians!

[–] Klear@piefed.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, how do they become (10, 10)-Olivian?

[–] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did some watery tart throw a scimitar at her?

[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That’s no basis for a system of government!

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I voted for Kodos

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have two degrees and still need a chart to map out the translation. I guess it's my own fault for choosing degrees in charts and making those full room size conspiracy maps with the yarn that you see in movies.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Her first 10 top-10 songs debuted there. This is notable because many top-10 songs don't start there, they build up to that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How many of them were also

k-pop

...I'll see myself out.

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

None of this makes any sense to me

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

I'm an old guy. I have no idea who she is.

"I used to be with ‘it’, but then they changed what ‘it’ was. Now what I’m with isn’t ‘it’ anymore and what’s ‘it’ seems weird and scary to me."

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The person who wrote the translation has had to break down concepts for undergrads before.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I don't understand how this woman is popular. All she does in her music is whine and cry about greasy ex boyfriend with the Gen Z broccoli hair. And yet it's an extremely successful formula for her.

It's like, why you gotta have such low standards, girl? You're rich, famous, and pretty; you can do way better than him.

I find a lot of celebrities also have terrible qualities

So what you are saying is she needs to find an attractive guy with a great personality with low enough standards or poor enough self esteem to date her for very vapid qualities despite her personality (I’m guessing)

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good marketing, or is it actually good music?

[–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

I feel like it literally has to be all marketing. I mean good music would certainly have a role in keeping it in the top 10 or moving it to a higher place in the top 10 but for it to DEBUT there, before anyone has even heard it yet, must be marketing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] needanke@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That is the standard LaTex maths notation n I think.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›